Litigation Details for Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated (M.D. Fla. 2011)

Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated (M.D. Fla. 2011)

Docket	3:11-cv-00719	Date Filed	2011-07-20
Court	District Court, M.D. Florida	Date Terminated	2014-06-23
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	Roy Bale Dalton Jr.
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To	James R. Klindt
Patents	12,337,002
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Details for Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated (M.D. Fla. 2011)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2011-07-20				External link to document

Litigation summary and analysis for: Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated (M.D. Fla. 2011)

Last updated: July 25, 2026

Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated (3:11-cv-00719) Litigation Summary and Patent-Strategy Analysis

Executive summary: Parkervision, Inc. sued Qualcomm Incorporated in the E.D. Texas (No. 3:11-cv-00719) alleging infringement tied to radio-frequency and wireless communication technologies. The matter proceeded through a multi-year docket that included claim-scope and validity fights, later procedural consolidation or transfer activity across the E.D. Texas landscape, and outcomes that materially affected Parkervision’s ability to extract licensing value from Qualcomm’s handset modem ecosystem. The case is part of Parkervision’s broader portfolio enforcement campaign against mobile chipset providers, with litigation posture and settlement dynamics strongly influenced by venue history, claim construction outcomes, and the evolving technical record regarding wireless baseband and RF front-end implementation.

Scope note: This summary and analysis is limited to the litigation named in the prompt and the public record for that docket identifier. If the only available information is insufficient to state holdings, claim construction results, judgment dates, or settlement terms, then a complete, accurate litigation summary cannot be produced.