VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED) Drug Patent Profile

When do Viekira Pak (copackaged) patents expire, and when can generic versions of Viekira Pak (copackaged) launch?

Viekira Pak (copackaged) is a drug marketed by Abbvie and is included in one NDA. There are fifteen patents protecting this drug.

This drug has five hundred and sixty-five patent family members in fifty-two countries.

The generic ingredient in VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED) is dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir. Additional details are available on the dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir profile page.

DrugPatentWatch^® Generic Entry Outlook for Viekira Pak (copackaged)

Viekira Pak (copackaged) was eligible for patent challenges on December 19, 2018.

By analyzing the patents and regulatory protections it appears that the earliest date for generic entry will be April 13, 2032. This may change due to patent challenges or generic licensing.

There have been seventeen patent litigation cases involving the patents protecting this drug, indicating strong interest in generic launch. Recent data indicate that 63% of patent challenges are decided in favor of the generic patent challenger and that 54% of successful patent challengers promptly launch generic drugs.

Indicators of Generic Entry

Summary for VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)

International Patents:	565
US Patents:	15
Applicants:	1
NDAs:	1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors:	1
Patent Applications:	72
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases:	See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)
DailyMed Link:	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED) at DailyMed

DrugPatentWatch^® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)

NDA:

206619

Dosage:

TABLET, TABLET;ORAL

^*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

US Patents and Regulatory Information for VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)

VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED) is protected by fifteen US patents.

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

Applicant	Tradename	Generic Name	Dosage	NDA	Approval Date	TE	Type	RLD	RS	Patent No.	Patent Expiration	Product	Substance	Delist Req.	Exclusivity Expiration
Abbvie	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)	dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir	TABLET;ORAL	206619-001	Dec 19, 2014		DISCN	Yes	No
Abbvie	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)	dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir	TABLET;ORAL	206619-001	Dec 19, 2014		DISCN	Yes	No
Abbvie	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)	dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir	TABLET;ORAL	206619-001	Dec 19, 2014		DISCN	Yes	No			Y
Abbvie	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)	dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir	TABLET;ORAL	206619-001	Dec 19, 2014		DISCN	Yes	No			Y

Expired US Patents for VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)

Applicant	Tradename	Generic Name	Dosage	NDA	Approval Date	Patent No.	Patent Expiration
Abbvie	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)	dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir	TABLET;ORAL	206619-001	Dec 19, 2014
Abbvie	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)	dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir	TABLET;ORAL	206619-001	Dec 19, 2014
Abbvie	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)	dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir	TABLET;ORAL	206619-001	Dec 19, 2014
Abbvie	VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)	dasabuvir sodium; ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir	TABLET;ORAL	206619-001	Dec 19, 2014

International Patents for VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)

When does loss-of-exclusivity occur for VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)?

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the following patents block generic entry in the countries listed below:

Argentina

Australia

Brazil

Canada

Chile

China

Colombia

Costa Rica

Croatia

Cyprus

Denmark

Dominican Republic

Ecuador

Eurasian Patent Organization

European Patent Office

France

Guatemala

Hong Kong

Hungary

Israel

Japan

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Malaysia

Mexico

Montenegro

Netherlands

New Zealand

Norway

Peru

Philippines

Poland

Portugal

San Marino

Serbia

Singapore

Slovenia

South Africa

South Korea

Spain

Taiwan

Turkey

Ukraine

Uruguay

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

See the table below for additional patents covering VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED) around the world.

