Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IDELVION


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for IDELVION

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04108260 ↗ The Effectiveness of Recombinant Coagulation Factor IX With Recombinant Albumin (rIX-FP) in Severe Hemophilia B Patients Recruiting National Taiwan University Hospital Phase 4 2020-04-21 The pivotal clinical data support prolonged dosing intervals of up to 14 days for routine prophylaxis in hemophilia B patients. The majority of adult and pediatric patients using Idelvion for routine prophylaxis had a median annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) of 0.00. The majority (99%) of bleeding episodes were managed successfully with one or two infusions, and 94% of bleeds were controlled with only one infusion regardless of the cause or location. The rationale for this study is to collect the effectiveness and safety data of severe hemophilia B patients treated with Idelvion following institutional standard of care. It is the aim of this study to extend the results of the clinical trial program to a broader hemophilia B population, and to compare with current alternative factor IX treatments in Taiwan.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IDELVION

Condition Name

Condition Name for IDELVION
Intervention Trials
Hemophilia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IDELVION
Intervention Trials
Hemophilia A 1
Hemophilia B 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IDELVION

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IDELVION
Location Trials
Taiwan 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IDELVION

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IDELVION
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IDELVION
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IDELVION

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IDELVION
Sponsor Trials
National Taiwan University Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IDELVION
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

IDELVION Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: May 7, 2026

IDELVION (albutrepenonacog alfa/eftrenonacog alfa class): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

What is IDELVION’s development status in clinical trials?

IDELVION is a long-acting recombinant coagulation factor IX product (extended half-life FIX for hemophilia B). Public clinical activity for IDELVION is concentrated in previously established programs and extensions rather than new Phase 3 pivots in 2023-2025. The current “trial” footprint is primarily ongoing follow-on studies, PK/PD confirmations, real-world capture, and durability monitoring consistent with post-authorization life-cycle management for hemophilia biologics.

Key observable pattern

  • The product’s late-stage registration-era evidence (efficacy and bleed prevention) is already established.
  • Ongoing clinical activity is concentrated in durability and longer-term exposure monitoring.

Evidence base (public listings)

  • IDELVION trial records and follow-up studies are maintained in clinical trial registries and sponsor-posted updates. (ClinicalTrials.gov listings.) [1]

What are the main clinical endpoints that still matter post-approval?

For extended half-life FIX, the endpoints that typically drive ongoing clinical value are:

  • Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated and total bleeds
  • Factor IX trough activity and pharmacokinetic durability
  • Inhibitor development (incidence and impact)
  • Safety signals (TEAE profile, immunogenicity, renal/hepatic tolerability)
  • Treatment burden proxies (dose interval maintenance, prophylaxis adherence feasibility)

Registry listings for IDELVION track these themes through follow-up and extension cohorts. [1]


How is IDELVION positioned in the hemophilia B market?

What is the competitive landscape?

Hemophilia B prophylaxis market share is shaped by extended half-life (EHL) FIX products, with a parallel category of gene therapy for eligible patients and a growing set of non-replacement approaches. IDELVION competes mainly against EHL FIX and, for a subset of patients, against gene therapy.

Competitive set (therapeutic category)

  • EHL FIX prophylaxis (IDELVION and peers in hemophilia B)
  • Gene therapy for eligible hemophilia B patients (route to long durability of endogenous FIX expression)
  • Bypassing agents and other products for inhibitor populations (where FIX products are not the prophylaxis backbone)

The market for IDELVION is therefore dynamic: growth is driven by uptake and adherence in EHL FIX, tempered by gene therapy conversion rates.

What are the pricing and reimbursement mechanics that drive uptake?

In hemophilia B, market adoption is strongly influenced by:

  • payer eligibility criteria (medical necessity and diagnosis confirmation)
  • prophylaxis vs on-demand reimbursement
  • authorization pathways for EHL dosing intervals
  • center of excellence and infusion clinic contracting

EHL FIX adoption tends to increase when dosing interval and demonstrated bleeding control reduce total infusion burden and align with local reimbursement frameworks.


Market Size, Demand Drivers, and Segment Outlook

What drives demand for IDELVION?

Demand for IDELVION is primarily driven by:

  • Prevalence of hemophilia B and diagnosis rates
  • Prophylaxis adoption versus episodic treatment
  • Persistence and adherence to EHL prophylaxis regimens
  • Switching behavior among EHL FIX brands based on payer policy, clinical preference, and demonstrated trough control

What limits growth?

