Last Updated: August 3, 2026

Litigation Details for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2020)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷  Start Trial .

Details for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2020)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2020-07-24 External link to document
2020-07-24 14 Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner of Patents the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,659,285 B2 ;US 7,923,564 …July 2020 7 May 2024 1:20-cv-00986 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
2020-07-24 4 Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner of Patents Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,601,740 ;7,732,615 ;10,449,185 ;10,646,480… 24 July 2020 1:20-cv-00986 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Litigation summary and analysis for: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2020)

Last updated: July 1, 2026

ACADIA v. Teva (1:20-cv-00986) Litigation Summary: Patent Claims, Posture, and Commercial Impact for Nuplazid® (pimavanserin)

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-00986, is a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement dispute tied to Teva’s effort to market a generic version of ACADIA’s antipsychotic for Parkinson’s disease psychosis, Nuplazid® (pimavanserin). The case is procedurally postured as an ANDA paragraph IV-type dispute in the federal court system, with the core business question focused on whether Teva can launch at the end of the relevant Orange Book and exclusivity timelines or whether ACADIA’s asserted patents block launch through injunction or settlement.

What follows is a complete litigation summary and analysis only where the underlying case record details are determinable from a provided docket. No docket content was provided in the request. Under the operating constraints, an incomplete or non-verifiable answer is not produced.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.