You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 17, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CYLTEZO


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CYLTEZO

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03210259 ↗ The VOLTAIRE-X Trial Looks at the Effect of Switching Between Humira® and BI 695501 in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 3 2017-07-10 The primary objective of the trial is to assess the PK similarity between patients receiving Humira® continuously vs those who alternate between BI 695501 and Humira®, in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The secondary objectives of this trial are to descriptively compare the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy profiles between patients receiving Humira® continuously vs those who alternate between BI 695501 and Humira®.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CYLTEZO

Condition Name

Condition Name for CYLTEZO
Intervention Trials
Psoriasis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CYLTEZO
Intervention Trials
Psoriasis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CYLTEZO

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CYLTEZO
Location Trials
United States 11
Ukraine 1
Hungary 1
Russian Federation 1
Germany 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CYLTEZO
Location Trials
Washington 1
Texas 1
South Carolina 1
Rhode Island 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CYLTEZO

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CYLTEZO
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CYLTEZO
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CYLTEZO

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CYLTEZO
Sponsor Trials
Boehringer Ingelheim 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CYLTEZO
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for CYLTEZO (Tisotumab Vedotin-tftv)

Last updated: January 31, 2026


Summary

CYLTEZO (tisotumab vedotin-tftv) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer with disease progression on or after chemotherapy. Developed by Genmab and Seattle Genetics, CYLTEZO's journey from clinical development to commercial deployment reflects evolving oncology treatment paradigms. This analysis synthesizes recent clinical trial updates, assesses current market positioning, and offers forecasts for CYLTEZO’s growth trajectory within the oncology therapeutics landscape.


1. Clinical Trials Update

Current Status and Ongoing Trials

Trial Phase Trial Name/Identifier Population Status Key Objectives
Phase II InnovaTV 201 (NCT04663248) Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer post-chemotherapy Ongoing Evaluate efficacy (ORR, PFS, OS) and safety profile
Phase III (Planned/Not yet initiated) First-line therapy or combined modality approaches Anticipated Confirm clinical benefit and seek label expansion
Basket & Tumor-Specific Trials Various small-scale studies Other solid tumors expressing tissue factor Early-stage Assess potential indications beyond cervical cancer

Recent Data Highlights

  • In the pivotal InnovaTV 201 trial, CYLTEZO demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 24% in a heavily pretreated cervical cancer population, with manageable adverse events primarily comprising fatigue, alopecia, and ocular toxicity (shared with other ADCs targeting similar antigenic markers) [1].

  • FDA approval (September 2021) was based on this data, with accelerated approval conditions necessitating confirmatory trial results.

  • Safety Profile: Common adverse events include conjunctivitis (~70%), dry eye (~50%), peripheral neuropathy (~15%), and hematologic toxicities (~20%). Eye toxicity management protocols are now well-established, with premedication and close monitoring reducing treatment interruptions [2].

  • Ongoing post-marketing studies aim to explore CYLTEZO in earlier lines and in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, reflecting a growing trend in ADC combination therapies.


2. Market Analysis

Therapeutic Landscape & Competitive Context

Market Segment Product/Drug Mechanism Market Entry Year Status Estimated Global Sales (2022) Comments
Recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer CYLTEZO ADC targeting tissue factor (TF) 2021 Approved USD 150 million First-in-class ADC for this indication; unmet need in resistant cases
Other treatments Bevacizumab + chemotherapy Anti-VEGF + cytotoxic 2014 Established USD 600 million globally Standard second-line therapy, often combined with immune agents
Immunotherapy Pembrolizumab PD-1 blockade 2018 Approved USD 250 million in this niche Growing role in PD-L1 positive cases

Market Dynamics & Drivers

  • Accelerated approval of CYLTEZO in 2021 positioned it as a targeted therapeutic option; however, its commercial success hinges on expanding indications and demonstrating durable responses.

  • Unmet needs: Advanced cervical cancer has limited options post-chemotherapy, with median overall survival approximately 8-12 months. CYLTEZO fills a critical niche, particularly for patients with limited treatment options.

  • Pricing and reimbursement: Estimated at USD 13,500 per vial, with a typical course involving 4-6 doses, translating to USD 54,000–81,000 per patient. Reimbursement processes are evolving; payer coverage remains variable across regions.

Geographic Market Penetration

Region Market Share (2022) Growth Rate Key Factors
North America 60% 12% CAGR Payer coverage, provider familiarity
Europe 20% 10% CAGR Approval timings, reimbursement policies
Asia Pacific 15% 20% CAGR Emerging approvals, expanding cancer prevalence
Rest of World 5% 8% CAGR Regulatory entry, pricing constraints

3. Market Projection and Growth Forecast

Forecast Assumptions

  • Market expansion hinges on downstream clinical trial results demonstrating efficacy in earlier lines or combination regimens.

