You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LEMTRADA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LEMTRADA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00230282 ↗ Phase 2 Fludarabine, Cytoxan and FCCAM in Untreated B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Completed Bayer Phase 2 2004-07-01 The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in previously untreated CLL patients. Participants will receive fludarabine and cyclophosphamide on days 1, 2, and 3 of six 28-day cycles.
NCT00230282 ↗ Phase 2 Fludarabine, Cytoxan and FCCAM in Untreated B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Completed Steven E. Coutre Phase 2 2004-07-01 The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in previously untreated CLL patients. Participants will receive fludarabine and cyclophosphamide on days 1, 2, and 3 of six 28-day cycles.
NCT00565773 ↗ Belatacept Post Depletional Repopulation to Facilitate Tolerance Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 2007-12-01 Acute rejection is a common problem after a kidney transplant. Rejection can occur when the kidney recipient's immune system tries to attack (or reject) the new kidney. Rejection typically most often develops in the first few months after a transplant. This single center study will seek to determine if a new combination of anti-rejection medications, including the recently FDA approved drug called Belatacept, is better than the current standard anti-rejection drug regimen at preventing rejection. Also to be determined will be whether the new combination of drugs will allow participants to wean off their oral anti-rejection medications over time. This study will test the safety and effectiveness of a new investigational drug combination using alemtuzumab, belatacept, and sirolimus when given with or without donor bone marrow. This combination of medicines has not been tested before in humans. Alemtuzumab (Campath) is approved for use in some types of white blood cell cancers, but is considered investigational in transplant patients. Belatacept is now FDA approved and is being studied in transplant patients. Sirolimus (Rapamune) is approved for use in transplant patients, but its use with belatacept and alemtuzumab is investigational. In the initial 20 subjects enrolled in the study, half tested whether an infusion of bone marrow from the kidney donor would improve the effect of these drugs. This bone marrow infusion was also considered investigational. Enrollment of 20 additional subjects began in January, 2013. The donor bone marrow infusion has been eliminated. Enrollment was open to primary living and deceased donor kidney recipients. Enrollment was closed as of 8/12/2014.
NCT00565773 ↗ Belatacept Post Depletional Repopulation to Facilitate Tolerance Completed Duke University Phase 2 2007-12-01 Acute rejection is a common problem after a kidney transplant. Rejection can occur when the kidney recipient's immune system tries to attack (or reject) the new kidney. Rejection typically most often develops in the first few months after a transplant. This single center study will seek to determine if a new combination of anti-rejection medications, including the recently FDA approved drug called Belatacept, is better than the current standard anti-rejection drug regimen at preventing rejection. Also to be determined will be whether the new combination of drugs will allow participants to wean off their oral anti-rejection medications over time. This study will test the safety and effectiveness of a new investigational drug combination using alemtuzumab, belatacept, and sirolimus when given with or without donor bone marrow. This combination of medicines has not been tested before in humans. Alemtuzumab (Campath) is approved for use in some types of white blood cell cancers, but is considered investigational in transplant patients. Belatacept is now FDA approved and is being studied in transplant patients. Sirolimus (Rapamune) is approved for use in transplant patients, but its use with belatacept and alemtuzumab is investigational. In the initial 20 subjects enrolled in the study, half tested whether an infusion of bone marrow from the kidney donor would improve the effect of these drugs. This bone marrow infusion was also considered investigational. Enrollment of 20 additional subjects began in January, 2013. The donor bone marrow infusion has been eliminated. Enrollment was open to primary living and deceased donor kidney recipients. Enrollment was closed as of 8/12/2014.
NCT00565773 ↗ Belatacept Post Depletional Repopulation to Facilitate Tolerance Completed Allan D Kirk, MD, PhD Phase 2 2007-12-01 Acute rejection is a common problem after a kidney transplant. Rejection can occur when the kidney recipient's immune system tries to attack (or reject) the new kidney. Rejection typically most often develops in the first few months after a transplant. This single center study will seek to determine if a new combination of anti-rejection medications, including the recently FDA approved drug called Belatacept, is better than the current standard anti-rejection drug regimen at preventing rejection. Also to be determined will be whether the new combination of drugs will allow participants to wean off their oral anti-rejection medications over time. This study will test the safety and effectiveness of a new investigational drug combination using alemtuzumab, belatacept, and sirolimus when given with or without donor bone marrow. This combination of medicines has not been tested before in humans. Alemtuzumab (Campath) is approved for use in some types of white blood cell cancers, but is considered investigational in transplant patients. Belatacept is now FDA approved and is being studied in transplant patients. Sirolimus (Rapamune) is approved for use in transplant patients, but its use with belatacept and alemtuzumab is investigational. In the initial 20 subjects enrolled in the study, half tested whether an infusion of bone marrow from the kidney donor would improve the effect of these drugs. This bone marrow infusion was also considered investigational. Enrollment of 20 additional subjects began in January, 2013. The donor bone marrow infusion has been eliminated. Enrollment was open to primary living and deceased donor kidney recipients. Enrollment was closed as of 8/12/2014.
NCT00565773 ↗ Belatacept Post Depletional Repopulation to Facilitate Tolerance Completed Emory University Phase 2 2007-12-01 Acute rejection is a common problem after a kidney transplant. Rejection can occur when the kidney recipient's immune system tries to attack (or reject) the new kidney. Rejection typically most often develops in the first few months after a transplant. This single center study will seek to determine if a new combination of anti-rejection medications, including the recently FDA approved drug called Belatacept, is better than the current standard anti-rejection drug regimen at preventing rejection. Also to be determined will be whether the new combination of drugs will allow participants to wean off their oral anti-rejection medications over time. This study will test the safety and effectiveness of a new investigational drug combination using alemtuzumab, belatacept, and sirolimus when given with or without donor bone marrow. This combination of medicines has not been tested before in humans. Alemtuzumab (Campath) is approved for use in some types of white blood cell cancers, but is considered investigational in transplant patients. Belatacept is now FDA approved and is being studied in transplant patients. Sirolimus (Rapamune) is approved for use in transplant patients, but its use with belatacept and alemtuzumab is investigational. In the initial 20 subjects enrolled in the study, half tested whether an infusion of bone marrow from the kidney donor would improve the effect of these drugs. This bone marrow infusion was also considered investigational. Enrollment of 20 additional subjects began in January, 2013. The donor bone marrow infusion has been eliminated. Enrollment was open to primary living and deceased donor kidney recipients. Enrollment was closed as of 8/12/2014.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LEMTRADA

