Last Updated: August 9, 2026

IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Ibuprofen And Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride, and what generic alternatives are available?

Ibuprofen And Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride is a drug marketed by Aurobindo Pharma, Perrigo, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd, Contract Pharmacal, and Strides Pharma. and is included in five NDAs.

The generic ingredient in IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE is ibuprofen; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride. There are sixty-four drug master file entries for this compound. Thirteen suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the ibuprofen; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Ibuprofen And Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride

A generic version of IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE was approved as ibuprofen; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride by STRIDES PHARMA on August 14th, 2006.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE?
  • What are the global sales for IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE?
Summary for IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Recent Clinical Trials for IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive MedizinPhase 1
Pharma Medica Research, Inc.Phase 1
Boehringer IngelheimPhase 1

See all IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE clinical trials

Pharmacology for IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Aurobindo Pharma IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE ibuprofen; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 209235-001 Dec 1, 2017 OTC No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Contract Pharmacal IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE ibuprofen; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 075588-001 Apr 8, 2002 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Perrigo IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE ibuprofen; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride SUSPENSION;ORAL 076478-001 Nov 5, 2003 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd IBUPROFEN AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE ibuprofen; pseudoephedrine hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 213565-001 Mar 10, 2023 OTC No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: July 12, 2026

Ibuprofen and Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride (OTC Combination): Market Dynamics, Revenue Trajectory, and Competitive Landscape

Executive summary: The ibuprofen plus pseudoephedrine hydrochloride combination is an established OTC cold and flu pain/ congestion product with mature, price-sensitive demand and frequent competitive entry through private label and authorized generics. Financial trajectory is driven by seasonal peaks, retail channel mix (mass, club, grocery, online), regulatory constraints on pseudoephedrine sourcing and sales, and ongoing product refresh cycles (count size, caplets vs tablets, “day/night” variants, store-brand formulations). Forecasted dynamics center on margin compression from generic/private label pressure and distribution-level promotional intensity, with steady volume rather than sustained premium pricing.


What is the US market size and demand pattern for ibuprofen plus pseudoephedrine OTC?

Featured snippet answer: Demand follows winter and spring cold/flu seasonality in the US, with highest sell-through in the fourth quarter through early second quarter. Volume is stable year-over-year absent adverse public health events, with pricing and mix doing most of the work for revenue.

Seasonal demand drivers

  • Cold/flu incidence is the primary volume driver.
  • Weather patterns and respiratory virus cycles shift timing by a few weeks to months.
  • Promotional resets in late Q3/Q4 pull forward purchases and can lift reported sell-in versus sell-through.

Channel economics that shape revenue

  • Mass retail and grocery dominate OTC movement for small-pack analgesic/congestion combinations.
  • Club stores favor value-per-count SKUs, raising baseline unit volumes but compressing per-unit net price.
  • Online increases SKU breadth (varied pack sizes, third-party marketplace), but promo intensity can keep net pricing low.

How do revenue and earnings typically evolve for OTC ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine products over 5–10 years?

Featured snippet answer: Revenue tends to track volume with limited pricing power; net sales growth relies on mix (pack size, “extended relief,” day/night variants), distribution expansion, and promotions. Gross margin usually compresses as branded share gives way to store brands and authorized generics.

Typical financial trajectory (pattern, not a forecasted company-by-company number)

  • Early life cycle (new brand introduction): faster unit growth, higher net pricing.
  • Maturity (mid-teens years): volume stabilizes, pricing flattens, promotional cadence increases.
  • Late maturity (current regime): revenue volatility is seasonal; structural margin pressure persists due to:
    • private label substitution
    • authorized generic competition
    • high retail shelf challenge versus multi-symptom competitors

What matters most for quarterly results

  • Sell-in timing around peak season.
  • Retailer inventory positions after prior season demand.
  • Share movement across congestion and pain category adjacencies:
    • pseudoephedrine “behind-the-counter” SKUs
    • alternative decongestants and phenylephrine-containing products
    • multi-ingredient cold/flu assortments that bundle analgesics plus antihistamines

What Orange Book status applies to ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine combination products?

Featured snippet answer: Most ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine combination OTC products are supported by a mature generic ecosystem; current market competition is generally driven by formulation and manufacturing process coverage rather than active long-term exclusivities.

Key practical implication for market entry and pricing

  • When combination patents are no longer enforceable, generics and authorized generics typically sustain low net prices.
  • Remaining patent thickets, when present, tend to be formulation-specific (e.g., extended release, stability, layering) or method-of-manufacture rather than the core actives.

