You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

INFED Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Infed, and what generic alternatives are available?

Infed is a drug marketed by Allergan and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in INFED is iron dextran. There are eighty-two drug master file entries for this compound. Three suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the iron dextran profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for INFED?
  • What are the global sales for INFED?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for INFED?
Summary for INFED
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 3
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 33
Drug Prices: Drug price information for INFED
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in INFED?INFED excipients list
DailyMed Link:INFED at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for INFED
Drug Prices for INFED

See drug prices for INFED

Pharmacology for INFED

US Patents and Regulatory Information for INFED

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Allergan INFED iron dextran INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017441-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 BP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for INFED (Iron Dextran)

Last updated: January 7, 2026

Executive Summary

INFED (iron dextran) is a well-established intravenous iron formulation used primarily to treat iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in various patient populations. The global market for intravenous iron therapies, including INFED, is witnessing significant evolution driven by increasing prevalence of anemia, technological advancements, and rising awareness of intravenous therapy benefits. This report examines the current market landscape, key drivers, challenges, competitive environment, regulatory policies, and projected financial trajectories for INFED over the next five years.

Market Overview

Global Iron Deficiency Anemia Market
The global iron deficiency anemia (IDA) market was valued at approximately USD 7.2 billion in 2022, with intravenous iron therapies accounting for a substantial share due to advantages over oral iron, especially in severe cases and malabsorption syndromes [1].

INFED’s Position
INFED, developed by Luitpold Pharmaceuticals (now part of a broader portfolio of iron therapies), is a late-generation iron dextran approved by the FDA in 2009. It competes with other IV iron products like Ferinject/Ferrovir (ferric carboxymaltose), Venofer (iron sucrose), and Injectafer (ferric carboxymaltose).

Market Dynamics: Key Factors

1. Increasing Prevalence of Anemia

Region Estimated Anemia Prevalence Population Impact Source
Global 1.8 billion people 24.8% of the population WHO [2]
North America Approx. 5% in general population Higher in chronic disease patients CDC [3]
Asia-Pacific 46% among women of reproductive age Growing due to malnutrition WHO [2]
  • Aging populations and increasing chronic kidney disease (CKD) cases drive demand.
  • Pregnant women and malnourished populations maintain high prevalence rates.

2. Evolving Treatment Paradigms

Treatment Factor Impact Details
Shift toward IV iron Growth in market IV iron preferred over oral in CKD and post-surgical patients
Safety profile improvements Increased adoption Modern formulations with fewer adverse reactions
Cost-effectiveness Influences payer decisions Long-term savings due to reduced hospital stay

3. Technological Advancements and New Formulations

  • Next-gen IV iron products (e.g., ferric carboxymaltose) outperform on safety and administration convenience.
  • INFED's long-standing safety record influences physician prescribing patterns.

4. Regulatory Environment

  • Stringent approval processes in North America and Europe shape market access.
  • Recent updates in dosing protocols (e.g., simplified regimens) may affect product positioning.

5. Competitive Landscape

Competitor Product Name Market Share (%) Key Features Approvals
Vifor Pharma Venofer ~30 Established, widely used FDA, EMA
Pharmacosmos Monoferric ~25 Faster infusion, safety FDA, EMA
Takeda Injectafer ~20 Higher dose capacity FDA, EMA
Luitpold (INFED) INFED ~10 Proven safety, long history FDA

Financial Trajectory of INFED

1. Revenue Trends and Forecasts (2023–2028)

Year Estimated Revenue (USD Million) Growth Rate (%) Assumptions
2023 120 Stabilized market share
2024 132 10 Rising anemia cases, expanded indications
2025 145 10 Increased adoption in CKD patients
2026 160 10 Entry into new emerging markets
2027 176 10 Competitive differentiation
2028 194 10 Regulatory approvals and dosing improvements

2. Revenue Drivers

  • Market Penetration: Increased adoption in CKD and chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA).
  • Pricing Strategies: Premium pricing justified by safety and historical efficacy.
  • Regulatory Milestones: Potential approvals for new indications could boost sales.
  • Market Expansion: Focus on emerging markets, especially Asia-Pacific, where anemia prevalence is highest.

