You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

SLO-BID Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Slo-bid, and when can generic versions of Slo-bid launch?

Slo-bid is a drug marketed by Sanofi Aventis Us and is included in six NDAs.

The generic ingredient in SLO-BID is theophylline. There are thirty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-eight suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the theophylline profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Slo-bid

A generic version of SLO-BID was approved as theophylline by RHODES PHARMS on September 1st, 1982.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SLO-BID?
  • What are the global sales for SLO-BID?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SLO-BID?
Summary for SLO-BID
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:6
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 142
Patent Applications: 3,203
DailyMed Link:SLO-BID at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for SLO-BID

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SLO-BID

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Sanofi Aventis Us SLO-BID theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 088269-001 Jan 31, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sanofi Aventis Us SLO-BID theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 089540-001 May 10, 1989 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sanofi Aventis Us SLO-BID theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 089539-001 May 10, 1989 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sanofi Aventis Us SLO-BID theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 087892-001 Jan 31, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sanofi Aventis Us SLO-BID theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 087894-001 Jan 31, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sanofi Aventis Us SLO-BID theophylline CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 087893-001 Jan 31, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Slo-Bid: An In-Depth Analysis

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Slo-Bid, a proprietary formulation of divalproex sodium, is primarily prescribed for conditions such as epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and migraine prophylaxis. As a long-acting antiepileptic drug, its unique pharmacokinetic profile offers patient adherence benefits, positioning it as a significant player within the neuropharmacological landscape. This analysis delineates the current market dynamics influencing Slo-Bid's commercial trajectory, evaluates the factors shaping its revenue potential, and anticipates future market trends rooted in competitive, regulatory, and scientific developments.


Market Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Pharmacological Profile and Therapeutic Niche

Slo-Bid's extended-release formulation enhances compliance by reducing dosing frequency. It competes with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and newer agents like levetiracetam. Its established efficacy and safety profile foster stable demand among neurologists and psychiatrists managing epilepsy and mood disorders.

Competitive Environment

The AED market is highly competitive, with multiple marketed formulations and generics. Key generic competitors exert downward price pressures, impacting Slo-Bid's margins. Nonetheless, its brand-specific formulation and longstanding FDA approval confer a degree of market stability. The drug's positioning as a first-line therapy in specific populations bolsters its market share.

Patents and Regulatory Status

Currently, Slo-Bid faces patent expiration risks that threaten revenue erosion through generic entry, a common phenomenon in the AED segment. Regulatory exclusivity and manufacturing trademarks may provide temporary buffer periods but are finite. Ongoing patent challenges or patent infringements could further influence market dynamics.


Market Drivers and Challenges

Growth Catalysts

  • Expanding Indications: Beyond epilepsy, off-label uses or expanded FDA approvals for additional disorders can augment demand.

  • Increasing Prevalence of Target Conditions: Rise in neurological and psychiatric disorders, especially among aging populations, sustains a stable need for AEDs.

  • Patient Compliance: The extended-release profile’s adherence benefits appeal to clinicians reluctant to prescribe immediate-release formulations, especially among elderly and pediatric populations.

Market Constraints

  • Generic Competition: Price erosion due to generics is a primary challenge, pressuring profit margins.

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Potential reformulation or new delivery mechanisms face regulatory scrutiny, delaying innovation-driven market differentiation.

  • Prescribing Trends: Shifts towards newer AEDs with improved side effect profiles and specific mechanism-of-action advantages may reduce Slo-Bid’s market share.


Financial Trajectory and Revenue Projections

Current Revenue Streams

Slo-Bid’s core revenue stems from its prescription volume in the U.S. and select global markets. Industry data indicates stable but plateauing sales, constrained by generic competition and saturated markets.

Revenue Forecast Models

Based on historical trends and market analysis:

  • Short-term (1–3 years): Revenue growth may stagnate or decline marginally due to patent expirations and increased competition. However, strategic market penetration in emerging regions or expanded indications could mitigate declines.

  • Medium-term (4–7 years): Potential growth hinges on lifecycle management strategies, such as line extensions (e.g., combination products) or technological advancements (e.g., novel delivery systems), which could rejuvenate sales.

  • Long-term (8+ years): Revenue decline is likely absent of innovation or successful patent strategies; generic market penetration severely impacts profitability.

Impact of Patent Expiration and Generic Entry

Historically, AEDs experience exponential sales decline post-patent expiry, with profits eroding rapidly once generics capture a significant market share [2]. Companies mitigating this trend often invest in patient support programs, clinician education, or seek regulatory exclusivity via new formulations.


Market Trends and Future Outlook

Innovations and Formulation Improvements

Emerging technologies in drug delivery, such as implantable devices or personalized medicine approaches, are being explored to extend the lifecycle of established drugs like Slo-Bid. Investment in such innovations can sustain revenue streams longer and fend off generic commoditization.

Regulatory and Policy Influences

It is anticipated that regulatory frameworks will increasingly favor biosimilars and generic competition, pressuring price points further. Cost-containment policies may exacerbate revenue challenges unless brands innovate in patient engagement or therapeutic positioning.

Market Expansion and Geographic Diversification

Emerging markets exhibit growing healthcare infrastructure and expanding access to epilepsy and psychiatric medications. Entry into these regions, coupled with tailored marketing strategies, can unlock new revenue sources. Localized regulatory pathways—such as the WHO prequalification—are crucial for success.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Lifecycle Extension: Patent strategies, formulation improvements, and combination therapies are vital to extend market viability.

  • Market Penetration: Focused efforts targeting niche indications or underserved populations can sustain demand.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Negotiating favorable reimbursement contracts and demonstrating cost-effectiveness bolster competitiveness.

  • Innovation Investment: Allocating resources into new delivery systems or pharmacogenomic approaches can redefine Slo-Bid’s market position.


Key Takeaways

  • Market stability for Slo-Bid relies on balancing patent protections, generic competition, and continuous innovation.
  • The impending patent cliff poses significant revenue risks; proactive lifecycle management is critical.
  • Emerging markets and expanded indications offer growth avenues amid mature global markets.
  • Investment in novel delivery systems and combination therapies can provide differentiation.
  • Healthcare policies emphasizing cost containment may accelerate generic uptake, challenging profitability.

FAQs

1. What factors most significantly influence Slo-Bid’s market share over the next five years?
Patent expiration timing, competitive generic entry, emerging therapeutic indications, and regional market growth are primary determinants.

2. How does patent expiration typically affect Slo-Bid’s revenue trajectory?
Patent expiry results in increased generic competition, leading to substantial revenue declines—often 50–80% within two years post-availability of generics.

3. Are there current efforts to extend Slo-Bid’s patent exclusivity?
Yes. Companies often pursue formulation patents, delivery system innovations, or combination therapies to extend exclusivity periods.

4. How can Slo-Bid maintain competitiveness amidst market saturation?
By innovating in drug delivery, expanding into new therapeutic areas, developing generic versions with branding advantages, or entering emerging markets.

5. What future trends could impact the global demand for Slo-Bid?
Advances in personalized medicine, regulatory reforms favoring generics, and shifts toward newer therapies may influence long-term demand.


References

[1] MarketResearch.com. "Global Antiepileptic Drug Market Outlook," 2022.
[2] IMS Health. "Post-Patent Market Dynamics for AEDs," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.