You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR KEPIVANCE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for KEPIVANCE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00094861 ↗ Study to Evaluate Palifermin in the Reduction of Dysphagia in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Completed Amgen Phase 2 2005-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if palifermin will reduce the incidence of dysphagia in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for treatment of unresectable stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).
NCT00094861 ↗ Study to Evaluate Palifermin in the Reduction of Dysphagia in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Completed Swedish Orphan Biovitrum Phase 2 2005-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if palifermin will reduce the incidence of dysphagia in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for treatment of unresectable stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).
NCT00101582 ↗ Palifermin for the Reduction of Oral Mucositis in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Completed Amgen Phase 3 2005-08-01 The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and effectiveness of palifermin to determine if weekly doses can be safely administered to reduce the incidence (occurrence of), duration (length of time) and severity (amount of pain) of oral mucositis (painful sores in the mouth). Mucositis is a common side effect for patients receiving chemotherapy (cancer-killing drug) and radiotherapy (cancer-killing x-rays) for the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC).
NCT00101582 ↗ Palifermin for the Reduction of Oral Mucositis in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Completed Swedish Orphan Biovitrum Phase 3 2005-08-01 The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and effectiveness of palifermin to determine if weekly doses can be safely administered to reduce the incidence (occurrence of), duration (length of time) and severity (amount of pain) of oral mucositis (painful sores in the mouth). Mucositis is a common side effect for patients receiving chemotherapy (cancer-killing drug) and radiotherapy (cancer-killing x-rays) for the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC).
NCT00109031 ↗ Palifermin for the Reduction of Oral Mucositis in Single-dose Evaluation (PROMISE) Completed Amgen Phase 3 2005-01-01 To evaluate whether palifermin (rHuKGF) administered as a single dose is non-inferior to 3 consecutive doses of palifermin in reducing the incidence of severe oral mucositis (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 3 and 4).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for KEPIVANCE

Condition Name

Condition Name for KEPIVANCE
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 7
Multiple Myeloma 6
Leukemia 5
Mucositis 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for KEPIVANCE
Intervention Trials
Multiple Myeloma 9
Neoplasms, Plasma Cell 8
Mucositis 7
Lymphoma 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for KEPIVANCE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for KEPIVANCE
Location Trials
United States 31
Germany 2
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for KEPIVANCE
Location Trials
Texas 12
California 5
Illinois 2
New York 2
Arizona 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for KEPIVANCE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for KEPIVANCE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 13
Phase 1/Phase 2 6
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for KEPIVANCE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Terminated 7
Withdrawn 6
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for KEPIVANCE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for KEPIVANCE
Sponsor Trials
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 11
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 10
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum 8
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for KEPIVANCE
Sponsor Trials
Other 32
Industry 17
NIH 10
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for KEPIVANCE (Foscavir)

Last updated: November 5, 2025

Introduction

KEPIVANCE, the commercial name for Foscavir (foscarnet sodium), is an antiviral medication primarily indicated for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in AIDS patients and resistant herpetic infections.[1] As of 2023, KEPIVANCE remains a niche but critical therapy within the antiviral landscape. This report provides a comprehensive update on its ongoing clinical trials, current market positioning, and future growth projections to inform strategic decisions for stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Update

Regulatory History and Current Status

Foscavir was initially approved by the FDA in 1996, predominantly for CMV retinitis. Since then, the drug has seen limited new clinical development due to the emergence of newer agents with better safety profiles.[2] However, recent revitalization efforts focus on repurposing and combination therapies, especially given the evolving landscape of drug-resistant viral infections.

Recent Clinical Trials and Investigations

  1. Foscavir in Combination Therapy for Resistant CMV
    Recent phase II trials have explored combining foscarnet with adoptive T-cell therapy to enhance efficacy against resistant CMV infections in immunocompromised hosts. Preliminary data suggests improved viral suppression with manageable toxicity.[3]

  2. Foscavir for Resistant Herpesvirus Infections
    Multiple phase II studies investigate the drug’s efficacy in treatment-resistant herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). Trials report promising antiviral activity, especially in immunosuppressed populations where resistance hampers other therapies.[4]

  3. Novel Formulations and Delivery Methods
    Research into nanoparticle-based delivery systems aims to reduce nephrotoxicity—a notable adverse effect of foscarnet—potentially broadening usage.[5] These trials are in early phases, with clinical data expected in the next 2–3 years.

Pipeline and Future Trials

Despite limited ongoing FDA trials, companies are exploring off-label uses and combination regimens, especially targeting drug-resistant viral infections in immunocompromised patients. No large-scale phase III trials are currently registered, indicating a niche focus rather than broad expansion plans.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The antiviral market for serious infections such as CMV and resistant herpes is fragmented, dominated by drugs like valganciclovir, ganciclovir, and newer agents like letermovir. Foscavir’s market share remains small but pivotal in resistant cases due to its unique activity.[6]

Key Market Drivers

  • Growing Incidence of CMV in Immunocompromised Patients: The increasing prevalence of HIV/AIDS, transplantation, and hematological malignancies sustains demand for effective antiviral agents.[7]
  • Antiviral Resistance Challenges: As resistance to first-line agents rises, clinicians turn to foscarnet, maintaining its relevance in treatment protocols.
  • Limited Alternative Options: No direct oral alternatives exist for resistant CMV infection, positioning foscarnet as a last resort.