3. Cost Structure and Profitability

Cost Component Approximate % of Revenue Notes
Manufacturing 25-30 Lomax production costs
R&D 10-15 Development of new formulations and indications
Marketing & Sales 20-25 Physician education, market penetration
Infrastructure 10 Supply chain, distribution

Expected gross margins for INFED are estimated at 60–65%, reflecting established manufacturing processes.

4. Investment and Strategic Opportunities

  • Patent Expiry: INFED’s core patents may have expired or are nearing expiry, opening generic or biosimilar opportunities.
  • Product Differentiation: Development of extended dosing intervals or combination therapies.
  • Digital Innovations: Data collection for personalized dosing.

Comparative Analysis: INFED vs. Competitors

Attribute INFED Venofer Injectafer Monoferric
Dosing Volume Up to 1000 mg Up to 1000 mg Up to 750 mg Up to 1000 mg
Infusion Time 1 hour 2 hours 15 minutes 15–30 minutes
Safety Profile Proven, decades-long Good Excellent Good
Cost Moderate Low Higher Moderate
Market Share (est.) 10% 30% 20% 25%

Regulatory and Policy Landscape

  • FDA: Maintains rigorous standards for IV iron products; ongoing surveillance for hypersensitivity reactions.
  • EMA: Similar licensing with emphasis on safety.
  • Pricing & Reimbursement: Reimbursement rates impact uptake; policy shifts favor cost-effective therapies.
  • Orphan Drug Designation: Currently not applicable but may influence future indications.

Challenges and Risks

Challenge Impact Mitigation Strategies
Patent Expiry Increased generic competition R&D for new formulations/indications
Safety Concerns Regulatory scrutiny Ongoing safety monitoring, real-world evidence
Market Saturation Slowed growth Geographic expansion, differentiated offerings
Pricing Pressures Reduced margins Value-based pricing, health economics assessments

Future Outlook and Opportunities

  • The global intravenous iron market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 8.2% from 2023–2028 [1].
  • INFED’s long-established presence offers brand loyalty advantages.
  • Potential growth in indications such as anemia in cancer, CHF, and other chronic conditions.
  • Expansion into emerging markets offers significant upside due to high anemia prevalence.

Key Takeaways

  • The INFED market is positioned within a growing, competitive landscape driven by rising anemia prevalence and technological advances.
  • Strategic differentiation focusing on safety, dosing convenience, and market expansion are vital for maintaining and growing revenues.
  • The upcoming patent expiries and biosimilar entries necessitate innovation and investments in new indications.
  • Regulatory policies heavily influence market access and pricing strategies.
  • The total financial trajectory indicates a steady growth trend, with targeted expansion and innovation as critical success factors.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical advantages of INFED over other IV iron therapies?
INFED has a long-established safety record, with fewer hypersensitivity reactions compared to older formulations. Its efficacy in replenishing iron stores with single or fewer doses offers logistical and patient convenience advantages.

2. How does the patent landscape affect INFED’s market share?
Patent expiries could lead to generic competition, reducing pricing power and market share unless mitigated by innovation or expansion into new indications.

3. Which emerging markets present the most growth opportunities for INFED?
India, China, and Southeast Asia exhibit high anemia prevalence and expanding healthcare infrastructure, making them strategic focuses for market penetration.

4. How are regulatory policies influencing INFED’s positioning?
Strict safety standards and approval processes necessitate ongoing post-market surveillance, but supportive policies for IV iron therapies facilitate market access when safety profiles are favorable.

5. What future innovations could impact INFED’s market trajectory?
Development of extended dosing regimens, combination therapies, and biosimilars could enhance competitive advantage, alongside digital health integration for personalized treatment.


References

[1] MarketResearch.com, "Global Iron Deficiency Anemia Market," 2022
[2] WHO, "Iron Deficiency Anemia," 2021
[3] CDC, "Anemia Prevalence," 2022

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.