Key headwinds in hemophilia B include:

  • Gene therapy substitution (patient-level conversion)
  • Switching friction (payer contracts, infusion center formularies)
  • Inhibitor incidence and differential performance in inhibitor vs non-inhibitor populations
  • Treatment interruptions due to coverage gaps or care setting transitions

Projections: IDELVION volume, revenue, and share trajectory

How should IDELVION’s near-term trajectory be modeled?

A practical projection model for IDELVION in hemophilia B should use a 3-layer structure:

  1. Patient population layer: eligible hemophilia B patients on prophylaxis (non-gene therapy)
  2. Penetration layer: share among EHL FIX options within eligible patients
  3. Treatment continuity layer: persistence trends and switching/attrition to gene therapy

Expected qualitative trajectory

  • Baseline stability in established geographies where EHL FIX remains the standard of care for most patients not converting to gene therapy.
  • Share pressure where peer EHL FIX products secure formulary positioning or where gene therapy uptake increases.

What is the most likely outlook by horizon?

Because IDELVION’s clinical program is not centered on new pivotal filings in the latest period and because hemophilia B demand is influenced by gene therapy competition, the most likely pattern is:

  • 2026-2027: steady demand from ongoing prophylaxis cohorts, with moderate share volatility driven by contracting and patient switching.
  • 2028-2030: gradual erosion of treatable prophylaxis population in regions with higher gene therapy uptake, partly offset by diagnostic growth and continued prophylaxis adoption among newly diagnosed patients.

This outlook aligns with how hemophilia replacement product portfolios typically evolve once gene therapy uptake accelerates. (Clinical trial activity for IDELVION continues via follow-on monitoring rather than new Phase 3 expansion.) [1]


Commercial Risks and Opportunities

Where is IDELVION most exposed?

  • Gene therapy uptake in hemophilia B can reduce eligible prophylaxis populations.
  • Formulary and contracting can shift patients among EHL FIX options.
  • Safety and immunogenicity outcomes in real-world and long-term cohorts can influence payer comfort.

Where is IDELVION most resilient?

  • Prophylaxis durability in extension cohorts supports continued payer and clinician confidence.
  • EHL convenience supports adherence, which can preserve persistence against episodic treatment pathways.
  • Broad use in routine care for patients who do not pursue gene therapy.

Clinical Trial Update (Registry-based)

Which trial records remain active for IDELVION?

IDELVION trial entries and follow-on studies are maintained in ClinicalTrials.gov and are the primary public window into ongoing clinical activity for this product. Trial records persist for:

  • long-term follow-up,
  • continuation after core studies,
  • PK/PD or safety monitoring cohorts,
  • and specific subpopulations defined by treatment history. [1]

Primary source: ClinicalTrials.gov listing and record history for IDELVION. [1]


Key Takeaways

  1. Clinical activity is life-cycle follow-on oriented, with long-term monitoring and durability consistent with an already-established hemophilia B prophylaxis product rather than new late-stage pivots. [1]
  2. Market growth is driven by prophylaxis adoption and persistence, but gene therapy is the main structural headwind in hemophilia B.
  3. Near-term outlook is stability with contracting-driven share movement; medium-term projections should incorporate gradual prophylaxis cohort conversion risk where gene therapy uptake accelerates.
  4. Model IDELVION’s revenue trajectory using patient eligible pools, EHL FIX share, and persistence, with gene therapy conversion as the key subtraction term.

FAQs

1. Is IDELVION currently in active Phase 3 development?
Publicly listed IDELVION trial activity in the latest registry window is dominated by follow-on and monitoring records rather than new Phase 3 registration programs. [1]

2. What endpoints matter most for ongoing IDELVION studies?
For extended half-life FIX, ongoing programs focus on ABR, trough activity/PK durability, inhibitor incidence, and long-term safety. (These are the recurring endpoints tracked across hemophilia B trial follow-up listings.) [1]

3. How does gene therapy affect IDELVION’s market projection?
Gene therapy can reduce the number of patients remaining on lifelong prophylaxis with EHL FIX, so projections should include a conversion subtraction rate from eligible prophylaxis pools.

4. What commercial factor most affects IDELVION adoption?
Reimbursement and formulary contracting for EHL FIX prophylaxis (coverage criteria and dosing interval alignment) is a primary determinant of uptake and persistence.

5. What is the most important variable to forecast IDELVION sales?
Patient persistence on prophylaxis and switching among EHL FIX brands, adjusted for gene therapy conversion in hemophilia B.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search results and record listings for IDELVION (albutrepenonacog alfa/eftrenonacog-alfa class product listings depending on record naming). U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.