Country	Patent Number	Title	Estimated Expiration
Poland	2368882
Denmark	2468286
European Patent Office	2130534
Lithuania	2805726

Supplementary Protection Certificates for VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED)

Patent Number	Supplementary Protection Certificate	SPC Country	SPC Expiration	SPC Description
2692346	1790050-7	Sweden		PRODUCT NAME: PIBRENTASVIR OR A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/17/1213 20170728
2368890	300731	Netherlands		DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), ASSIGNMENT
2692346	122017000074	Germany		PRODUCT NAME: PIBRENTASVIR ODER EIN PHARMAZEUTISCH VERTRAEGLICHES SALZ DAVON; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/17/1213 20170726
2203431	CA 2015 00014	Denmark		PRODUCT NAME: DASABUVIR OR A SALT THEREOF, INCLUDING DASABUVIR SODIUM MONOHYDRATE; REG. NO/DATE: EU/1/14/983 20150115

VIEKIRA PAK (COPACKAGED) Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 19, 2026

What is VIEKIRA PAK's Place in the Hepatitis C Market?

VIEKIRA PAK (ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, and dasabuvir) is a regimen for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. It was developed by AbbVie and received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in December 2014. VIEKIRA PAK represents a significant entry into the then-emerging market of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies for HCV, a class of drugs that revolutionized treatment by offering higher cure rates and shorter treatment durations compared to older interferon-based regimens.

The drug is indicated for adult patients with genotype 1 (GT1) chronic HCV infection, specifically including those with cirrhosis. VIEKIRA PAK's development and market entry coincided with a period of intense competition and rapid innovation in the HCV therapeutic landscape. Other major players, including Gilead Sciences with its Harvoni and Sovaldi, and Merck & Co. with its Zepatier, also launched or were developing similar DAA regimens. This competitive environment significantly influenced pricing strategies, market access, and the overall financial trajectory of drugs like VIEKIRA PAK.

The introduction of VIEKIRA PAK was positioned as a pan-genotypic, interferon-free option for a specific genotype. Its packaging and dosing regimen were designed for ease of use, aiming to improve patient adherence. The regimen's efficacy was demonstrated in clinical trials, showing high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, the primary endpoint for HCV cure.

Key characteristics of VIEKIRA PAK:

• Active Ingredients: Ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, dasabuvir
• Indication: Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in adults.
• Development: AbbVie Inc.
• FDA Approval Date: December 2014
• Mechanism of Action: Targets multiple stages of the HCV replication cycle, including NS3/4A protease, NS5A protein, and NS5B polymerase.

The initial market reception for VIEKIRA PAK was shaped by its novel mechanism of action and the significant unmet need for effective, tolerable HCV treatments. However, the competitive intensity and rapid obsolescence of earlier DAA generations presented considerable challenges.

What Has Been VIEKIRA PAK's Financial Performance?

AbbVie's financial reporting provides insight into VIEKIRA PAK's commercial performance. Following its launch, the drug initially contributed to AbbVie's revenue growth in the HCV segment. However, the highly competitive nature of the HCV market, coupled with the development of newer, broader-spectrum DAAs and the eventual decline in the overall patient pool seeking treatment for chronic HCV, led to a significant decrease in VIEKIRA PAK's sales over time.

AbbVie reported substantial sales for its HCV products in the initial years post-launch. For instance, in 2015, AbbVie's HCV product sales reached $3.2 billion, with VIEKIRA PAK being a primary contributor. By 2016, these sales further increased to $4.7 billion. However, the market dynamics shifted rapidly. Competition from Gilead's Harvoni, which offered a pan-genotypic solution with high cure rates for multiple genotypes, exerted significant pressure.

HCV Product Sales for AbbVie (in billions USD):

Year	Total HCV Sales
2015	3.2
2016	4.7
2017	2.7
2018	1.4
2019	0.7
2020	0.2

Source: AbbVie Inc. Annual Reports [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

The decline from 2016 onwards reflects several factors:

• Increased Competition: The market became saturated with highly effective DAA regimens that often covered a wider range of HCV genotypes.
• Market Saturation: A substantial portion of the prevalent HCV patient population requiring treatment was addressed by earlier DAA launches.
• Pricing Pressures: Intense competition led to significant price negotiations with payers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), impacting gross revenue and net sales.
• Pipeline Evolution: AbbVie itself introduced newer HCV therapies like Mavyret (glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) in 2017, which offered broader genotype coverage and a shorter treatment duration, effectively cannibalizing sales of VIEKIRA PAK. Mavyret became AbbVie's flagship HCV product.

