2016-11-10 |
101 |
Exhibit A |
’428 Patent PH U.S. Patent No. 6,759,398 (see, e.g., Col.
…00001339. U.S. Patent No. 6,759,398 (see, e.g., Col.
… The ’620, 723, and ’428 patents arise from the same patent family and share substantially similar… ’723, and ’428 patents contain many of the same references. For citations to patents, the parties
incorporate… MEDA_TEVA_00000733 (Non-Patent U.S. Patent No. 5,889,015 (see, e.g., Col.
|
External link to document |
2016-11-13 |
104 |
|
("CoC") for U.S. Patent No. 9,259,428 ('" 428 patent") into this case.
(D.I…inadvertent
typographical errors" in the '428 patent. (D.I. 62 at 1) "On May 3, 2016, the PTO issued…requested Certificate of Correction for the '428 patent." (Id.) Plaintiffs explain that
thereafter…indefiniteness arguments regarding claim 28 of '_428 patent, arguments that would be affected by
introduction…litigating the
uncorrected version of the '428 patent. (See D.I. 65 at 5) (discussing litigation that |
External link to document |
2016-12-06 |
113 |
|
of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,163,723; 8,168,620; and 9,259,428.
With respect to the '428 patent, the PTO… claims 28-30 of the '428 patent, which, in the uncorrected patent, contain a
typographical error…addressing construction of claims 28-30 of the '428 patent, within one week of the date of this order. Signed…additional
exhibits are documents from the '428 patent's prosecution history, including a listing…in the,context of claims 28-30 of
the '428 patent.
3. D~fendant opposes Plaintiffs |
External link to document |
2017-08-29 |
123 |
|
the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,163,723; 8,168,620. (etg) (…2015
28 July 2017
1:15-cv-00785
830 Patent
None
District Court, D. Delaware
|
External link to document |