Last Updated: August 3, 2026

Litigation Details for ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA (D.N.J. 2018)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA (D.N.J. 2018)

Docket 3:18-cv-10952 Date Filed 2018-06-22
Court District Court, D. New Jersey Date Terminated 2019-06-24
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement Assigned To Freda L. Wolfson
Jury Demand Plaintiff Referred To Tonianne J. Bongiovanni
Patents 7,229,636; 7,404,489; 7,879,349; 8,003,353; 8,940,714; 9,415,007
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷  Start Trial .

Details for ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA (D.N.J. 2018)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2018-06-22 External link to document
2018-06-22 1 U.S. Patent No. 7,229,636, # 2 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 7,404,489, # 3 Exhibit C - U.S. Patent No. …U.S. Patent No. 8,003,353, # 5 Exhibit E - U.S. Patent No. 8,940,714, # 6 Exhibit F - U.S. Patent No. … COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt…2018 24 June 2019 3:18-cv-10952 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) Plaintiff External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Litigation summary and analysis for: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA (D.N.J. 2018)

Last updated: June 27, 2026

Litigation summary: ENDO Pharmaceuticals v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings (D.N.J. 3:18-cv-10952)

Executive summary: In ENDO Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Lupin Atlantis Holdings SA, 3:18-cv-10952 (D.N.J.), ENDO alleged that Lupin infringed and/or induced infringement of ENDO’s asserted U.S. patents tied to END0’s branded product(s) by filing an ANDA for a generic version and seeking FDA approval before patent expiration. The case is in the ANDA Paragraph IV framework typical of Hatch-Waxman disputes, with the litigation record centered on claim construction, infringement (direct/induced/contributory), invalidity (anticipation/obviousness), and potential settlement.

Note: A complete, citation-grade litigation summary requires docket-level specifics (patent numbers asserted, ANDA number, dates of claim construction and dispositive rulings, final judgment and any settlement). If those case-document details are not available in the provided record, a precise litigation summary cannot be produced.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.