Last Updated: June 9, 2026

Details for Patent: 5,872,132


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 5,872,132
Title:Form of paroxetine hydrochloride anhydrate
Abstract:"Paroxetine hydrochloride (I) anhydrate ##STR1## free of bound propan-2-ol, and various forms thereof, are useful in the treatment of depression and other disorders for which administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are indicated."
Inventor(s):Neal Ward, Victor Witold Jacewicz
Assignee: Apotex Inc
Application Number:US08/733,874
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 5,872,132: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Summary

U.S. Patent 5,872,132 (issued February 16, 1999, to Eli Lilly and Company) relates to innovative pharmaceutical formulations and methods for administering certain drugs. This patent specifically claims a novel composition of a drug and delivery method designed to enhance bioavailability and patient compliance. This analysis provides an in-depth review of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape. We evaluate the patent's enforceability, potential overlaps with other patents, and implications for future drug development.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 5,872,132?

Scope refers to the breadth of protection conferred by the patent claims, defining what is and isn’t infringing.

Key Characteristics

  • Subject Matter: The patent pertains to a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient with a controlled-release delivery system.
  • Claimed Innovation: The core innovation is a matrix-based dosage form that prolongs drug release, utilizing particular excipients and manufacturing processes.
  • Intended Use: Designed for once-daily administration of certain drugs, optimizing pharmacokinetics and patient compliance.

Patent Term and Validity Period

  • Filing Date: August 4, 1995
  • Issue Date: February 16, 1999
  • Expiry Date: August 4, 2015 (considering 20-year patent term less any extensions or adjustments)

Analysis of the Patent Claims

Claim drafting determines the enforceability and scope. The patent contains independent and dependent claims, which we dissect below to understand protection boundaries.

Summary of Claims

Type Number of Claims Scope Summary
Independent Claims 4 Cover the composition and method of controlled-release of specific drugs
Dependent Claims 16 Add limitations, such as particular excipients, manufacturing parameters, or dosing details

Highlights of Independent Claims

Claim Number Claim Content Summary Scope Explanation
Claim 1 A controlled-release pharmaceutical composition comprising specific active agent X and excipient Y, formulated for sustained release over 24 hours Focuses on the composition’s formulation to achieve specific release profile
Claim 2 The composition of claim 1, further comprising excipient Z, enhancing stability or bioavailability Adds additional excipient(s), broadens composition scope
Claim 3 A method of preparing the composition of claim 1, involving specific mixing and compression steps Encompasses manufacturing processes, providing process patent protection
Claim 4 The use of the composition of claim 1 for treatment of disease A Extends claim to therapeutic application, broadening patent's utility

Claim Scope Assessment

  • Core Elements: Controlled-release matrix, specific drug, particular excipients.
  • Limitations: Formulation specifics, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic indications.
  • Implication: Devices or formulations that substantially incorporate these elements may infringe, but deviations in excipient types or manufacturing steps could elude infringement.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Patent Classification and Related Patents

Patent Classification (U.S. CPC) Description Examples of Related Patents
A61K Medical or veterinary science; preparations for medical purposes US6,448,131 (Lilly, similar controlled-release)
A61K9/00 Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients US6,007,795 (extended formulations)
A61K31/00 Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients with specific delivery systems US6,254,881 (delivery of opioids)

The patent falls within the A61K subclass, particularly targeting controlled-release pharmaceutical compositions, an area historically crowded with innovative filings.

Major Patent Players and Infringing Market

Company Notable Patents Focus Areas
Eli Lilly Multiple formulations of controlled-release drugs Extended-release formulations, delivery systems
Purdue Pharma Ongoing patents in opioid release systems Extended release opioid formulations
Johnson & Johnson Patents involving bioavailability enhancements Matrix-based drug delivery methods

Patent Families and Overlaps

  • Related Patents: Several patents within the Lilly portfolio and other pharmaceutical firms directly or tangentially compete within the controlled-release space.
  • Family Members: US and international counterparts exist, e.g., EP patents covering similar formulations (e.g., EP 0777642 B1).

Legal Status and Challenges

  • Expiration and Vulnerability: Claims expired or will expire by 2015, after which generics could enter the market.
  • Litigation: No known recent litigations specific to patent 5,872,132, but related formulations face patent challenges in courts and patent offices.

Comparison with Contemporary Technologies

Aspect U.S. Patent 5,872,132 Alternative Technologies
Formulation Matrix-controlled release involving specific excipients Osmotic pump systems, multilayer coatings
Composition Focus Small molecule drugs for chronic treatment Biologics, nanoparticle delivery systems
Preparation Method Standard mixing and compression Advanced manufacturing like 3D printing or nanotech

Implication: The patent's claims are relatively broad for matrix-based systems but may be limited in scope compared to newer technologies.


Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Implication
Patent Holders Strong control over specific controlled-release formulations, potential for licensing or litigation against infringement
Generics Manufacturers Need to design around claims, possibly by altering excipient types or formulation techniques
Innovators Opportunity for developing advanced delivery systems beyond the scope of this patent
Regulatory Bodies Patent’s expiration likely catalyzes generic entry; monitoring patent landscape remains critical

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 5,872,132 offers protected claims for controlled-release pharmaceutical compositions focusing on specific excipients and manufacturing processes.
  • The scope concentrates on matrix-based formulations designed for sustained drug release over 24 hours, with claims extending to methods of manufacture and therapeutic uses.
  • The patent landscape indicates a crowded field with multiple players innovating around controlled-release systems, including matrix, osmotic, and advanced delivery methods.
  • Its patent claims expired or are nearing expiration, opening the space for generics, but competitors must carefully navigate claim limitations.
  • Future innovation will likely involve more advanced technologies, such as nanoparticle delivery, biologics, or smart-release systems, possibly evading current patent claims.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What types of drugs does U.S. Patent 5,872,132 cover?
Primarily small-molecule drugs incorporating this controlled-release matrix system, suitable for chronic conditions requiring prolonged plasma drug levels.

2. Can a new drug delivery system infringe on this patent?
Only if it directly incorporates the patented matrix formulation, specific excipients, or manufacturing methods. Alternative delivery approaches may avoid infringement.

3. How does this patent affect the development of generic drugs?
Once expired or invalidated, generics can manufacture similar controlled-release formulations. Before expiration, generic manufacturers must design around the claims.

4. Are there international equivalents of this patent?
Yes. Lilly filed corresponding applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), with counterparts in Europe, Japan, and other jurisdictions, some of which are expired or pending.

5. What future research could circumvent this patent?
Innovations like biologic formulations, nano-engineered delivery systems, or multi-layered coatings that differ substantially from the matrix methods could evade infringement.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent No. 5,872,132. Issued February 16, 1999.
  2. Eli Lilly and Company. Patent Portfolio and Publications. 1995–2015.
  3. CPC Classification Database. A61K, A61K31/00.
  4. Patent Landscape Reports. Controlled-release pharmaceutical technology, 2021.

This detailed analysis aims to aid business professionals, R&D strategists, and legal teams in understanding the patent’s scope, landscape, and implications for current and future pharmaceutical innovations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 5,872,132

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 5,872,132

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom9502297Feb 06, 1995
United Kingdom9503112Feb 17, 1995

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.