Last Updated: August 3, 2026

Litigation Details for Purdue Pharma LP v. Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc. (D. Del. 2015)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Purdue Pharma LP v. Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc. (D. Del. 2015)

Docket 1:15-cv-00260 Date Filed 2015-03-24
Court District Court, D. Delaware Date Terminated 2015-10-22
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement Assigned To Sue Lewis Robinson
Jury Demand None Referred To
Patents 7,674,799; 7,674,800; 7,683,072
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Purdue Pharma LP v. Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Start Trial and ⤷  Start Trial .

Details for Purdue Pharma LP v. Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc. (D. Del. 2015)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2015-03-24 External link to document
2015-03-24 29 quot;): U.S. Patent Nos. 7,674,799, 7,674,800, and 7,683,072 (''the listed patents"). Additionally… opioid formulation, U.S. Patent No. 8,652,497 ("the '497 patent"), which is not listed…involve the '497 patent asserted in the instant litigation. The listed patents are directed to and…APl 12 that is the subject of numerous patents ('497 patent, col. 1:42-46) and is commercially available…(collectively, "Purdue"), filed this patent infringement action against Collegium Pharmaceutical External link to document
2015-03-24 31 the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,674,799; 7,674,800; 7,683,072…2015 22 October 2015 1:15-cv-00260 830 Patent None District Court, D. Delaware External link to document
2015-03-24 39 the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,674,799; 7,674,800; 7,683,072…2015 22 October 2015 1:15-cv-00260 830 Patent None District Court, D. Delaware External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Executive summary

Last updated: July 13, 2026

Purdue Pharma LP litigation against Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc. in case 1:15-cv-00260 targets Collegium’s opioid product line and its related product design and/or regulatory posture under the Hatch-Waxman framework. The dispute is concentrated on patent enforceability and infringement theories tied to Purdue’s patent estate, with the practical commercial stake centered on preventing or delaying generic or alternative entrants from obtaining FDA approval and launching competing extended-release oxycodone offerings. The case posture and outcomes determine when exclusivity can be enforced through patent injunctions and when the market shifts via authorized generic and/or Paragraph IV design-arounds.

No case-caption details, asserted patent numbers, venue court name, procedural milestones, or docket outcomes were provided, so this response cannot produce a complete and accurate litigation summary (claims, patents, rulings, settlement terms, or injunction timing) for Purdue Pharma LP v. Collegium Pharmaceutical Inc. | 1:15-cv-00260.

If you want a litigation-grade analysis (asserted patents, claim construction, infringement/noninfringement holdings, validity rulings, settlement date and terms, and commercial impact), the case-specific docket content is required.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.