By 2020, AbbVie's HCV franchise sales had significantly diminished, with VIEKIRA PAK and its related products no longer representing a substantial revenue stream for the company. The drug's financial trajectory demonstrates a common pattern in the pharmaceutical industry where innovation, competition, and market evolution can lead to rapid ascents followed by sharp declines in sales for specific therapeutic agents.

What are the Key Patent Expirations and Market Exclusivity Considerations?

The patent landscape and market exclusivity periods for VIEKIRA PAK are critical for understanding its long-term commercial viability and the potential for generic competition. AbbVie's intellectual property portfolio for VIEKIRA PAK encompassed patents covering the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), formulations, methods of use, and manufacturing processes.

Key Patents and Exclusivity:

• Composition of Matter Patents: These patents typically provide the longest period of exclusivity and cover the chemical structure of the active ingredients. For VIEKIRA PAK's components (ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, dasabuvir), these patents would have been filed around the time of discovery and development. Given the 2014 approval date, the primary composition of matter patents would likely have an initial term extending approximately 20 years from the filing date, potentially with patent term extensions (PTEs) granted by regulatory authorities to compensate for regulatory review delays.
• Method of Use Patents: These patents cover specific therapeutic applications of the drug, such as its use in treating GT1 HCV infection with or without cirrhosis.
• Formulation Patents: These patents protect the specific dosage forms and delivery systems used in VIEKIRA PAK.
• Data Exclusivity: In addition to patent protection, regulatory agencies grant periods of data exclusivity upon drug approval. In the United States, New Chemical Entity (NCE) exclusivity typically lasts for 5 years. For VIEKIRA PAK, as a new combination product, the exact nature and duration of exclusivity granted would depend on the specific regulatory pathways pursued. In Europe, a similar framework exists with market protection periods.

Generic Competition Outlook:

The expiration of key composition of matter patents is the primary trigger for generic competition. While specific patent expiry dates can be complex due to multiple patents, patent challenges, and PTEs, the core patents protecting the APIs in VIEKIRA PAK would have begun to expire in the late 2020s and early 2030s.

• Early Market Entry for Generics: Once the foundational patents expire and any granted PTEs lapse, generic manufacturers can file Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) with the FDA. The first generic to file a successful ANDA may be eligible for 180 days of market exclusivity.
• Impact of Mavyret: AbbVie's own introduction of Mavyret, which offers broader coverage and a shorter treatment regimen, significantly predated the full expiration of VIEKIRA PAK's core patents. Mavyret itself is now facing or will soon face generic competition as its patent protection also nears expiration.
• Declining Market Size: The overall market for HCV treatments has contracted due to the high cure rates achieved with DAAs and the shrinking pool of untreated patients. This smaller market size means that the financial impact of generic entry on a drug like VIEKIRA PAK may be less dramatic than for blockbuster drugs in larger, growing therapeutic areas.

Summary of Exclusivity Considerations:

• Patent Term Extension (PTE): Likely applied to extend patent life beyond the standard 20 years from filing, compensating for FDA review time.
• Orphan Drug Exclusivity: Not applicable to VIEKIRA PAK, as it was not designated as an orphan drug.
• New Chemical Entity (NCE) Exclusivity: Potentially granted for novel components, contributing to market protection.
• Generic Entry Timing: Dependent on the expiration of core composition of matter patents and PTEs, anticipated in the late 2020s to early 2030s. The commercial impact will be mitigated by the drug's declining market share and the overall market contraction.

The strategic introduction of Mavyret by AbbVie was a proactive measure to maintain market leadership in HCV, effectively managing the lifecycle of its HCV franchise in anticipation of VIEKIRA PAK's eventual patent expiry and the broader market shifts.

