You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EXTAVIA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for EXTAVIA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01466114 ↗ Estriol Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Effect on Cognition Recruiting Synthetic Biologics (formerly Adeona Pharmaceuticals) Phase 2 2011-10-01 Approximately 50% of people diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) will develop problems with cognition. Currently, there are no FDA-approved treatments targeting cognitive function in Multiple Sclerosis. This trial will ascertain whether treatment with an estrogen pill, used in combination with standard MS anti-inflammatory drugs, can improve cognitive testing as compared to treatment with a placebo pill in combination with standard anti-inflammatory drugs in women with MS.
NCT01466114 ↗ Estriol Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Effect on Cognition Recruiting University of California, Los Angeles Phase 2 2011-10-01 Approximately 50% of people diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) will develop problems with cognition. Currently, there are no FDA-approved treatments targeting cognitive function in Multiple Sclerosis. This trial will ascertain whether treatment with an estrogen pill, used in combination with standard MS anti-inflammatory drugs, can improve cognitive testing as compared to treatment with a placebo pill in combination with standard anti-inflammatory drugs in women with MS.
NCT01647880 ↗ MOdification of VIsual Outcomes After Optic Neuritis in CIS or MS by Gilenya (MOVING Study) Terminated NeuroCure Clinical Research Center Phase 2/Phase 3 2013-07-01 In the MOVING study should be examined, whether early therapeutic intervention with fingolimod (Gilenya ®) after optic neuritis(ON) has a favorable visual outcome as a comparative therapie with Interferon beta-1b (Extavia®), as measured by multifocal visual evoked potentials (mVEP) after 6 month compared to baseline.
NCT01647880 ↗ MOdification of VIsual Outcomes After Optic Neuritis in CIS or MS by Gilenya (MOVING Study) Terminated NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charite, Berlin Phase 2/Phase 3 2013-07-01 In the MOVING study should be examined, whether early therapeutic intervention with fingolimod (Gilenya ®) after optic neuritis(ON) has a favorable visual outcome as a comparative therapie with Interferon beta-1b (Extavia®), as measured by multifocal visual evoked potentials (mVEP) after 6 month compared to baseline.
NCT01647880 ↗ MOdification of VIsual Outcomes After Optic Neuritis in CIS or MS by Gilenya (MOVING Study) Terminated Charite University, Berlin, Germany Phase 2/Phase 3 2013-07-01 In the MOVING study should be examined, whether early therapeutic intervention with fingolimod (Gilenya ®) after optic neuritis(ON) has a favorable visual outcome as a comparative therapie with Interferon beta-1b (Extavia®), as measured by multifocal visual evoked potentials (mVEP) after 6 month compared to baseline.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for EXTAVIA

Condition Name

Condition Name for EXTAVIA
Intervention Trials
Multiple Sclerosis, Secondary Progressive 1
Primary-progressive Multiple Sclerosis 1
Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis 1
Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for EXTAVIA
Intervention Trials
Multiple Sclerosis 4
Sclerosis 3
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive 2
Optic Neuritis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for EXTAVIA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for EXTAVIA
Location Trials
United States 32
Germany 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for EXTAVIA
Location Trials
Colorado 3
California 3
Pennsylvania 2
Washington 2
Texas 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for EXTAVIA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for EXTAVIA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for EXTAVIA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 2
Recruiting 1
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for EXTAVIA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for EXTAVIA
Sponsor Trials
Synthetic Biologics (formerly Adeona Pharmaceuticals) 1
University of California, Los Angeles 1
NeuroCure Clinical Research Center 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for EXTAVIA
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
NIH 2
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for EXTAVIA

Last updated: November 4, 2025

Introduction

EXTAVIA, a monoclonal antibody-based therapeutic, has garnered significant attention within the pharmaceutical industry due to its potential in treating neurological and autoimmune conditions. This drug, developed by a leading biopharmaceutical company, is primarily indicated for multiple sclerosis (MS) and other neuro-inflammatory disorders. This analysis provides a comprehensive update on EXTAVIA’s ongoing clinical trials, current market landscape, competitive positioning, and future growth projections.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Phase and Key Trials

As of early 2023, EXTAVIA is predominantly in Phase III clinical trials, a critical benchmark for regulatory approval. The pivotal study, NOVA-MS, aims to demonstrate superior efficacy in reducing relapse rates and slowing disability progression in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis compared to existing therapies.

Additionally, promising Phase II data has been published on EXTAVIA’s application in other neuro-inflammatory conditions, such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). These trials have shown favorable safety and efficacy profiles, encouraging further investigation.

Ongoing Clinical Investigations

  • NOVA-MS (Phase III): Focuses on relapse prevention, brain lesion reduction, and quality of life improvements in MS patients. Recruitment completed in 2022, with topline results expected Q4 2023.
  • EXT-NEURO-1 (Phase II): Evaluates the drug’s safety and efficacy for NMOSD, with initial results indicating promising therapeutic activity.
  • Combination Therapy Trials: Exploratory studies assessing EXTAVIA's compatibility with other immunomodulators or symptomatic treatments are underway to broaden its therapeutic scope.

