Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ENGERIX-B


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ENGERIX-B

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00120796 ↗ Lamivudine and Therapeutic Vaccine Evaluation in Senegalese Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection (ANRS 12100 HEPADAK-2) Terminated GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2005-08-01 Chronic hepatitis B infection is a major public health issue in Senegal. The study will compare the efficacy of the treatment strategy combining Lamivudine and therapeutic vaccine (12 intra-muscular injections over a 6-month period) to a treatment with Lamivudine alone on the control of viral replication in patients with a replicative hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and an increase in hepatic enzymes.
NCT00120796 ↗ Lamivudine and Therapeutic Vaccine Evaluation in Senegalese Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection (ANRS 12100 HEPADAK-2) Terminated French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis Phase 3 2005-08-01 Chronic hepatitis B infection is a major public health issue in Senegal. The study will compare the efficacy of the treatment strategy combining Lamivudine and therapeutic vaccine (12 intra-muscular injections over a 6-month period) to a treatment with Lamivudine alone on the control of viral replication in patients with a replicative hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and an increase in hepatic enzymes.
NCT00133445 ↗ Pentavalent DTaP-Hep B-IPV Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 2005-12-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of administering a combination vaccine (DTaP-HepB-IPV; Pediarix™) to infants at birth, 2 and 6 months compared to the administration of a HepB vaccine at birth and the same combination vaccine at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Additionally, researchers will assess the body's antibody response (proteins produced by the body's immune system that help fight infections) following each vaccine dose. The study will enroll 5 healthy newborns, ages 0-5 days. Participants will be involved in study related procedures for up to 288 days, including blood sample collection and 5 study visits.
NCT00158756 ↗ Immune Response Post Pry Vaccination of 2 Formulations of DTPw-HBV Vaccine Given With Rotavirus Vaccine to Infants Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2005-09-12 To compare the two formulations of GSK Biologicals' DTPw-HBV vaccine to concomitant administration of CSL's DTPw vaccine and GSK Biologicals' HBV with respect to the antibody response to the diphtheria antigen after a three-dose primary vaccination course.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ENGERIX-B

Condition Name

Condition Name for ENGERIX-B
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis B 4
HIV 1
Infectious Diseases 1
Pertussis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ENGERIX-B
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis B 5
Hepatitis 3
Hepatitis A 3
Hepatitis, Chronic 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ENGERIX-B

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ENGERIX-B
Location Trials
Senegal 1
United Kingdom 1
Russian Federation 1
United States 1
Taiwan 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ENGERIX-B
Location Trials
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ENGERIX-B

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ENGERIX-B
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ENGERIX-B
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Terminated 1
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ENGERIX-B

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ENGERIX-B
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 2
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis 1
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ENGERIX-B
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
Industry 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Engerix-B clinical trials update, market analysis, and projection (hepatitis B vaccine)

Engerix-B (hepatitis B vaccine [recombinant], adjuvant-free) remains an established global prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV). Public clinical development activity is limited because the product is already marketed; market dynamics are driven by national immunization program (EPI) procurement, pricing pressure from multi-source vaccines, cold-chain execution, and antigen/technology shifts (for example, recombinant yeast-derived HBV vaccines). The near-term competitive outlook depends more on tender cycles and supply constraints than on new pivotal trials.


What is Engerix-B and what clinical evidence supports it?

Engerix-B is a recombinant HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) vaccine produced in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). It is used for active immunization against hepatitis B in infants, children, and adults, and in at-risk populations (including healthcare workers and hemodialysis patients) under local schedules.

What pivotal clinical trials established efficacy and safety?

Engerix-B’s clinical package is built on multi-year controlled studies across age groups, using seroprotection endpoints such as:

  • Anti-HBs antibody titers (commonly ≥10 mIU/mL)
  • Seroconversion rates after full vaccination
  • Reactogenicity and adverse-event profiles

Because Engerix-B is an established, post-approval product, the most recent “clinical trials” updates that affect market perception typically come from:

  • Immunogenicity studies in specific populations (for example, immunocompromised cohorts)
  • Schedule comparisons (catch-up strategies, accelerated regimens)
  • Bridging studies for manufacturing changes

What are the practical clinical outcomes that drive uptake?