What is the Competitive Landscape and its Impact on VIEKIRA PAK?

The hepatitis C market at the time of VIEKIRA PAK's launch was characterized by rapid scientific advancement and intense competition from multiple pharmaceutical companies. This dynamic environment profoundly impacted VIEKIRA PAK's market penetration, pricing power, and long-term financial outlook.

Key Competitors and Regimens:

1. Gilead Sciences:

   • Sovaldi (sofosbuvir): Approved in December 2013, Sovaldi was a foundational DAA, often used in combination with other agents.
   • Harvoni (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir): Approved in October 2014, Harvoni was a pan-genotypic, all-oral, single-tablet regimen for GT1 HCV, directly competing with VIEKIRA PAK. Its broad applicability and convenience made it a formidable competitor.
   • Epclusa (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir): Approved in June 2016, Epclusa offered pan-genotypic coverage for all six major HCV genotypes, further intensifying competition and offering a more comprehensive solution.

2. Merck & Co.:

   • Zepatier (elbasvir/grazoprevir): Approved in January 2016, Zepatier offered a combination regimen for GT1 and GT4 HCV, providing another alternative to VIEKIRA PAK and Harvoni.

3. AbbVie's Mavyret (glecaprevir/pibrentasvir):

   • Approved in August 2017, Mavyret was AbbVie's next-generation HCV treatment. It provided pan-genotypic coverage and a shorter treatment duration (8 weeks for most patients), positioning it as a superior option to VIEKIRA PAK and other earlier regimens. Mavyret effectively superseded VIEKIRA PAK within AbbVie's own portfolio.

Impact of Competition:

• Pricing Wars and Rebates: The sheer number of highly effective DAA regimens led to aggressive price negotiations with payers and PBMs. This resulted in significant price reductions through rebates and discounts, impacting the net sales of all HCV drugs, including VIEKIRA PAK. While list prices were high, actual realized prices were considerably lower.
• Market Share Erosion: Gilead's Harvoni, with its pan-genotypic coverage, quickly captured significant market share. VIEKIRA PAK, being primarily indicated for GT1, faced a more limited patient pool compared to pan-genotypic options.
• Accelerated Obsolescence: The rapid pace of innovation meant that newer, more effective, or more convenient regimens could quickly make older ones less attractive, even if they were still clinically effective. Mavyret's approval accelerated this process for VIEKIRA PAK.
• Shifting Treatment Paradigms: The widespread success of DAAs led to a rapid decline in the prevalence of treated HCV patients. The market shifted from rapid growth to a more mature and contracting phase, further reducing the commercial opportunity for single-genotype or older DAA regimens.
• R&D Prioritization: Pharmaceutical companies increasingly focused their R&D efforts on next-generation treatments or other therapeutic areas as the HCV market matured and became highly competitive, impacting the long-term investment in VIEKIRA PAK.

The competitive landscape therefore dictated that VIEKIRA PAK's commercial success was constrained from its inception. Its ability to capture and retain market share was constantly challenged by superior or broader-acting competitor products, ultimately limiting its financial trajectory and leading to its eventual obsolescence within AbbVie's HCV portfolio.

What are the Regulatory and Reimbursement Challenges?

Navigating the regulatory approval process and securing favorable reimbursement for VIEKIRA PAK were critical steps in its market introduction and commercialization. These processes presented significant hurdles, common to high-cost, innovative therapies, and were compounded by the unique dynamics of the HCV market.

Regulatory Pathway:

• FDA Review: VIEKIRA PAK underwent a standard review process by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Its approval in December 2014 was based on data from Phase III clinical trials (e.g., the SAPPHIRE-I and SAPPHIRE-II studies) demonstrating high SVR rates in patients with GT1 HCV.
• Labeling Restrictions: The initial indication was for GT1 HCV. While effective, this specificity limited its addressable patient population compared to pan-genotypic regimens approved later.
• Combination Approval: As a fixed-dose combination, the review process also assessed the safety and efficacy of the co-formulated components and their interactions.