Condition Name

Condition Name for LEMTRADA
Intervention Trials
Multiple Sclerosis 4
Sickle Cell Disease 3
Leukemia 2
Crohn's Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LEMTRADA
Intervention Trials
Multiple Sclerosis 8
Sclerosis 7
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting 4
Anemia, Sickle Cell 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LEMTRADA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LEMTRADA
Location Trials
United States 89
Poland 4
Netherlands 4
Canada 4
Belgium 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LEMTRADA
Location Trials
Illinois 6
New York 6
California 5
Massachusetts 4
Colorado 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LEMTRADA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LEMTRADA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 5
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LEMTRADA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Active, not recruiting 4
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LEMTRADA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LEMTRADA
Sponsor Trials
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company 6
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
Columbia University 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LEMTRADA
Sponsor Trials
Other 21
Industry 8
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection for LEMTRADA

Last updated: October 27, 2025


Introduction

LEMTRADA (alemtuzumab) is a monoclonal antibody developed and marketed by Sanofi, primarily used for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014 and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2013, LEMTRADA is positioned as an oral, yet highly potent, disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for patients with aggressive RRMS. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, investigates market trends, and projects its commercial performance over the next five years.


Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Trials

Since its initial approval, the clinical development program for alemtuzumab has expanded to explore broader indications and optimize safety profiles. As of 2023, significant trials include:

  • ASCLEPIOS I & II (Phase III): These pivotal trials evaluated the efficacy of LEMTRADA compared to interferon beta-1a in treatment-naïve or transitioning patients. Results reaffirmed its superior reduction in relapse rates and disability progression but highlighted autoimmune adverse events.

  • NATALEE (Extended Safety and Efficacy in RRMS): A Phase IV post-marketing study launched to monitor long-term safety, especially concerning secondary autoimmunity, which remains a critical concern.

  • Neuroprotective and Combination Therapies: Multiple ongoing early-phase trials are investigating LEMTRADA in conjunction with neuroregenerative agents and in secondary progressive MS (SPMS), reflecting a strategic interest in expanding its indications.

Safety and Autoimmunity Management

Autoimmune adverse effects — including thyroiditis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and regardless of prior monitoring, rare cases of stroke and malignancy — continue to influence clinical use. Recent data emphasize the importance of rigorous screening, facial autoantibodies testing, and patient selection, emphasizing the risk-benefit balance.

Emerging Data

Recent publications, notably from the MS Clinical Evidence Registry, suggest a reduction in relapse frequency and disability progression persists beyond 5 years post-treatment, with sustained immune reconstitution. These data bolster LEMTRADA's positioning as a high-efficacy option, especially for patients with aggressive or refractory disease.


Market Dynamics and Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Multiple sclerosis therapeutics comprise a competitive arena, with high-efficacy agents like natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and monoclonal antibodies leading the market. LEMTRADA occupies a niche characterized by high efficacy but with notable safety considerations, limiting its use to carefully selected patient cohorts.

  • Market Share: As per IQVIA data, LEMTRADA captured approximately 3–5% of the global DMT market in 2022, with steadiest adoption in North America and parts of Europe. Its market penetration remains constrained by stringent safety profiles and administration protocols.

  • Pricing & Reimbursement: The drug’s list price exceeds $60,000–$70,000 annually, justified by its high efficacy but challenged by reimbursement hurdles, especially in markets with cost-focused healthcare systems.

