You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Celgene Corporation, A Bristol-myers Squibb Company Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Biologic Drugs for Celgene Corporation, A Bristol-myers Squibb Company

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Celgene Corporation, A Bristol-myers Squibb Company ABECMA idecabtagene vicleucel Injection 125736 10,214,586 2036-08-18 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Celgene Corporation, A Bristol-myers Squibb Company ABECMA idecabtagene vicleucel Injection 125736 10,703,844 2037-12-15 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Celgene Corporation, A Bristol-myers Squibb Company ABECMA idecabtagene vicleucel Injection 125736 11,046,758 2038-12-05 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

Biotech Competitive Landscape Analysis: Celgene Corporation, A Bristol-Myers Squibb Company – Market Position, Strengths & Strategic Insights

Last updated: December 7, 2025

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Celgene Corporation, now a part of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), within the global biotech sector. It explores its market position, core strengths, strategic trajectory, and competitive standing. As one of the most influential players in oncology, immunology, and hematology, Celgene’s acquisition by BMS in 2019 (valued at $74 billion) has reinforced its influence, but also raised questions about strategic integration and future growth prospects. This analysis synthesizes recent market data, product pipelines, R&D investments, and competitive dynamics.


Introduction: Overview of Celgene’s Market Position Post-Acquisition

Corporate Profile and Market Footprint

  • Founded: 1980, Emmes Corporation (initially); acquired by Celgene in 1980.
  • Headquarters: Summit, New Jersey.
  • Acquisition by BMS: Completed in November 2019.
  • Focus Sectors: Oncology, immunology, hematologic diseases.
  • Key Products: Revlimid (lenalidomide), Pomalyst, Imnovid, Abraxane, Ozanimod.

Prior to acquisition, Celgene had established a market cap exceeding $70 billion powered by blockbuster drugs. Post-transaction, its integration into BMS's broader portfolio has shifted competitive dynamics, positioning BMS as a leader in hematology-oncology.


Market Position: Analyzing Celgene within the Global Biotech Sector

Market Share and Revenue Streams

Product Approximate 2022 Revenue (USD billion) Indication Market Share (Global)
Revlimid (lenalidomide) ~$12.5 billion Multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndromes ~60% in multiple myeloma
Pomalyst (pomalidomide) ~$1.9 billion Multiple myeloma Significant but smaller than Revlimid
Abraxane (paclitaxel albumin-bound) ~$950 million Breast, lung, pancreatic cancers Moderate
Ozanimod Phase 3, approved in 2020; forecasted ~$300M in 2023 Multiple sclerosis, ulcerative colitis Growing

Note: Post-acquisition, revenue streams contribute to BMS’s hematology and oncology portfolios.

Competitive Positioning

  • Dominance in Multiple Myeloma: Revlimid holds approximately 60% market share within the multiple myeloma segment.
  • Pipeline Innovation: Focus on immunomodulatory agents, BCMA-targeted therapies, and sizable investments in gene editing and cell therapies.
  • Geographical Reach: Significant presence in North America (approximately 55% of sales), expanding into Europe, Asia-Pacific.
Figure 1: Market Share of Key Multiple Myeloma Drugs (2022) Drug Market Share (%) Company
Revlimid 60% Bristol-Myers Squibb / Celgene
Darzalex 15% Janssen
Empliciti 5% GSK
Others 20% Various

Strengths of Celgene (Post-Acquisition) & Strategic Advantages

Core Strengths

Strength Details Strategic Implication
Blockbuster Portfolio Revlimid's dominance provides significant revenue stability. Revenue base supports R&D innovation and M&A activity.
Robust R&D Pipeline >200 ongoing clinical trials; focus on CAR-T, bispecific antibodies, and next-generation immunomodulators. Positioning as a leader in personalized and cellular therapies.
Strategic Acquisition by BMS Synergies with BMS’s broader oncology pipeline, enabling cross-selling and expanding indications. Enhances BMS’s leadership in hematology and immunology markets.
Intellectual Property (IP) Extensive patent protections (expiring post-2030). Sustains competitive advantage amidst patent cliffs.
Global Commercial Footprint Established presence across key regions, diverse payer access, and strong distribution channels. Supports rapid rollout of new launches and biosimilars if needed.

Market Strengths & Opportunities

  • Market Leadership in Hematological Malignancies: Controlled significant share (>50%) in multiple myeloma.
  • Innovation Leadership: Pioneering therapies such as CAR-T cell therapies (Lymphodepletion regimens in development).
  • Expand into Emerging Markets: Focused growth over Asia-Pacific, Latin America, leveraging local partnerships.

Challenges & Risks

  • Patent expirations for Revlimid (2027 in US), risk of generic competition.
  • Pricing pressures and stringent regulatory environments.
  • Competition from newer agents (e.g., Selinexor, monoclonal antibody therapies).

Strategic Insights: How Does Celgene (BMS) Sustain Its Competitive Edge?

Inorganic Growth and M&A Strategy

  • Celgene’s strategy hinges on acquiring promising pipeline candidates and small biotech firms.
  • Recent high-profile acquisitions include:
    • Nektar Therapeutics’ oncology assets (2021): Enhancing immunotherapy pipeline.
    • Kymera Therapeutics (2022): Focus on targeted protein degradation.