For procurement decisions, EPIs and large payers typically focus on:

  • Immunogenicity durability in the target age band
  • Responder rates in adults and non-naïve cohorts
  • Interchangeability and compatibility with national schedules
  • Safety in infants and across contraindication-sensitive groups

What is the latest clinical trials update for Engerix-B (new studies vs. post-authorization data)?

A current “clinical trials update” for Engerix-B in the public domain is usually incremental rather than a new pivotal registration program. Market-facing updates typically fall into these buckets:

1) Immunogenicity in special populations

  • Adults with higher baseline risk and different immune status
  • Chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis schedules
  • Individuals with incomplete prior HBV vaccination

2) Schedule and administration studies

  • Standard infant series versus catch-up regimens
  • Co-administration studies with other infant vaccines within EPIs (where approved by local labeling)

3) Manufacturing or presentation changes

  • Antigen or process scale changes
  • Packaging, dose presentation, and batch-release policy studies that do not usually alter efficacy claims

Commercial implication: these studies typically support label maintenance and interchangeability arguments, which affect tender inclusion rather than triggering new demand waves.


What patents protect Engerix-B and how strong is the patent estate?

Engerix-B is a mature biologic with an IP posture dominated by:

  • Historical composition and manufacturing/process claims
  • Later-life formulation or method improvements
  • Secondary claims around production controls

In practice, the HBV vaccine market has moved to multi-source supply. For an established brand, the enforceable exclusivity is usually long expired, leaving regulatory and manufacturing barriers as the main non-IP constraints.

Net effect: competition is constrained less by patent blockers and more by:

  • Regulatory approvals and lot release capacity
  • Supply reliability for tender delivery windows
  • Price and delivery terms

When does Engerix-B lose exclusivity and what does that mean for competition?

For a widely marketed HBV recombinant vaccine, exclusivity has largely passed in most major jurisdictions. The practical driver is not a single “expiration date,” but the broader expiration of early-originator protection combined with the ability of competitors to meet:

  • Local strain and antigen specifications (where applicable)
  • GMP release standards
  • Cold-chain requirements

Competition implication: generics in the traditional small-molecule sense do not map cleanly to vaccines, but multi-source recombinant HBV vaccines compete directly on price and procurement fit.


What is the Orange Book status of Engerix-B?

Engerix-B is a biologic and is not evaluated via the US Orange Book listing framework used for small-molecule drugs. In the US, biologics licensure is tracked in the BLA ecosystem, with patent information (where submitted) appearing in the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) patent listing framework rather than Orange Book exclusivity for most vaccine products.


What FDA regulatory pathway and lot-release constraints affect Engerix-B availability?

Engerix-B is licensed as a biologic. Key regulatory factors that affect market continuity include:

  • BLA maintenance and periodic facility/CMC updates
  • Lot release testing and standardized control of potency and purity
  • Stability and transport validation for cold-chain integrity

Commercial implication: even when competitive approvals exist, supply interruptions can shift allocations to brand or best-performing suppliers during tender windows.


Who are the key competitors to Engerix-B in global hepatitis B vaccination?

Engerix-B competes against other recombinant HBV vaccines, including:

  • Euvax B (various regional manufacturers)
  • Shanvac B / similar recombinant HBV vaccines (depending on geography)
  • Heberbiovac HB (noting regional reach)
  • Other multi-source HBV recombinant vaccines supplied into EPIs

How does Engerix-B compare with competing hepatitis B vaccines?

Procurement comparisons generally track:

  • Price per dose and total program cost (including administration logistics)
  • Immunogenicity benchmarks and responder profiles
  • Presentation (single-dose vs multi-dose), shelf life, and packaging compatibility
  • Distribution reliability and volume commitments

What market size and demand drivers matter for Engerix-B?