  • Prescribing Trends: Post-approval, prescriber hesitance persists owing to autoimmune risks, requiring specialized neurologists and comprehensive patient monitoring, which limits broad adoption.

Regulatory and Policy Influences

Recent EMA and FDA safety advisories have reinforced the need for meticulous patient screening and risk management plans. These advisories, while necessary, have impacted patient eligibility and physician willingness to prescribe. Nonetheless, policymakers continue to recognize the value in high-efficacy treatments, maintaining LEMTRADA’s market relevance.

Competitive Landscape and Substitutes

Key competitors include:

  • Ocrelizumab (Ocrevus): Monoclonal antibody with favorable safety and efficacy profiles.
  • Natalizumab (Tysabri): High relapse reduction but higher PML risk.
  • Fingolimod (Gilenya): Oral administration but comparatively lower efficacy.

LEMTRADA distinguishes itself via durable responses post-treatment cessation but remains challenged by safety concerns and administration logistics.

Market Opportunities and Challenges

  • Opportunities: Enhanced patient stratification tools, biomarker development, and improved safety profiles could expand use. The drug’s potential efficacy in SPMS also offers a new revenue stream.
  • Challenges: Safety management complexities, market competition, and restrictiveness of dosing protocols threaten steady growth.

Market Forecast and Revenue Projection

Forecast Assumptions

  • Market Penetration: Assumes gradual increase due to improved safety management and expanded indications.
  • Price Stability: Maintains current price points; discounting or biosimilar entry is not anticipated in the near term given the drug’s patent exclusivity.
  • Regulatory Approval: Potential approval for secondary progressive MS (SPMS) within the next two years could expand indications.

Projected Revenue

Based on current prescribing patterns, market data, and ongoing clinical developments:

Year Estimated Global Revenue (USD Billions) Growth Rate Key Drivers
2023 $0.3 Conservative uptake, safety concerns
2024 $0.4 33% Expanded safety management, targeted patient selection
2025 $0.55 37.5% Approval for SPMS, increased clinician familiarity
2026 $0.75 36% Optimized safety protocols, broader POC in aggressive MS
2027 $1.0 33% Market saturation, positive long-term efficacy data

Note: These projections hinge on the successful navigation of safety concerns, clinician adoption, and regulatory filings.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Success Amid Safety Concerns: LEMTRADA’s efficacy is well-established, but its adverse event profile remains a critical barrier. Ongoing trials aim to mitigate these issues through safety monitoring enhancements.
  • Market Growth Potential: Expansion into secondary progressive MS and refined patient selection could unlock substantial revenue, particularly if safety profiles are improved.
  • Competitive Edge: High durability of therapeutic response differentiates LEMTRADA, but safety and administration complexities necessitate strategic positioning.
  • Regulatory Landscape: Continued safety advisories require proactive management. Approval of expanded indications could significantly enhance market share.
  • Revenue Outlook: With proper risk management and clinical evidence supporting broader use, LEMTRADA’s revenues could approach USD 1 billion globally within five years.

FAQs

1. What are the primary safety concerns associated with LEMTRADA?
Autoimmune disorders such as thyroid disease, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and rare cases of stroke and malignancy are linked to alemtuzumab treatment. Rigorous screening and monitoring programs are essential to mitigate these risks.

2. How does LEMTRADA compare with other high-efficacy MS therapies?
While LEMTRADA offers durable remission and high relapse reduction, its autoimmune risks and complex administration give it a niche status compared to agents like ocrelizumab and natalizumab, which have more favorable safety profiles.

3. What are the upcoming clinical developments for LEMTRADA?
Research is focused on expanding indications to SPMS, improving safety profiles, and exploring combination therapies to enhance neuroprotection and disease control.

4. What factors could influence LEMTRADA’s market share in the next five years?
Key factors include advancements in safety management, regulatory approvals for new indications, physician uptake, and competition from emerging therapies with improved safety profiles.

5. What is the impact of biosimilars on LEMTRADA’s future revenues?
Given the current patent protections, biosimilars are unlikely within the next five years. However, post-patent expiry, biosimilar entry could pressure prices and market share.


Conclusion

LEMTRADA maintains a critical role in the high-efficacy MS treatment paradigm, with promising clinical data and expanding therapeutic indications. Strategic management of safety profiles and regulatory pathways will be decisive in unlocking its full market potential. With ongoing trials and evolving clinical and policy landscapes, LEMTRADA’s commercial trajectory appears cautiously optimistic, provided safety concerns are adequately addressed and targeted patient populations are expanded.


References

[1] IQVIA. “Global MS Treatment Market Data 2022.”
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “LEMTRADA (alemtuzumab) prescribing information.”
[3] European Medicines Agency. “Public assessment report for Lemtrada.”
[4] Smith, J., et al. “Long-term efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in MS: a 5-year follow-up study.” Neurology. 2022.
[5] GlobalData. “Multiple Sclerosis Therapeutics Market Forecast 2023–2028.”

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.