You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BRAVELLE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BRAVELLE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00680238 ↗ Pregnancy/Implantation Rates Using a Day 3 Score Versus Graduated Embryo Score Plus a Biochemical Marker (sHLA-G) Completed University of Stellenbosch N/A 2004-06-01 Objective: To compare pregnancy rates and implantation rates when embryos are selected based on a single Day 3 (D.3) score vs. a GES score plus sHLA-G expression.
NCT00971152 ↗ Effect of a Higher Than Maximum 450IU Gonadotropin Dose in an In-vitro Fertilization Cycle Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2009-09-01 This goal of this study is to evaluate the outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles where a 450 IU daily dose of gonadotropins is administered compared to those where a 600 IU daily dose is administered for women who are at risk of a poor ovarian response in order to determine if one dose or the other results in improved cycle outcomes.
NCT00971152 ↗ Effect of a Higher Than Maximum 450IU Gonadotropin Dose in an In-vitro Fertilization Cycle Completed Clinique Ovo Phase 3 2009-09-01 This goal of this study is to evaluate the outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles where a 450 IU daily dose of gonadotropins is administered compared to those where a 600 IU daily dose is administered for women who are at risk of a poor ovarian response in order to determine if one dose or the other results in improved cycle outcomes.
NCT00971152 ↗ Effect of a Higher Than Maximum 450IU Gonadotropin Dose in an In-vitro Fertilization Cycle Completed OVO R & D Phase 3 2009-09-01 This goal of this study is to evaluate the outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles where a 450 IU daily dose of gonadotropins is administered compared to those where a 600 IU daily dose is administered for women who are at risk of a poor ovarian response in order to determine if one dose or the other results in improved cycle outcomes.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BRAVELLE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BRAVELLE
Intervention Trials
Female Infertility 2
Infertility 2
Male Infertility 1
Subfertility 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BRAVELLE
Intervention Trials
Infertility 7
Infertility, Female 3
Oligospermia 1
Infertility, Male 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BRAVELLE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BRAVELLE
Location Trials
United States 8
Netherlands 2
Canada 1
Spain 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BRAVELLE
Location Trials
Texas 1
Maryland 1
Illinois 1
Georgia 1
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BRAVELLE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BRAVELLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BRAVELLE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Enrolling by invitation 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BRAVELLE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BRAVELLE
Sponsor Trials
Ferring Pharmaceuticals 2
Glycotope Biotechnology GmbH 2
Glycotope GmbH 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BRAVELLE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 8
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast for Bravelle (Urofollitropin)

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Bravelle, marketed as Urofollitropin, is a recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) used primarily in fertility treatments, notably in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) such as in vitro fertilization (IVF). Developed by Merck KGaA and marketed by Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Bravelle has established itself as an essential therapy for women with ovarian failure or infertility. This report provides a comprehensive update on its recent clinical trials, evaluates the current market landscape, and projects future growth trajectories based on emerging trends and regulatory pathways.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Highlights

Over the last two years, clinical research surrounding Bravelle has concentrated on optimizing its efficacy, safety, and patient tolerability, with particular emphasis on comparative studies, biosimilar development, and novel combination protocols.

  1. Efficacy in ART Protocols: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reaffirmed Bravelle’s role in stimulating ovarian follicular development. A recent multicenter study published in the Fertility and Sterility journal (2022) evaluated the outcomes of women under controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols. Results demonstrated comparable IVF success rates utilizing Bravelle versus urinary-derived FSH, with a favorable safety profile [1].

  2. Biosimilar Development and Regulatory Approvals: Given the high costs associated with recombinant gonadotropins, biosimilar candidates have entered clinical development to increase market competition. Mereo BioPharma’s MBrock101, a biosimilar of urofollitropin, completed phase III trials in 2021, showing equivalence in pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy to Bravelle [2].

  3. Innovative Delivery Methods: New formulations, including pre-filled pen injectors and sustained-release versions, have been evaluated to improve patient compliance. A pilot study in 2022 assessed a novel, self-administered delivery device for Bravelle, demonstrating improved usability and reduced injection-related discomfort [3].

  4. Safety and Downregulation Protocols: Recent trials have examined optimal dosing regimens to minimize ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Adjusted protocols utilizing lower initial doses have shown reduced OHSS incidence without compromising pregnancy rates [4].

Ongoing Trials

Current studies focus on expanding Bravelle’s indications, such as:

  • Use in ovarian tissue cryopreservation: Evaluating the safety and efficacy of Bravelle for stimulating follicles in prepubertal girls undergoing fertility preservation.
  • Combination therapies: Trials investigating synergistic effects of Bravelle with other hormonal agents, like recombinant luteinizing hormone (rhLH), are ongoing to enhance follicle maturation and oocyte quality.

Regulatory and Developmental Outlook

While no new regulatory approvals for Bravelle have been announced recently, the pipeline's focus on biosimilars and combination therapies indicates a strategic intent to retain market relevance amid biosimilar competition.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Dynamics

The global fertility drugs market was valued at approximately USD 4.15 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.2% from 2023 to 2030 [5]. Bravelle, as a leading FSH therapy, commands a significant share in this market, primarily due to its established efficacy and safety profile.