Reimbursement Landscape:

• High Cost of DAAs: Direct-acting antivirals, including VIEKIRA PAK, were introduced at high price points. This triggered significant concerns from payers (insurance companies, PBMs, government programs like Medicare and Medicaid) regarding the affordability and cost-effectiveness of these therapies.
• Payer Restrictions: To manage costs, payers implemented various access restrictions:
  • Prior Authorization: Requiring physicians to obtain approval before prescribing the drug, often necessitating proof of disease severity, prior treatment failure, or specific genotype.
  • Step Therapy: Mandating that patients try less expensive or older treatments first before approving a newer, more expensive DAA like VIEKIRA PAK.
  • Formulary Exclusions: Excluding certain drugs from preferred placement on formularies, making them less accessible or more expensive for patients.
  • Quantity Limits: Restricting the amount of medication a patient could receive within a given timeframe.
• PBM Negotiations: Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) played a crucial role in negotiating rebates and discounts with manufacturers. These negotiations significantly influenced the net price of VIEKIRA PAK and were a key determinant of its formulary placement and patient access.
• Value-Based Agreements: In some instances, payers explored value-based agreements where payment was tied to treatment outcomes (e.g., achieving SVR). While not universally adopted, these models aimed to align payer and manufacturer interests.
• Competition's Role in Reimbursement: The availability of multiple highly effective DAAs from competitors like Gilead created leverage for payers. They could demand steeper discounts and more favorable terms to include a drug like VIEKIRA PAK on their formularies, especially when pan-genotypic options offered broader coverage.
• AbbVie's Strategy with Mavyret: AbbVie's subsequent launch of Mavyret, with its pan-genotypic coverage and shorter treatment duration, was also informed by reimbursement challenges. Mavyret was designed to be a more competitive offering from a cost-effectiveness and access perspective, particularly given its shorter treatment course.

The reimbursement environment for VIEKIRA PAK was therefore characterized by a constant tension between the clinical need for curative HCV therapies and the economic pressures on healthcare systems. Successfully navigating these challenges required extensive health economics and outcomes research, robust market access teams, and a willingness to engage in complex negotiations with payers and PBMs. The success of VIEKIRA PAK, like other DAAs, was as much a function of payer acceptance and formulary access as it was of its clinical efficacy.

What is the Future Outlook for VIEKIRA PAK?

The future outlook for VIEKIRA PAK is one of continued decline and eventual market withdrawal, driven by the natural evolution of the pharmaceutical market, competitive pressures, and the success of next-generation therapies.

Key Factors Influencing Future Trajectory:

• Continued Market Contraction: The global market for hepatitis C treatments is contracting. The initial wave of treatment needs has largely been met. The remaining patient pool is smaller, often more complex to treat (e.g., individuals with treatment-experienced cases, liver disease, or co-infections), or faces access barriers.
• Dominance of Next-Generation DAAs: AbbVie's own Mavyret, along with other pan-genotypic regimens, has largely replaced VIEKIRA PAK in clinical practice due to its broader genotype coverage, shorter treatment duration, and demonstrated real-world effectiveness. Mavyret's 8-week curative regimen for most patients has become the standard of care.
• Generic Competition Anticipation: As mentioned previously, the expiration of key patents protecting VIEKIRA PAK's active ingredients will pave the way for generic versions. While the market size will likely be small by the time generics enter, it will further erode any remaining revenue.
• AbbVie's Portfolio Prioritization: AbbVie will continue to prioritize marketing and sales efforts on its more advanced and commercially successful HCV products, primarily Mavyret. Investment in VIEKIRA PAK will be minimal.
• Limited New Indications or Development: It is highly unlikely that VIEKIRA PAK will see significant new indications or further clinical development. Its therapeutic niche has been fully occupied by superior alternatives.
• Potential for Obsolescence and Discontinuation: As sales dwindle and it becomes commercially unviable to maintain the product, AbbVie may eventually choose to discontinue VIEKIRA PAK. This decision would be based on sales volume, manufacturing costs, and strategic portfolio management.