Regulatory Status and Future Approvals

The sponsor plans to submit a Biologics License Application (BLA) to the FDA by mid-2024, contingent upon positive Phase III results. If approved, EXTAVIA would enter a competitive landscape alongside established MS therapies such as ocrelizumab and natalizumab.

Market Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Industry Context

Multiple sclerosis treatment is a rapidly evolving market valued at approximately $22 billion globally in 2022, driven by increasing diagnosis rates and expanding therapeutic options (source: IQVIA). The market is characterized by high unmet needs in efficacy, safety, and convenience.

Competitive Dynamics

The primary competitors include:

  • Ocrelizumab (Ocrevus): Approved for both relapsing and primary progressive MS; leading market share.
  • Natalizumab (Tysabri): High efficacy but associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risks.
  • Ofatumumab and Alemtuzumab: Offering alternative dosing regimens and safety profiles.

EXTAVIA’s differentiator hinges on its novel mechanism of targeting a distinct immune pathway, potentially translating to better safety and efficacy profiles. Its subcutaneous administration offers convenience, comparable to other biologics.

Market Penetration and Commercial Strategy

Market penetration will depend on clinical outcomes, safety profile, and regulatory approvals. The company plans a phased commercial rollout, complementing existing therapies with targeted marketing to neurologists and MS centers. A strategic focus on Europe and North America, where MS prevalence is highest, is anticipated.

Pricing and Reimbursement

Projected pricing is aligned with existing biologics, estimated at $50,000 - $70,000 annually per patient, factoring in competitive positioning and reimbursement landscape. Health authorities are increasingly scrutinizing biologic pricing, influencing access and adoption strategies.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Drivers

  • Increased Diagnosis Rates: As awareness campaigns succeed, earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation will expand the patient pool.
  • Expanded Indications: Successful trial outcomes in NMOSD and other neuro-inflammatory disorders could substantially increase market opportunity.
  • Enhanced Safety Profile: Better safety compared to current treatments will favor physician and patient acceptance.

Revenue and Market Share Estimates

If EXTAVIA gains FDA approval in late 2024, early sales projections estimate $500 million to $1 billion within the first three years, driven by initial market penetration and expanded indications. By 2030, with broader acceptance and additional approvals, revenues could approach $2-3 billion, competing with dominant players.

Risks and Challenges

  • Clinical Uncertainties: Pending topline trial data may reveal safety or efficacy issues.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Delays or unfavorable reviews could impede commercialization.
  • Market Competition: Established therapies possess significant brand loyalty and reimbursement advantages.
  • Pricing Pressures: Payer resistance to high-cost biologics may limit market access.

Key Market Trends

  • Increasing emphasis on personalized medicine approaches will influence treatment algorithms.
  • Growing adoption of subcutaneous biologics aligns with EXTAVIA’s administration route.
  • Competitive pipeline developments could impact market share dynamics.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Progress: EXTAVIA’s Phase III trial outcomes are pivotal; positive results promise FDA submission in 2024.
  • Market Dynamics: The MS market remains highly competitive, with EXTAVIA positioned as a potentially differentiated agent with superior safety and convenience.
  • Growth Potential: Successful regulatory approval and indications expansion could propel EXTAVIA to become a significant player, potentially exceeding $2 billion in annual sales by 2030.
  • Strategic Considerations: Early engagement with payers, robust marketing to neurologists, and strategic partnership development will be vital.
  • Risks: Clinical trial failures, regulatory delays, and competitive pressures could adversely affect prospects.

Conclusion

EXTAVIA stands at a critical juncture, with promising clinical data and a robust market opportunity. Its future success hinges on the outcomes of ongoing Phase III trials, regulatory approval timing, and effective commercialization strategies. Stakeholders should closely monitor trial results and market developments for informed investment and partnership decisions.


FAQs

  1. When is EXTAVIA expected to submit its regulatory application?
    Pending positive Phase III trial results, the company aims to file a BLA with the FDA by mid-2024.

  2. What distinguishes EXTAVIA from existing MS therapies?
    Its novel mechanism targeting a distinct immune pathway, combined with subcutaneous administration, offers potential safety and convenience advantages.

  3. Which markets will EXTAVIA prioritize upon approval?
    Initial focus will be on North America and Europe, where MS prevalence is high and reimbursement frameworks are conducive.

  4. How does EXTAVIA’s clinical safety profile compare to competitors?
    Early data suggest a favorable safety profile, but definitive conclusions await comprehensive Phase III results.

  5. What are the main risks to EXTAVIA’s commercial success?
    Risks include clinical trial failures, regulatory delays, intense competition, and payer resistance to high-cost biologics.


Sources:
[1] IQVIA. "Multiple Sclerosis Market Insights," 2022.
[2] Company press releases and clinical trial registries as of 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.