(No specific Orange Book listing set can be produced here without product- and NDA/ANDA-level identifiers.)


Which regulatory constraints affect sales volumes for pseudoephedrine-containing OTC products?

Featured snippet answer: Pseudoephedrine is governed by limits on retail sales, logbook requirements (historically), and now electronic tracking tied to sales thresholds under US federal law, which affects distribution capacity and purchase conversion during peak demand.

What constraints do to commercial performance

  • Retail compliance friction can reduce conversion on shelf when consumers expect quick pickup.
  • Distributor ordering must align to retailer compliance workflows and inventory limits.
  • Alternative product substitution rises during periods of high demand when consumer behavior shifts toward easier-to-obtain decongestants.

Competitive substitution dynamics

  • Consumer choice shifts to:
    • phenylephrine combinations (where available)
    • non-pseudoephedrine decongestant formats
    • multi-symptom OTC products with different decongestant actives

How does the generic/private label landscape change pricing power for ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine?

Featured snippet answer: Competitive entry through generics and private label drives chronic price compression; branded differentiation is mostly packaging, trust, and promotional funding rather than true technical product advantage.

Private label mechanisms that reduce margin

  • Store brands replicate the same labeled actives (when permitted) and often take advantage of:
    • manufacturing scale efficiencies
    • fewer marketing spend requirements
    • aggressive “good-better-best” shelf ladders

Authorized generics and shelf placement

  • When authorized generics are present, they can maintain high availability but with lower pricing.
  • Retailers use these SKUs to protect shelf economics, pushing branded pricing down.

What product formats compete directly with ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine?

Featured snippet answer: The most direct competitors are other OTC decongestant-and-analgesic combinations, especially those bundling decongestion with pain relief in a single multi-symptom format.

Direct format clusters

  • Tablets/caplets: value and convenience.
  • Extended relief variants: compete for “fewer doses” perceived convenience, often higher price points.
  • Day/night dosing systems: compete for adherence and “complete symptom coverage,” usually supported by higher promotional investment.

Indirect substitutes with strong shelf pull

  • Multi-ingredient products that swap pseudoephedrine for another decongestant.
  • Single-ingredient analgesics (ibuprofen-only) plus separate decongestant purchase behavior.

What patent estate dynamics matter for this combination’s long-run competitiveness?

Featured snippet answer: For an established OTC combination of old actives, enforceable market power typically depends on residual IP around formulation, release profile, and manufacturing, not on the basic use of the actives.

Patent themes that can still affect market share

  • Extended-release or timed-release formulations
  • Stability and bioavailability-related formulation adjustments
  • Process patents for blending, granulation, coating, compression, or tablet layering
  • Packaging and dosage form combinations tied to specific label claims

Litigation and settlement implications for pricing

  • If litigation delays generic manufacturing or introduces carve-outs, the result is usually temporary pricing support for the authorized brand.
  • In mature OTC categories, settlements often translate to:
    • limited exclusivity windows for specific SKUs or dosage strengths
    • supply commitments in exchange for non-enforcement on certain product variants

(No specific, verified litigation docket can be listed without product-specific patent numbers.)


What generic entry risks exist for ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine, and when do they typically materialize?

Featured snippet answer: Generic entry risk is strongest at the point when remaining formulation/process patents expire for the exact dosage form and release profile used in the commercial SKU. When patents are already out of force, entry is already occurring through multiple manufacturers and the dominant risk shifts to retail promotion and stock availability.

What controls timing of substitution

  • Regulatory approval timelines (ANDA packaging and labeling readiness).
  • Manufacturing scale-up and quality-system readiness.
  • Retail procurement lead times ahead of seasonal peaks.

Competitive “step-change” events

  • Launches of a major retailer’s private label line.
  • Introduction of a new higher-margin format that shifts mix (extended relief or day/night).

How does ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine compare with ibuprofen-only or pseudoephedrine-only products economically?

Featured snippet answer: The combination typically monetizes consumer convenience and “bundle value,” but it faces structural margin compression because it also competes with lower-cost single-active purchases plus promotional add-ons.

Economic trade-offs for consumers

  • Single-active purchases often cost less per active dose and allow flexible symptom targeting.
  • Combination products win when consumers prefer one-stop shopping and fewer SKUs.

Implications for revenue trajectory

  • Combination brands grow fastest when they achieve:
    • stable share with premium packaging and trusted brand equity
    • retail placement at shelf ends or primary decongestant locations
  • Pricing power remains limited because substitution is straightforward.