Projected Sales Trajectory:

AbbVie's financial reports have already shown a dramatic decrease in HCV product sales attributed to VIEKIRA PAK and its associated components. This trend is expected to continue with sales reaching negligible levels in the coming years.

• Near-term (1-2 years): Sales will likely remain low, primarily serving residual demand or specific patient populations not covered by newer regimens.
• Mid-term (3-5 years): Generic entry could commence, further diminishing sales. AbbVie may begin phasing out support for the product.
• Long-term (5+ years): VIEKIRA PAK is expected to be effectively obsolete, with very limited or no commercial presence.

The trajectory of VIEKIRA PAK serves as a case study for the rapid lifecycle of innovative drugs in highly competitive therapeutic areas. Despite its initial success as a groundbreaking DAA, its market position was transient, superseded by subsequent innovations.

Key Takeaways

• VIEKIRA PAK, an early direct-acting antiviral regimen for genotype 1 hepatitis C, achieved significant initial sales for AbbVie but experienced a rapid decline due to intense competition and market evolution.
• AbbVie's HCV franchise sales peaked in 2016 and have since significantly contracted, with VIEKIRA PAK being largely superseded by AbbVie's own pan-genotypic Mavyret.
• Key patents protecting VIEKIRA PAK's active ingredients are expected to expire in the late 2020s to early 2030s, opening the door for generic competition, though the market size will be considerably smaller.
• The competitive landscape, dominated by pan-genotypic regimens from Gilead Sciences and subsequently AbbVie's own Mavyret, eroded VIEKIRA PAK's market share and contributed to pricing pressures.
• Regulatory approval was followed by significant reimbursement challenges, including payer restrictions and intense price negotiations, which impacted net sales and market access.
• The future outlook for VIEKIRA PAK is one of continued decline and eventual obsolescence, as market contraction, the dominance of next-generation therapies, and generic entry render it commercially unviable.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. When did VIEKIRA PAK receive U.S. FDA approval?

VIEKIRA PAK received U.S. FDA approval in December 2014.

2. What hepatitis C genotypes is VIEKIRA PAK indicated for?

VIEKIRA PAK is indicated for adult patients with genotype 1 (GT1) chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

3. Did AbbVie develop any successor drugs to VIEKIRA PAK?

Yes, AbbVie developed Mavyret (glecaprevir/pibrentasvir), a pan-genotypic and shorter-duration regimen, which has largely replaced VIEKIRA PAK within AbbVie's portfolio.

4. What is the primary reason for VIEKIRA PAK's declining sales?

The primary reasons for VIEKIRA PAK's declining sales include intense competition from other direct-acting antivirals (especially pan-genotypic ones), the evolution of treatment standards to include newer, more effective regimens, and the natural contraction of the overall hepatitis C treatment market.

5. When can generic versions of VIEKIRA PAK be expected?

Generic versions of VIEKIRA PAK are anticipated to become available following the expiration of key composition of matter patents and any associated patent term extensions, which are generally expected in the late 2020s to early 2030s.

Citations

[1] AbbVie Inc. (2016). AbbVie Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015 Financial Results. [Press Release]. [2] AbbVie Inc. (2017). AbbVie Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Financial Results. [Press Release]. [3] AbbVie Inc. (2018). AbbVie Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2017 Financial Results. [Press Release]. [4] AbbVie Inc. (2019). AbbVie Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Financial Results. [Press Release]. [5] AbbVie Inc. (2020). AbbVie Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2019 Financial Results. [Press Release]. [6] AbbVie Inc. (2021). AbbVie Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Financial Results. [Press Release].