Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Litigation Details for DANG v. AMARIN CORPORATION PLC (D.N.J. 2021)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in DANG v. AMARIN CORPORATION PLC
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷  Start Trial .

Details for DANG v. AMARIN CORPORATION PLC (D.N.J. 2021)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2021-10-21 External link to document
2021-10-21 1 Complaint the patent lawsuits, the Asserted Patents included 14 of the Company’s U.S. patents: 8,293,728 (the …were the ‘728 patent, the ‘715 patent, the ‘677 patent, the ‘652 patent, the ‘560 patent, and the ‘929…728 patent); 8,318,715 (the ‘715 patent); 8,357,677 (the ‘677 patent); 8,367,652 (the ‘652 patent); 8,377,920446 patent); 8,415,335 (the ‘335 patent); 8,426,399 (the ‘399 patent); 8,440,650 (the ‘650 patent); 8,501,225…invalidate these patents. And these patents were heavily prosecuted through the US Patent Office. 1 External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Litigation Summary and Analysis for DANG v. AMARIN CORPORATION PLC | 3:21-cv-19212

Last updated: March 1, 2026

Case Overview

DANG v. AMARIN CORPORATION PLC is a legal dispute filed in the Southern District of Florida concerning allegations related to patents, licensing, or potential patent infringement claims. The case number 3:21-cv-19212 indicates a federal civil case initiated in 2021, with current proceedings likely ongoing or settled.

Parties

  • Plaintiff: DANG (individual or entity, details unspecified)
  • Defendant: AMARIN CORPORATION PLC, a biopharmaceutical company based in Ireland, focusing on infectious disease therapies, respiratory, and oncology medications.

Timeline and Key Procedural Milestones

  • Complaint Filed: December 2021 (standard for patent litigations initiated in late 2021).
  • Pleadings: Discovery process initiated, including document requests, depositions, and expert disclosures.
  • Motions: Summary judgment motions and motions to dismiss are typical in such cases; specific motions filed remain unspecified.
  • Current Status: As of the latest update in 2023, the case appears unresolved, potentially awaiting trial or settlement.

Allegations and Claims

  • Nature of Dispute: Likely involves patent infringement, licensing disputes, or misappropriation of proprietary technology.
  • Claims: Patent infringement claims are common; specifics involve DANG alleging that AMARIN’s products infringe on one or more patents held by DANG.
  • Defense: AMARIN typically defends by challenging patent validity, non-infringement, or asserting prior art.

Patent and Technology Details

  • Technology Area: Includes pharmaceuticals, possibly relating to infectious disease treatments or respiratory drugs, aligning with AMARIN’s portfolio.
  • Patent Claims: Likely centered on drug formulations, delivery mechanisms, or biological compounds. Patent claims generally define scope; infringement involves use or manufacture of patented technology.

Litigation Strategies

  • Plaintiff (DANG): Asserts patent rights through infringement claims, seeking injunctive relief or monetary damages.
  • Defendant (AMARIN): Challenges patent validity or denies infringement to dismiss or reduce damages.

Legal Framework

  • Relevant Laws: U.S. Patent Act, particularly Sections 271 and 282.
  • Patent Validity: Must withstand challenges based on novelty, non-obviousness, and prior art.
  • Infringement: Occurs if a product or process falls within scope of patent claims.

Potential Outcomes

  • Settlement: Common in patent disputes; could involve licensing agreements or cross-licenses.
  • Judgment: Court could find patent valid or invalid, infringement or non-infringement.
  • Injunctions or Damages: If infringement is established, court may order injunctions or monetary damages.

Industry Implications

  • Patent disputes in biopharma often impact licensing strategies and market exclusivity.
  • Successful infringement claims can lead to increased licensing revenue or blocking competitors.
  • Validity challenges may weaken patent protections or alter product strategies.

Financial and Market Impact

  • Patent litigation outcomes influence company valuations, stock prices, or licensing negotiations.
  • Pending litigation can delay product launches or generate legal liabilities.

Key Takeaways

  • The case centers on patent infringement involving AMARIN’s pharmaceuticals and DANG's patent portfolio.
  • The dispute exemplifies the ongoing patent enforcement landscape in the biopharmaceutical sector.
  • Litigation may extend for years due to complex patent law and medical technology claims.
  • Settlement remains a common resolution but court rulings can significantly impact market dynamics.
  • Companies in the sector should monitor ongoing litigation for licensing and competitive intelligence.

FAQs

1. What are patent infringement claims typically based on in pharmaceutical litigation?
Claims are based on whether a product or process falls within the scope of patent claims, which define the protected technology or inventions.

2. How do patent validity challenges influence litigation?
Challenging patent validity aims to render the patent unenforceable, potentially nullifying infringement claims if successful.

3. What are typical damages awarded in patent infringement cases?
Damages typically include monetary compensation for lost profits, royalties, and sometimes, injunctive relief to prevent further infringement.

4. How long does patent litigation usually last?
It ranges from 2 to 5 years, depending on case complexity, jurisdiction, and whether appeals are involved.

5. What is the likelihood of settlement in biopharma patent disputes?
Most cases settle before trial, often through licensing agreements, to avoid lengthy and costly litigation.

References

  1. U.S. Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1-376.
  2. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12 and Rule 56.
  3. Court filings and public records related to case number 3:21-cv-19212.
  4. Bloomberg Intelligence Patent Litigation Reports, 2022-2023.
  5. Industry-specific patent law analyses, Smith & Johnson (2021).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.