What are the key commercial KPIs for assessing performance of this OTC category?

Featured snippet answer: Market share vs prior season, net price per unit after trade spend, velocity by channel, and inventory-to-sales ratios during peak weeks.

Primary KPIs

  • Unit velocity by retailer class (mass, grocery, club, online)
  • Net sales per pack after promotions and chargebacks
  • Mix: pack size and dosing frequency
  • Distribution points and in-stock rate
  • Retail promo intensity (% off, coupon incidence)
  • Inventory turns entering Q4 (proxy for confidence in season demand)

What is the competitive landscape by company type (brand owners vs generics vs retailers)?

Featured snippet answer: The market is characterized by brand incumbents plus multiple generic and private label suppliers; retailers increasingly set the economics through shelf strategy.

Competitive tiers

  1. Brand owners: maintain shelf recognition and funded promotions.
  2. Generic manufacturers: compete on low cost and supply reliability.
  3. Private label: capture incremental share through retailer economics and simplified procurement.

Why competition is intense

  • OTC combination ingredients are widely available and regulatory barriers are low once patents expire.
  • Consumers accept substitution, especially during winter when pricing sensitivity rises.

What settlement or exclusivity dynamics can affect near-term revenue?

Featured snippet answer: The near-term lever is not a one-time exclusivity event but continued SKU-level exclusivity (if any) plus retailer promotion cadence. Settlements matter if they constrain a specific dosage form or release profile.

What typically changes after a settlement

  • Reallocation of shelf share to the prevailing SKU.
  • Short-run pricing moves driven by supply and retail inventory needs.
  • Innovation stops or restarts around the constrained product variant.

(No verified settlement agreements or court timelines are included here because product-specific case details are not provided.)


How does manufacturing and supply chain risk influence price and availability?

Featured snippet answer: Seasonal supply constraints and raw material procurement issues can temporarily lift prices and create stock-outs, but persistent improvements are rare once multiple manufacturers scale.

Supply chain variables

  • Sourcing of pseudoephedrine-containing intermediates and compliant logistics
  • Bulk packaging lead times and stability requirements
  • Contract manufacturing capacity for peak months

What market outlook is implied by current dynamics for ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine OTC?

Featured snippet answer: The category is likely to remain stable in volume with margin pressure, with upside limited to mix improvements (pack format, fewer doses) and share gains through retail distribution strategies. Downside comes from substitution to other decongestant formats and persistent promo intensity.

Revenue growth levers that still work in mature OTC

  • Higher unit-per-visit SKUs (bigger pack sizes).
  • Dosing convenience that reduces perceived friction.
  • Retail execution: placement, availability, and promo timing.

Revenue headwinds

  • Lower average net prices due to store brands and authorized generics.
  • Regulatory and compliance friction that can reduce purchase conversion.
  • Category substitution toward other multi-symptom formats.

Key Takeaways

  • The ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine combination is a mature OTC market with strong seasonality and limited pricing power.
  • Revenue tracks volume, while net pricing and mix determine growth or decline quarter to quarter.
  • Pseudoephedrine regulatory controls affect conversion and retailer throughput, shifting substitution toward alternate cold/congestion products.
  • Competition is primarily driven by generic/private label presence and retail promotional intensity, not by ongoing fundamental IP barriers.
  • SKU-level differences (pack size, release profile, day/night formats) can move mix, but they do not typically restore long-term premium economics once generic competition scales.

FAQs

1) Why do ibuprofen and pseudoephedrine combo products have stronger sales in winter?

Winter respiratory virus incidence increases demand for analgesic-and-congestion symptom relief, creating a recurring seasonal spike in retail sell-through.

2) Do store-brand ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine products materially reduce branded sales?

Yes. Private label typically compresses net pricing and captures share where shelf economics and pack value favor the retailer’s own brand.

3) How does pseudoephedrine tracking affect OTC sell-through during peak demand?

Sales thresholds and compliance workflows can reduce purchase conversion speed, increasing the likelihood of substitution to other decongestant formats.

4) What determines whether a new generic can launch quickly?

The practical gating factors are regulatory readiness, manufacturing scale-up, and any remaining IP that applies to the specific dosage form and release profile.

5) Are extended-release versions more profitable than standard immediate-release SKUs?

Often yes at list price, but the profitability depends on how quickly competition erodes the premium and how heavily the extended-release SKU is promoted.


References

  1. US FDA. “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book).” Accessed 2026-07-12.
  2. US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). “Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act” and pseudoephedrine sales and reporting requirements. Accessed 2026-07-12.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.