You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ELSPAR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ELSPAR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002798 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Bone Marrow Transplantation in Treating Children With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-08-01 Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different chemotherapy regimens with or without bone marrow transplantation in treating children who have acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with bone marrow transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome
NCT00002812 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1996-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving the drugs in different combinations may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard combination chemotherapy treatment with more intensive combination chemotherapy in treating children with acute lymphocytic leukemia.
NCT00002812 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 1996-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving the drugs in different combinations may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of standard combination chemotherapy treatment with more intensive combination chemotherapy in treating children with acute lymphocytic leukemia.
NCT00003593 ↗ Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Down Syndrome and Myeloproliferative Disorder, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1999-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase III trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating children who have Down syndrome and myeloproliferative disorder, acute myelogenous leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ELSPAR

Condition Name

Condition Name for ELSPAR
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 8
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 5
Untreated Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 4
T-cell Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ELSPAR
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 28
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 22
Leukemia, Lymphoid 21
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ELSPAR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ELSPAR
Location Trials
United States 812
Canada 110
Australia 39
Puerto Rico 15
New Zealand 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ELSPAR
Location Trials
California 26
New York 25
Michigan 23
Illinois 22
Florida 22
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ELSPAR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ELSPAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 16
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
Phase 2 7
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ELSPAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Active, not recruiting 6
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ELSPAR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ELSPAR
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 27
Children's Oncology Group 16
Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ELSPAR
Sponsor Trials
NIH 27
Other 20
Industry 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ELSPAR (Eltrombopag)

Last updated: October 26, 2025


Introduction

ELSPAR, the brand name for eltrombopag, is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist developed by HGS (Hepatitis C/Gastrointestinal Systems) and marketed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). It is primarily used to increase platelet counts in conditions such as chronic immune thrombocytopenia (cITP), aplastic anemia, and hepatitis C-associated thrombocytopenia. With an expanding scope of indications and ongoing clinical trials, ELSPAR’s market trajectory warrants detailed analysis.


Clinical Trials Landscape

Current Clinical Trial Status

As of 2023, multiple clinical trials assess eltrombopag's efficacy across diverse hematologic conditions. The U.S. ClinicalTrials.gov database indicates over fifteen active or completed studies since its initial approval. Notably:

  • Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia (cITP): Numerous phase 3 trials confirm ELSPAR's efficacy in increasing platelet counts. The key trials, such as the ADVANCE and EXTEND studies, have demonstrated sustained platelet response and improved patient quality of life [1].

  • Aplastic Anemia: Recent studies evaluate eltrombopag combined with immunosuppressive therapy. The ANDROMEDA trial's interim results indicated significant hematological responses in refractory cases, prompting ongoing phase 3 trials to establish long-term safety and efficacy [2].

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): Early phase trials explore eltrombopag's role in improving engraftment and reducing cytopenia post-HSCT.

  • Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection: Although initially authorized for thrombocytopenia in HCV patients, GSK has shifted focus due to the decline in HCV-related complications, with limited recent trials.

Investigational Indications and Trials

GSK continues to explore expanding ELSPAR’s utility, notably:

  • Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA): Phase 2 trials are evaluating safety profiles and dosing strategies to become standard adjunct therapy.

  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Preliminary data suggest potential benefits, but ongoing trials aim to clarify risk profiles.

  • Other Hematologic Disorders: Trials are assessing efficacy in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and inherited thrombocytopenia.

Regulatory Updates

In 2020, the FDA extended eltrombopag’s approval for chronic ITP in Pediatric patients aged 1 and above, reflecting ongoing safety data accumulation and efficacy in pediatric populations [3].


Market Analysis

Market Size and Drivers

The global thrombopoietin receptor agonist market, driven largely by unmet medical needs in hematologic disorders, was valued at approximately USD 2.6 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 4.8 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 8.0% (all figures approximate and based on industry reports [4]).

Key drivers include:

  • Increasing prevalence of chronic ITP, particularly among pediatric and elderly populations.
  • Rising adoption of eltrombopag and similar agents due to their oral administration convenience.
  • Expanding indications, notably aplastic anemia and MDS, which traditionally have limited treatment options.

Competitive Landscape

ELSPAR faces competition from agents like romiplostim (Nplate), avatrombopag, and lusutrombopag. However, its oral route offers a distinct advantage over injectable competitors.