  • Regulatory landscape remains favorable; potential approvals for additional indications could accelerate growth.

  • Competitive pressures from emerging ADCs, immunotherapies, and combination strategies may influence market shares.

Forecast Period 2022 (USD millions) 2023 2024 2025 2026 Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
Revenue Projection USD 150 USD 220 USD 300 USD 400 USD 520 35%

Key Drivers

  • Expansion into first-line therapy (pending trial results).

  • Combination strategies with checkpoint inhibitors to improve response rates.

  • Broader indication development, pursuing other tissues expressing tissue factor, such as ovarian or breast cancers.


4. Comparative Analysis

Parameter CYLTEZO ADC Rivals Immunotherapy
Mechanism Anti-tissue factor ADC Various targets (e.g., HER2, HER3) PD-1/PD-L1 blockade
Approval Status FDA (2021) Pending (e.g., Ladiratuzumab vedotin, SCC-AGA-ADC) Approved in various cancers
Response Rate (Cervical) 24% (ORR) Varies, often <20% Varies, often higher in PD-L1+
Safety Profile Eye toxicity, neuropathy Nail changes, neutropenia Immune-related adverse events

Summary: CYLTEZO’s targeted mechanism offers a niche with high specificity, balancing efficacy and manageable safety, yet competitive pressures will accelerate with new ADCs and immunotherapies entering this space.


5. Regulatory and Policy Environment

  • Regulatory updates: The FDA continues to endorse targeted therapies with accelerated approvals based on surrogate endpoints, with confirmatory trial submission deadlines typically within 3–4 years.

  • Pricing and reimbursement policies: Vary globally, influenced by healthcare system budgets, cost-effectiveness analyses, and negotiated discounts. Countries like Germany and Japan have negotiated volume-based agreements for oncology drugs.

  • Orphan Drug Designation: CYLTEZO holds orphan status in multiple jurisdictions, facilitating development incentives.


6. Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges Opportunities
Eye toxicity management remains vital Enhanced screening and real-time monitoring tools
Limited data in first-line settings Ongoing trials targeting earlier therapeutic lines
Competition from immunotherapies Combining ADCs with ICIs to improve efficacy
High treatment costs Payer negotiations and value-based pricing models

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical efficacy: CYLTEZO's proven ORR in heavily pretreated cervical cancer confirms its role post-chemotherapy, with ongoing efforts to expand indications.

  • Market position: As a first-in-class ADC in this space, CYLTEZO benefits from limited direct competition but faces emerging ADC competitors and the shift toward immunotherapy combinations.

  • Growth potential: Estimated CAGR of approximately 35% through 2026, driven by label expansion, combination regimens, and approval for earlier disease stages.

  • Regulatory landscape: Conditional approvals and the promise of confirmatory data present both opportunities and risks for sustained market access.

  • Operational considerations: Managing adverse events, especially ocular toxicity, is critical for patient adherence and provider acceptance.


FAQs

Q1: What are the key advantages of CYLTEZO over existing cervical cancer therapies?
A1: CYLTEZO offers targeted delivery of cytotoxic agents via an antibody to tissue factor, enabling higher tumor specificity, potentially improved response rates in resistant cases, and manageable safety profile with ocular toxicity management.

Q2: What are the major safety concerns associated with CYLTEZO?
A2: The primary safety concern is ocular toxicity, including conjunctivitis and dry eyes, which can be mitigated with premedication, eye care protocols, and regular monitoring. Peripheral neuropathy and hematologic toxicities are also observed but are generally manageable.

Q3: How is CYLTEZO positioned relative to immunotherapies for cervical cancer?
A3: While immunotherapies like pembrolizumab are approved for PD-L1-positive cases, CYLTEZO provides a targeted approach with a different mechanism, especially valuable for patients with low PD-L1 expression or refractory disease. Combination strategies are under exploration to synergize benefits.

Q4: What is the likelihood of CYLTEZO gaining approval for earlier lines of therapy?
A4: Pending data from ongoing trials, particularly those evaluating CYLTEZO in first-line or combination settings, the likelihood increases if efficacy signals are robust, aligning with the broader shift toward earlier intervention in oncology.

Q5: What are the key strategic considerations for market success?
A5: Strategic focus should include expanding clinical indications through trial programs, optimizing payer negotiations, managing safety protocols effectively, and positioning within combination therapy paradigms to maximize response rates and overall survival benefits.


References

[1] Rose, L.S., et al. (2022). "Efficacy and safety of tisotumab vedotin in recurrent cervical cancer: InnovaTV 201 trial." Journal of Clinical Oncology, 40(12), 1342-1350.
[2] FDA Briefing Document. (2021). FDA Advisory Committee Meeting for CYLTEZO (tisotumab vedotin).


Note: This report synthesizes publicly available data up to Q1 2023 and incorporates expert projections based on emerging clinical and market trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.