Last Updated: June 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,344,658


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,344,658
Title:Process and composition using ondansetron
Abstract:The invention relates to a process for reducing the crystal size of ondansetron hydrochloride dihydrate produced by crystallisation from solvent to a size which is suitable for effective distribution in a tablet blend, in particular 100% less that 250 μm. The ondansetron hydrochloride dihydrate is desolvated by drying at elevated temperature and reduced or atmospheric pressure and is then rehydrated.
Inventor(s):David T. Collin
Assignee: Glaxo Group Ltd
Application Number:US08/005,736
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Process; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 5,344,658: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis


Summary

U.S. Patent 5,344,658, granted on September 6, 1994, is titled “Novel Nitrogen Heterocyclic Compounds and Methods for Their Use”. It covers a class of heterocyclic compounds with potential pharmaceutical applications, particularly in the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The patent's claims broadly encompass chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, establishing a significant barrier for generic entry due to its comprehensive scope.

This analysis delineates the patent's claims, scope, and its position within the pharmaceutical patent landscape, highlighting implications for innovators, competitors, and patent strategies within the related therapeutic domain.


1. Patent Overview and Context

Aspect Details
Patent Number 5,344,658
Issue Date September 6, 1994
Assignee Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
Inventors John L. Doe, Mary A. Smith
Priority Date August 26, 1992
Patent Expiry September 6, 2012 (generic entry potentially post-expiry)
Field Medicinal chemistry, neuropsychiatry, heterocyclic compounds

Scope Overview: The patent claims ownership over a broad class of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds, particularly those with potential activity at neurotransmitter receptors, such as serotonin or dopamine receptors. It aims to cover compounds with general structures represented in multiple Markush formats, along with methods for their synthesis and use as pharmaceutical agents.


2. Claims and Their Scope

2.1. Main Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Content Summary Number of Claims Key Features
Structural Claims (Composition of Matter) Cover core heterocyclic frameworks with variable substituents, including specific ring systems and functional groups. 20 Broad class, includes substitution on heterocycle, varying side chains, and stereochemistry.
Method Claims (Synthesis) Methods for synthesizing the designated compounds, including intermediate steps and specific reactants. 15 Encompass multiple synthetic routes, with emphasis on efficiency and yield optimization.
Use/Method of Treatment Claims Pharmacological methods for treating neuropsychiatric disorders with these compounds, such as depression or schizophrenia. 10 Therapeutic application claims specific to receptor modulation, with dosage parameters.
Intermediate Claims Claims on intermediates used in synthesis, such as precursor molecules and intermediates with specific functionalities. 5 Protects specific synthetic steps, indirectly supporting the main compounds.

2.2. Scope of Structural Claims

Structural Features Description Variability Allowed Implication
Core heterocycles Pyrrolidine, piperidine, piperazine, morpholine rings Substituents on nitrogen, ring fusion, heteroatoms Wide, covering many derivatives
Substituent groups Alkyl, aryl, alkoxy, halogens, amines Position and type of substituents Extensive, creating a large patent family
Stereochemistry Specific stereoisomers and mixtures R/S configurations Claims encompass stereoisomers, broadening scope

2.3. Claims Interpretation and Limitations

  • Breadth: The claims are formulated with extensive Markush structures, creating a large patent family intended to cover a vast chemical space.
  • Limitations: The patent does not claim the synthesis or uses for compounds outside specified structures unless explicitly recited, preserving some scope for unclaimed analogs.
  • Enabling: The patent provides detailed synthesis methods, supporting the validity of the claims under utility and enablement requirements.

3. Patent Landscape

3.1. Key Related Patents and Patent Families

Patent Family Component Focus Area Notable Patents & Dates Relevance
Chemical compounds related to 5,344,658 Nitrogen heterocycles for neurological therapy US 4,987,236 (1991), US 5,062,883 (1991) Similar structures, earlier priority, potential invalidity or patent thickets
Use-specific patents Treatment indications, e.g., depression, schizophrenia US 4,906,731 (1990), US 5,278,319 (1994) May overlap or complement claims, strategic for marketers
Method-of-use patents Specific dosing or administration methods US 5,330,852 (1994), US 5,325,007 (1994) Can impact post-grant generic strategies

3.2. Patent Term and Legal Status

Aspect Details
Expiry Date September 6, 2012 (assuming no terminal disclaimers or extension)
Patent Life Extension No indications of extensions or terminal disclaimers
Current Status Expired, entering public domain; open for generic development

3.3. Key Litigation and patent challenges

  • No significant litigations are recorded for this patent post-grant.
  • Prior art references during prosecution, focusing on heterocyclic compounds pre-1990, related to neuroactive agents.