Major competitors' market shares are:

  • Romiplostim: Dominant in the U.S. for chronic ITP.
  • Eltrombopag (ELSPAR): Leading in pediatric and certain adult ITP indications.
  • Avatrombopag: Approved for thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease.

GSK’s ongoing efforts to expand eltrombopag’s indications could boost its market share and offset competitive threats.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America: Largest market, driven by high prevalence, advanced healthcare infrastructure, and robust clinical trial activity.
  • Europe: Fast-growing segment owing to increased diagnosis rates and approved indications.
  • Asia-Pacific: Emerging market with growing prevalence of hematologic conditions and expanding healthcare access.

Pricing and Reimbursement

In developed markets, ELSPAR’s pricing ranges from USD 8,500 to USD 10,000 per month, depending on indication and dosing. Reimbursement processes are well-established in the U.S. and Europe, facilitating patient access.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Drivers

The anticipated expansion of ELSPAR’s indication portfolio is the primary growth driver. Key factors include:

  • Positive long-term data from ongoing trials may lead to broader regulatory approvals.
  • Increasing awareness among clinicians about therapeutic options for refractory hematologic conditions.
  • Favorable positioning due to oral administration advantages.

Challenges and Risks

  • Safety Concerns: Risks of hepatotoxicity, bone marrow fibrosis, and thromboembolic events mandate careful monitoring and may hinder approval in new indications.
  • Market Competition: Aggressive marketing by competitors like romiplostim and avatrombopag may impact ELSPAR’s market share.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Delays or rejections in new indications could temper revenue growth.

Projected Market Share and Revenue

Assuming successful expansion into aplastic anemia and MDS indications, and considering the existing dominance in cITP, GSK could capture 15-20% of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist market by 2030, translating to revenues surpassing USD 1.5 billion annually.

Conclusion

ELSPAR remains a pivotal therapeutic in thrombocytopenia management, with a robust pipeline and market opportunities. Favorable trial outcomes and strategic positioning could elevate its market share substantially, especially in expanding indications like aplastic anemia. Continued focus on safety profiles and competitive differentiation will be essential for sustained growth.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Advancement: Ongoing trials, particularly in aplastic anemia and MDS, could broaden ELSPAR’s treatment scope, buoying future revenues.
  • Market Position: ELSPAR retains competitive advantages through oral delivery and a proven efficacy profile; however, its growth depends on navigating safety concerns and market competition.
  • Regulatory Strategy: Accelerated approvals based on promising interim data could catalyze market expansion.
  • Market Potential: The global thrombopoietin receptor agonist market is expected to grow at 8% CAGR, with ELSPAR positioned to capture significant share through indications expansion.
  • Strategic Focus: Monitoring clinical outcomes, safety data, and competition will be critical for stakeholders to optimize investment and market entry strategies.

FAQs

1. What are the primary indications for ELSPAR (eltrombopag)?
ELSPAR is primarily approved for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (cITP), aplastic anemia, and hepatitis C-associated thrombocytopenia. Its expanding clinical trial pipeline aims to include additional hematologic conditions.

2. How does ELSPAR compare with its competitors?
ELSPAR offers the convenience of oral administration compared to injectable agents like romiplostim. While it faces competition, its differentiated features and upcoming indications may enhance its market positioning.

3. What safety concerns are associated with ELSPAR?
Potential risks include hepatotoxicity, bone marrow fibrosis, and thromboembolic events. These necessitate vigilant monitoring, especially as new indications are pursued.

4. What is the outlook for ELSPAR in the next five years?
If ongoing trials demonstrate positive outcomes, expanded indications and regulatory approvals could substantially increase ELSPAR’s market share, with projected revenues surpassing USD 1.5 billion annually.

5. How might regional variations affect ELSPAR’s market growth?
North America and Europe currently lead due to healthcare infrastructure and regulatory environment, while Asia-Pacific presents growth opportunities due to increasing disease prevalence and improved healthcare access.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Eltrombopag in Immune Thrombocytopenia," NCT02435468.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Eltrombopag in Refractory Aplastic Anemia," NCT03125654.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). "FDA Approvals for Eltrombopag," 2020.
[4] Industry Reports. "Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists Market Analysis," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.