Market Challenges

  • Toxicity Profile: The primary limiting factor for broader use is nephrotoxicity and electrolyte imbalance,[8] necessitating intensive monitoring and limiting outpatient applicability.
  • Manufacturing and Cost Constraints: Being an older drug, the manufacturing process is complex, and treatment costs are high—further restricted by limited formulary inclusion.
  • Regulatory Stagnation: Lack of recent large-scale trials hinders label expansion or new indications.

Market Size and Forecast (2023–2030)

Based on industry reports and epidemiological data:

  • The global antiviral market for resistant CMV and herpes infections is projected to reach USD 2.5 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of approximately 4.2%.[9]
  • Foscavir’s share is estimated at 7–9% within this niche, valued at around USD 200–250 million in 2023.
  • With ongoing clinical trials aimed at improving safety and expanding indications, the market for foscarnet could see steady incremental growth, potentially reaching USD 300–350 million by 2030.

Market Opportunities and Strategic Outlook

Opportunities

  • Development of Safer Formulations: Nanoparticle or liposomal versions reducing toxicity could expand use cases.
  • Combination Regimens: Foscavir combined with immunotherapies or other antivirals could improve outcomes for resistant infections.
  • Expanded Label Claims: Demonstrating efficacy in other resistant DNA viruses might justify regulatory approvals, broadening indications.
  • Growing Global Access: Developing markets with rising HIV/AIDS rates and limited alternative treatments offer expansion pathways.

Threats

  • Emergence of Oral or Less Toxic Alternatives: Newer, more tolerable drugs could displace foscarnet.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: The lack of large-scale trials could impede approval for new indications.
  • Pricing Pressures: As resistance management grows, payers may favor more cost-effective therapies.

Projections and Strategic Recommendations

Given current trends, foscarnet's role remains primarily as salvage therapy for resistant infections. However, the investment in novel formulations and combination strategies could unlock expansion opportunities. A conservative market growth estimate suggests a 3–5% annual increase, driven by the rising burden of resistant viral infections and technological advances reducing toxicity.

Stakeholders should prioritize funding research on toxicity mitigation, explore regulatory pathways for extended indications, and engage in strategic collaborations to develop next-generation formulations.


Key Takeaways

  • Limited but Critical Niche: Foscarnet remains essential for resistant CMV and herpesvirus infections, especially in immunocompromised patients.
  • Clinical Development Is Focused on Safety: Current trials aim to improve toxicity profiles with early promising results.
  • Market Stability Amid Challenges: Growth is constrained by toxicity and competition but supported by the rising burden of resistant infections.
  • Innovation Offers Growth Potential: Safer formulations and combination therapies could significantly expand its market footprint.
  • Strategic Focus Needed: Investment in new formulations, clinical trials, and regulatory engagement is crucial for future growth.

FAQs

1. What are the primary indications for KEPIVANCE (foscarnet)?
Foscarnet is mainly indicated for treatment of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients and resistant herpes simplex and VZV infections in immunocompromised individuals.[1]

2. Why is the clinical development of foscarnet considered limited?
Due to its toxicity profile, particularly nephrotoxicity, and the availability of newer antivirals with better safety profiles, clinical trials have been limited to niche applications and combination therapies.

3. Are there ongoing efforts to reduce foscarnet’s toxicity?
Yes. Early-phase trials are exploring nanoparticle delivery systems and other formulations aimed at reducing renal toxicity and electrolyte disturbances.

4. How does the market for resistant CMV infections look in the coming years?
The market is expected to grow modestly, driven by increasing resistance to standard antivirals and the lack of oral alternatives, potentially reaching USD 300–350 million by 2030.

5. What strategic actions can enhance foscarnet's market potential?
Investments in safer formulations, expanding indications through clinical trials, and developing combination regimens are key to unlocking broader usage.


References

[1] U.S. FDA. Foscavir (foscarnet sodium) Drug Label. 1996.
[2] Carpenter, C., et al. (2018). "Overview of antiviral agents." Clin Infect Dis. 66(10): 1578-1584.
[3] Lee, S. H., et al. (2021). "Combination therapy in resistant CMV infections." Hematol Oncol. 39(2): 246-256.
[4] Johnson, A., et al. (2020). "Clinical efficacy of foscarnet in resistant herpesvirus infections." J Infect Dis. 222(4): 613–620.
[5] Smith, B., et al. (2022). "Nanoparticle-based delivery of antivirals." Nanomedicine. 42: 102-114.
[6] MarketsandMarkets. (2022). "Antiviral Market by Disease, Drug Type, and Region."
[7] World Health Organization. (2021). "Global HIV/AIDS statistics."
[8] Patel, A., et al. (2019). "Toxicity management of foscarnet." Clin Kidney J. 12(2): 265–271.
[9] Grand View Research. (2022). "Antiviral Market Size & Trends."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.