HBV vaccine demand is driven by:

  • Universal vaccination programs (infant and adolescent schedules, with newborn birth-dose strategies)
  • Catch-up campaigns
  • Risk-based vaccination (healthcare workers, dialysis, household contacts of HBV cases)
  • Program renewals and tender cycles
  • Government and donor procurement budgets

Key procurement dynamics

  • Tender awards often prioritize lowest landed cost within quality and performance specifications.
  • Batch availability and confirmed delivery dates reduce program risk.
  • Suppliers with strong cold-chain execution gain repeat awards even if price is not the absolute lowest.

How does global immunization policy influence Engerix-B sales projections?

Sales projections for HBV vaccines follow policy and coverage:

  1. Coverage maintenance
    Stable EPI coverage sustains baseline demand.

  2. Birth-dose strategy and maternal HBV screening
    Programs that emphasize timely birth-dose vaccination lift early-life demand volume.

  3. Adult risk-based uptake
    Healthcare worker vaccination and high-risk cohort vaccination can expand incremental demand, especially where screening and occupational protocols exist.

  4. Tender-driven substitution
    Multi-source competition can shift market share without changing overall category growth.


What is the likely revenue outlook for Engerix-B over the next 3 to 5 years?

A defensible projection for Engerix-B requires category-level volume forecasts and supplier market share, but the key directional drivers are clear:

  • Category growth is typically modest in mature markets, more dependent on catch-up campaigns and population coverage targets.
  • Share is highly sensitive to tender price and supply reliability.
  • Brand value is concentrated in established purchasing relationships and program continuity.

Directional projection: Engerix-B is expected to remain a material contributor to HBV vaccine procurement, but growth is likely constrained by multi-source competition and periodic tender substitution.


What risks could reduce Engerix-B demand?

Primary downside risks:

  • Aggressive tender price undercutting by competing recombinant HBV vaccines
  • Supply allocation disruptions (manufacturing scale, release delays)
  • Policy shifts toward different vaccine presentations or schedule strategies
  • Budget tightening in lower-income settings where donors reprioritize procurement

What opportunities could support Engerix-B share gains?

Upside drivers:

  • Delivery reliability during tender windows
  • Strong immunogenicity outcomes and label fit in difficult-to-vaccinate populations
  • Program restarts and catch-up campaigns that require dependable supply
  • Co-administration acceptance where allowed by local guidance

Clinical trial endpoints, labeling, and immunogenicity: what do payers and clinicians optimize?

For HBV vaccines like Engerix-B, the commercial and clinical “scorecard” typically weights:

  • Seroprotection rates after completing primary series
  • Antibody persistence considerations in schedule planning
  • Safety and reactogenicity in infants and adults
  • Performance in immunocompromised settings

Key Takeaways

  • Engerix-B is an established recombinant HBV vaccine; “clinical trial updates” in the public domain are generally incremental (immunogenicity, schedule, bridging, and CMC-related studies).
  • Market performance is driven primarily by national EPI procurement, tender cycles, and supply reliability rather than new pivotal evidence.
  • IP-driven exclusivity is largely not the primary determinant of competition; multi-source recombinant HBV vaccines compete directly on price and procurement fit.
  • Revenue outlook is likely steady-to-modest in mature markets, with share volatility driven by tender substitution.

FAQs

1) Is Engerix-B considered a generic hepatitis B vaccine?
Engerix-B is a branded recombinant HBV vaccine. Competition comes from multi-source recombinant HBV vaccines; substitution is governed by procurement tender rules and regulatory approvals in each country.

2) Does Engerix-B require a cold chain and what does that mean for distribution?
Like most vaccines, it requires controlled storage and transport conditions. Tender awards frequently consider supplier cold-chain execution and delivery reliability.

3) What patient groups often use Engerix-B instead of other HBV vaccines?
Infants under national schedules, adults in risk-based vaccination programs, and patients requiring predictable immunogenicity in line with local labeling practices.

4) What types of new studies typically support HBV vaccine brands after approval?
Immunogenicity studies in special populations, schedule optimization/catch-up studies, and bridging studies related to manufacturing changes.

5) How do tender cycles affect Engerix-B market share?
Market share can shift quickly when procurement authorities re-bid. The winner is often the lowest landed cost supplier meeting quality and performance specifications, plus delivery certainty.


References

No sources were cited.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.