CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DIATRIZOATE-60
✉ Email this page to a colleague
All Clinical Trials for DIATRIZOATE-60
Trial ID | Title | Status | Sponsor | Phase | Start Date | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT00953199 ↗ | Topical Pancreatic Duct Lidocaine for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis | Completed | Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | N/A | 2010-03-01 | The purpose of this study is to determine if lidocaine is effective in reducing the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. |
NCT00953199 ↗ | Topical Pancreatic Duct Lidocaine for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis | Completed | Abraham Mathew MD | N/A | 2010-03-01 | The purpose of this study is to determine if lidocaine is effective in reducing the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. |
NCT02542046 ↗ | Uniformity of Oral Contrast Material in the Bowel | Completed | General Electric | 2015-09-01 | Although positive oral contrast agents are used for the majority of abdominopelvic CT scans in the United States, the quality of bowel opacification has not been compared between the three major classes of positive oral contrast material (barium sulfate, ionic iodinated contrast material, and non-ionic iodinate contrast material). This is a retrospective single institution study of clinical records to show whether the uniformity of bowel opacification is different between the three main types of positive CT oral contrast material used in the United States (Barium sulfate, Diatrizoate, and Iohexol). The investigators will retrospectively identify 250 patients each who received oral barium sulfate, diatrizoate, and iohexol for CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis (total 750 patients) and assess the quality of bowel lumen opacification by the positive oral contrast agents. | |
NCT02542046 ↗ | Uniformity of Oral Contrast Material in the Bowel | Completed | University of California, San Francisco | 2015-09-01 | Although positive oral contrast agents are used for the majority of abdominopelvic CT scans in the United States, the quality of bowel opacification has not been compared between the three major classes of positive oral contrast material (barium sulfate, ionic iodinated contrast material, and non-ionic iodinate contrast material). This is a retrospective single institution study of clinical records to show whether the uniformity of bowel opacification is different between the three main types of positive CT oral contrast material used in the United States (Barium sulfate, Diatrizoate, and Iohexol). The investigators will retrospectively identify 250 patients each who received oral barium sulfate, diatrizoate, and iohexol for CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis (total 750 patients) and assess the quality of bowel lumen opacification by the positive oral contrast agents. | |
>Trial ID | >Title | >Status | >Sponsor | >Phase | >Start Date | >Summary |
Clinical Trial Conditions for DIATRIZOATE-60
Condition Name
Clinical Trial Locations for DIATRIZOATE-60
Trials by Country
Clinical Trial Progress for DIATRIZOATE-60
Clinical Trial Phase
Clinical Trial Sponsors for DIATRIZOATE-60
Sponsor Name