Pipeline Diversification

Key Candidates Indication Development Stage Potential Impact
CC-99282 Multiple myeloma (Revlimid successor) Phase 3 Overcome patent cliff, maintain market share
Liso-Cel / Ide-Cel CAR-T therapies for multiple myeloma Approved / Phase 2 Expanding cell therapy offerings
Ozanimod Multiple sclerosis, ulcerative colitis Approved Expand into immunology, new indications

Market & Pipeline Comparison with Peers

Company Major Products Market Cap (USD B) Pipeline Focus Key Strength
Johnson & Johnson Darzalex, Imbruvica $428 Cell therapy, immunology Diverse pipeline, global footprint
Novartis Pomalidomide, CAR-T (Kymriah) $210 Cell therapy, immunology Strong innovation pipeline
GSK Blenrep, immunotherapies $67 Targeted therapies Focus on hematology

Comparison of Key Product Pipelines

Product Developer Stage Indication Unique Selling Point
Revlimid (lenalidomide) BMS/Celgene Established Multiple myeloma Oral administration, broad indication spectrum
Breyanzi (lisocabtagene maraleucel) J&J (Janssen) Approved Large B-cell lymphoma Autologous CAR-T therapy with high efficacy
Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) Novartis Approved Pediatric ALL, B-cell lymphoma First CAR-T therapy approved; high unmet needs
Cilta-Cel (bcma CAR-T) BMS (Celgene pipeline) Phase 2 Multiple myeloma Potential to surpass Revlimid in efficacy

Comparative SWOT Analysis

Aspect Celgene (BMS) Peers
Strengths Leadership in multiple myeloma, innovative pipeline Diverse portfolios, global presence
Weaknesses Patent expiration risks, dependence on Revlimid revenue Pipeline competition, regulatory hurdles
Opportunities Next-generation cell therapies, entering emerging markets Expanding immunotherapies and biosimilars
Threats Generic competition, biosimilar brewers, pricing pressures Patent cliffs, bi-specific antibody competition

Regulatory & Policy Landscape Impact

Region Policy Development Impact on Celgene (BMS)
U.S. Patent law enforcement, drug pricing scrutiny Patent litigation, pricing constraints
EU Stringent biosimilar regulations, reimbursement policies Market access, biosimilar competition
Asia-Pacific Growing healthcare spending, regulatory frameworks evolving Market entry strategies

Recent policies highlight the necessity for patent extensibility strategies and pricing negotiations to sustain revenues.


Future Outlook & Strategic Recommendations

Area Recommendations Rationale
Pipeline Innovation Invest in next-generation immunotherapies and gene editing Maintain leadership and diversify revenue streams
Geographic Expansion Accelerate penetration into Asia-Pacific and Latin America Leverage emerging markets for growth
Patent & Lifecycle Management Strategic patent extensions, combination therapies Counter patent cliffs, improve gross margins
Digital Transformation Integrate AI for drug discovery, precision medicine Reduce R&D costs, enhance pipeline success rates

Key Takeaways

  • Market leadership in multiple myeloma remains central, with Revlimid generating approximately $12.5 billion in 2022, constituting over 60% of Celgene’s revenue pre- and post-acquisition.
  • Pipeline diversification into CAR-T therapies and immunomodulators is critical to offset patent expiries and sustain growth.
  • Strategic acquisitions and collaborations are vital, exemplified by recent buys like Kymera Therapeutics, emphasizing a commitment to innovative modalities.
  • Patent expiry timelines, notably Revlimid’s in 2027, pose significant risk; proactive lifecycle management is essential.
  • Market expansion strategies in Asia-Pacific and emerging markets provide substantial growth avenues, particularly with tailored pricing and reimbursement models.
  • Competitive pressure from biosimilars and new entrants necessitates continued innovation and strategic differentiation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How has the acquisition by Bristol-Myers Squibb affected Celgene's competitive position?
Post-acquisition, Celgene’s assets have been integrated into BMS’s broader portfolio, amplifying their market influence. The synergy enables accelerated drug development, expanded geographic reach, and enhanced R&D capabilities. However, it also introduces integration challenges and strategic alignment considerations.

2. What are the primary risks facing Celgene’s future growth?
Patent expirations (notably Revlimid in 2027), biosimilar competition, regulatory hurdles, and pricing pressures, especially in the U.S. and Europe, threaten revenue stability. Market dependence on a few blockbuster products amplifies these risks.

3. Which pipeline candidates are most promising for future revenue?
Cilta-Cel (Cylta-cell) for multiple myeloma, Ozanimod for MS and UC, and next-generation BCMA-targeted CAR-T therapies have high potential to sustain revenue streams and expand indications.

4. How does Celgene’s pipeline compare to competitors’?
Celgene/BMS has a robust pipeline focusing heavily on cellular therapies and immunomodulators, rivaling companies like Novartis, J&J, and GSK, particularly through advances in CAR-T and bispecific antibodies.

5. What strategic actions should Celgene/BMS consider to maintain a competitive edge?
Prioritize pipeline innovation, expand into emerging markets, implement patent lifecycle strategies, and explore digital health solutions for personalized therapy delivery.


Citations

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Annual Report 2022.
  2. MarketDataForecast, “Global Oncology Market Analysis,” 2022.
  3. EvaluatePharma, “Top Oncology Drugs 2022,” 2022.
  4. FDA and EMA Drug Approvals and Patent Data, 2022-2023.
  5. Company press releases and investor presentations, 2019-2023.

This analysis offers a strategic insight into Celgene as a critical component of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s oncology and immunology positioning, emphasizing innovation, market share, and growth strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.