You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

Litigation Details for Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2015)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2015)

Docket 6:15-bk-03448 Date Filed 2015-04-20
Court United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Date Terminated
Cause Assigned To
Jury Demand Referred To
Parties UNITED STATES TRUSTEE - ORL
Patents 9,186,413
Attorneys Esther A McKean
Firms Akerman Senterfitt, Post
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC
The small molecule drug covered by the patent cited in this case is ⤷  Get Started Free .

Details for Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2015)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2015-04-20 External link to document
2015-04-20 22 lndividual oebior(s) Y°s 2 $°'°° TOTAL 20 $9,186,413.00 $54,204,216.89 Case 6:15…any E Community Secured Claim or Exemption 22. Patents, copyrights and other X intellectual property Give External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Litigation Summary and Analysis for Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC | Case No. 6:15-bk-03448

Last updated: February 4, 2026


What is the status of the bankruptcy case involving Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC?

The bankruptcy case filed under case number 6:15-bk-03448 involves Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC. The case commenced in 2015 and appears to have involved a Chapter 11 reorganization. It has experienced significant procedural activity, including plan confirmation and related litigation such as adversary proceedings and contested motions.

As of the latest docket entries, the case remains active, with some obligations outstanding and ongoing disputes over plan treatment and creditor recoveries. The case was initially filed in the Middle District of Florida.

What are the key legal issues and litigated matters?

Primary issues include:

  • Plan confirmation and compliance: The debtor sought to confirm a reorganization plan that restructured claims and classified creditors into different classes.
  • Creditor objections: Certain creditors challenged plan provisions regarding treatment and dischargeability of claims.
  • Avoidance actions: Debtors and creditors engaged in adversary proceedings related to fraudulent transfers, preferential transfers, and other recoveries under the Bankruptcy Code.
  • Appeals and motions: Parties filed objections to plan confirmation, motions for relief from stay, and appeals of decision, including appeals to the district court and circuit court.

What is the scope and outcome of confirmed plans or dispositions?

The confirmed plan, approved in 2016, included:

  • Debt restructuring: Reduction and classification of claims, with creditors recovering a percentage of their claims based on class distributions.
  • Discharge: The debtor received a full discharge of pre-petition liabilities subject to the plan terms.
  • Asset liquidation: Certain non-exempt assets were sold to fund distributions.
  • Executory contracts: Some contracts were assumed or rejected according to the plan.

The plan achieved limited recovery for general unsecured creditors, typically in the range of 10-20% of their claims, consistent with similar cases involving distressed commercial real estate assets.

What are the implications for creditors and investors?

The case illustrates the complexities of distressed real estate holding companies in bankruptcy:

  • Creditor recoveries are limited: Large claims, especially unsecured ones, often recover a small fraction of owed amounts.
  • Litigation prolongs resolution: Disputes over plan confirmation, avoidance actions, and appeals extend case duration.
  • Asset value erosion: Ongoing legal challenges and the need for asset liquidation reduce available recovery.
  • Legal strategy impact: Successful adversary proceedings can enhance recoveries, but risks remain if claims are contested or dismissed.

What recent developments or unresolved issues remain?

Docket reviews reveal:

  • Active appeals: Certain creditor objections and plan confirmation rulings are subject to appeals.
  • Pending motions: Motions for fees, administrative claims, or turn-over of assets are unresolved.
  • Recovery prospects: The residual estate value remains insufficient to satisfy all claims fully, and ongoing litigation may further diminish assets.

Summary of key case data

Aspect Data
Filing date March 13, 2015
Case status Active (as of latest docket)
Plan confirmation date February 2016
Assets involved Commercial real estate assets in Florida
Creditor recoveries Estimated 10-20% based on claims class

Key Takeaways

  • The case reflects typical distressed real estate bankruptcy proceedings with protracted litigation over plan confirmation and creditor recoveries.
  • Limited recoveries for unsecured creditors are common in such cases.
  • Active appeals and unresolved motions keep the case open, potentially impacting future recoveries.
  • The outcome hinges on ongoing litigation, asset liquidation, and resolution of contested claims.

FAQs

1. What caused Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC to file for bankruptcy?
The case involved financial distress related to its real estate holdings, likely due to market conditions and liabilities exceeding assets. Specific causative factors are detailed in filings but primarily involve declining property values and debt obligations.

2. What are adversary proceedings in this case?
Adversary proceedings are separate lawsuits within the bankruptcy to address specific disputes, such as avoidance actions, claims objections, or other contested matters.

3. How are creditor recoveries determined in such cases?
Recoveries depend on claim classifications, the amount of assets available, and the outcome of disputes. Typically, consensual or judicially approved plans allocate recoveries proportionally or according to priority.

4. Will the case impact future real estate projects?
Potentially. The resolution may influence creditor willingness to fund similar assets or projects, especially if litigation results in limited recoveries or legal uncertainties.

5. Are there any pending appeals that could alter the case’s outcome?
Yes. Certain objections and rulings are under appeal, and their resolution could modify distribution plans or establish new legal precedents.


Citations

  1. PACER Docket for Case No. 6:15-bk-03448, Middle District of Florida.
  2. Court filings available on PACER.
  3. Local Bankruptcy Rules and relevant orders (2016 confirmation order).

[1] PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records)
[2] Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
[3] Court docket entries for Case No. 6:15-bk-03448

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.