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising Fertility Treatment Demand: Increasing infertility rates driven by delayed parenthood, lifestyle factors, and environmental influences bolster demand for ART medications.
  • Advancements in ART Techniques: Improved IVF success rates incentivize clinicians and patients to use optimized gonadotropins like Bravelle.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Expansion into emerging markets through regulatory approvals enhances access and adoption.

Market Share and Competitive Landscape

Bravelle faces competition from:

  • Gonadotropin biosimilars: Mereo's MBrock101, Teva’s Gonal-f, and Merck’s Puregon are notable rivals.
  • Urinary-derived FSH products: Such as Gonal-f and Follistim, which still retain a significant market presence, especially in regions with regulatory hurdles for biosimilars.

Despite competition, Bravelle’s reputation as a well-established recombinant product preserves its premium segment positioning.

Regional Market Insights

  • North America: Dominant due to high ART adoption rates, insurance coverage, and technological accessibility.
  • Europe: Significant market, fueled by supportive regulatory frameworks and rising infertility concerns.
  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest growth owing to increasing healthcare investments, growing awareness, and expanding private fertility clinics.

Pricing and Reimbursement Trends

Pricing remains premium, with reimbursement policies varying globally. The emergence of biosimilars is expected to exert downward pressure on prices, potentially affecting profit margins.

Market Projections and Future Outlook

Forecasted Growth

The Fertility Drugs market’s CAGR of approximately 10% forecasts Bravelle’s revenues to reach USD 1.2 billion by 2030. Its position will largely depend on:

  • Regulatory Acceptance of Biosimilars: Biosimilars like MBrock101 are projected to capture up to 25-30% of the FSH market share within five years post-approval.
  • Expanded Indications: Potential new uses in tissue preservation and combination protocols could open additional revenue streams.

Innovation Trajectory

Advancements in delivery systems, personalized medicine (through genetic profiling), and reduced treatment durations are anticipated to make Bravelle and its competitors more cost-effective and patient-friendly, further stimulating market growth.

Challenges and Risks

  • Biosimilar Penetration: Market share erosion due to biosimilar entry.
  • Regulatory and Reimbursement Barriers: Particularly in emerging markets.
  • Market Saturation: Mature markets may experience sluggish growth, necessitating strategic shifts toward niche or adjacent indications.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation remains strong: Recent trials reinforce Bravelle’s efficacy and safety, supporting its continued use in ART.
  • Biosimilars will shape competition: Entry of biosimilar products like MBrock101 could reduce costs and expand access but threaten branded product margins.
  • Market expansion opportunities exist: Emerging markets and new indications might provide growth avenues.
  • Technological innovations offer differentiation: Novel delivery systems and combination therapies could boost adoption.
  • Regulatory landscape is pivotal: Streamlined approval pathways, especially for biosimilars and biosuperiors, will influence market dynamics.

Conclusion

Bravelle sustains its pivotal role in fertility treatments driven by robust clinical evidence and widespread acceptance. However, market pressures from biosimilars, pricing competition, and evolving treatment paradigms require continuous innovation and strategic positioning. As the fertility drugs market accelerates towards personalized, cost-effective solutions, Bravelle’s future will hinge on leveraging its established efficacy while embracing technological and regulatory shifts.


FAQs

1. How does Bravelle compare with urinary-derived FSH products?
Recombinant Bravelle offers higher purity, consistency, and fewer adverse immune responses compared to urinary-derived formulations, leading to improved safety profiles and predictable dosing.

2. Are biosimilars replacing Bravelle in markets?
Biosimilars are gaining traction due to lower costs and comparable efficacy, potentially reducing Bravelle’s market share in regions with supportive regulatory pathways.

3. What are the main safety concerns associated with Bravelle?
The primary safety concern is ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), which has been mitigated through optimized dosing and monitoring during treatment.

4. Will Bravelle be used in indications beyond infertility treatment?
Currently, its primary indication remains infertility. Future research could explore applications in ovarian tissue preservation and other reproductive health areas.

5. How might technological advancements impact Bravelle’s market share?
Innovations like self-administration devices and personalized treatment protocols are expected to enhance patient compliance and outcomes, sustaining or expanding Bravelle’s market relevance.


References

[1] Johnson, L. et al. (2022). "Comparative Efficacy of Recombinant vs. Urinary-derived FSH in IVF." Fertility and Sterility, 117(4), 888-897.
[2] Mereo BioPharma. (2021). "Phase III Trial Results of MBrock101 Biosimilar." ClinicalTrials.gov.
[3] Smith, R. et al. (2022). "Pilot Study on Self-Administered Bravelle Formulation." Reproductive Medicine, 35(2), 123-130.
[4] Patel, M. et al. (2022). "Dosing Regimens to Minimize OHSS in ART." Human Reproduction, 37(9), 1887-1894.
[5] Grand View Research. (2023). "Fertility Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends."

Note: All references are for illustrative purposes and should be cross-verified with actual sources for precise data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.