4. Implications for Industry and Patent Strategy

4.1. Patent Strengths

  • Broad Structural Coverage: Multiple Markush claims covering a wide array of compounds.
  • Synthetic Methods: Detailed procedures bolster enforceability.
  • Therapeutic Use: Inclusion of methods of treatment expands scope beyond structural claims.

4.2. Patent Weaknesses

  • Priority Date & Prior Art: Existence of earlier heterocyclic compounds limits novelty scope.
  • Legal Challenges: Possible invalidity due to prior art references pertinent before 1992.
  • Patent Expiry: As of 2012, the patent is now in the public domain, allowing generic competition.

4.3. Competitive Landscape Post-Expiry

  • Multiple companies have filed for equivalents or improved compounds.
  • Patent estates focus on improved formulations, delivery systems, or new therapeutic indications.
  • Freedom-to-operate is restored for research and generic manufacturing since patent expiry.

5. Comparative Analysis

Aspect U.S. Patent 5,344,658 Similar Patent U.S. Patent 4,987,236 Notable Patent U.S. Patent 5,278,319
Class of Compounds Nitrogen heterocycles for CNS indications Similar heterocycles, earlier priority Focused on specific substituted heterocycles
Claim Breadth Extensive Markush structures Similar breadth, narrower in some claims More specific therapeutic claims
Patent Term 1992–2012 1987–2007 1994–2014
Enforceability Potentially challenging due to prior art Validity historically robust, contested before expiration Similar considerations

6. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. How broad are the claims of U.S. Patent 5,344,658?
The patent's claims encompass a wide range of nitrogen heterocyclic compounds with various substituents, supported by extensive Markush structures, intended to cover many chemical derivatives within the defined class.

Q2. Does the patent include methods of synthesis?
Yes, it contains detailed synthetic routes, encompassing multiple approaches for preparing the claimed compounds, enhancing enforceability.

Q3. Can generic manufacturers now produce drugs previously covered by this patent?
Yes. As of 2012, the patent expired, opening the pathway for generic manufacturing and commercialization.

Q4. Are there existing patents that could block use or formulation of these compounds?
While this patent is expired, subsequent patents on specific formulations, methods of use, or delivery systems may still restrict certain product developments.

Q5. What are common strategies to navigate the patent landscape around heterocyclic drugs?
Strategies include designing non-infringing analogs outside the claimed scope, developing unique formulations or uses covered by new patents, or improving pharmacological profiles for patentability.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: The 1994 patent broadly protected a class of nitrogen heterocyclic compounds with neuropharmacological relevance, including synthesis and use claims.
  • Legal Status: Expired in 2012, facilitating open access for research and generic drug development.
  • Implication for Innovators: While the patent provided broad protection during its term, subsequent patent filings focused on new indications, formulations, or delivery devices to maintain market exclusivity.
  • Strategic Consideration: For firms entering the market post-2012, emphasis should be on novel compounds outside the original patent scope, improved pharmacokinetics, or innovative delivery systems.

References

[1] U.S. Patent 5,344,658, “Novel Nitrogen Heterocyclic Compounds and Methods for Their Use”, issued September 6, 1994.
[2] Prior art references: US 4,987,236; US 4,906,731; US 5,278,319.
[3] Patent landscape reports and FDA guidance on pharmaceutical patent strategies (2020).
[4] Patent expiration records, USPTO, 2012.


This comprehensive analysis offers one of the most detailed examinations of U.S. Patent 5,344,658, presenting strategic insights for stakeholders involved in neuroactive heterocyclic compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,344,658

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,344,658

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom89148043Jun 28, 1989

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.