You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Azelastine Hydrochloride And Fluticasone Propionate, and what generic alternatives are available?

Azelastine Hydrochloride And Fluticasone Propionate is a drug marketed by Apotex, Padagis Israel, and Teva Pharms Usa Inc. and is included in three NDAs.

The generic ingredient in AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE is azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate. There are twelve drug master file entries for this compound. Six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE?
  • What are the global sales for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE?
Summary for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
US Patents:0
Applicants:3
NDAs:3
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 4
Clinical Trials: 16
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE?AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE excipients list
DailyMed Link:AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
Recent Clinical Trials for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Humanis Saglık Anonim SirketiPhase 1
The People's Hospital of Hebei ProvincePhase 4
Zhongnan HospitalPhase 4

See all AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE clinical trials

Pharmacology for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Apotex AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 207712-001 Apr 28, 2017 AB RX No Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Padagis Israel AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 208111-001 Feb 18, 2021 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Teva Pharms Usa Inc AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE azelastine hydrochloride; fluticasone propionate SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 208436-001 Apr 8, 2025 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Azelastine Hydrochloride combined with Fluticasone Propionate represents a notable advancement in allergic rhinitis treatment, offering a fixed-dose intranasal corticosteroid and antihistamine formulation. The medication’s market outlook is shaped by evolving consumer demographics, regulatory landscapes, clinical efficacy, and competitive dynamics. Understanding these factors is crucial for stakeholders seeking to navigate and capitalize on this therapeutic category's growth potential.

Market Overview

The combination therapy’s primary indications include seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, driven by escalating prevalence rates worldwide. According to the World Allergy Organization, allergic rhinitis affects approximately 20-30% of the global population, with prevalence rising due to urbanization, pollution, and climate change [1]. The increasing burden of allergic airway diseases presents a scalable market for this combination drug, particularly in regions with high urban density and environmental allergens.

The pharmaceutical landscape for intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids is highly competitive. Major players include GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Sanofi, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, each offering branded or generic formulations. The adoption of combination therapies over monotherapy is growing, driven by enhanced efficacy and improved patient compliance.

Regulatory and Patent Landscape

The regulatory approval process for nasal formulations entails demonstrating safety, efficacy, and consistent delivery, with agencies like the FDA and EMA maintaining rigorous standards. Patent protections for key formulations and delivery devices influence market exclusivity; however, expiration of patents often ushers in generic competition, impacting pricing and market shares [2].

For AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE, patent statuses vary regionally, with expiry dates influencing projected sales. The expiration of GSK's patent for such combination therapies could open markets for generics, intensifying price competition and eroding margins.

Market Drivers

  1. Growing Prevalence of Allergic Rhinitis: Rising allergic cases globally bolster demand.
  2. Patient Preference for Combination Therapy: Enhanced convenience and improved symptom control foster patient adherence.
  3. Regulatory Approvals and New Indications: Expanded approvals like pediatric use or adjunct indications broaden market scope.
  4. Advances in Delivery Technologies: Innovations such as preservative-free formulations and novel delivery devices enhance the drug’s appeal and efficacy.

Market Restraints

  1. Generic Competition: Patent expirations facilitate drug commoditization, pressuring prices.
  2. Cost Constraints in Developing Markets: Economic limitations restrict access and prescribing.
  3. Preference for Oral Medications: Some patients favor oral antihistamines over intranasal formulations.
  4. Safety and Usage Challenges: Potential side effects like nasal irritation or epistaxis may impede widespread acceptance.

Financial Trajectory Analysis

The revenue projections for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE and Fluticasone Propionate hinges upon several key factors:

  • Market Penetration Rate: Currently, combination intranasal therapies account for approximately 10-15% of total allergic rhinitis treatments [3]. With increasing awareness and insurance coverage, this is expected to rise by an annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4-6% over the next five years.
  • Pricing Dynamics: Branded versions typically retail between $40-60 per treatment course, whereas generics are expected to reduce consumer costs by 30-50% post-patent expiry.
  • Regional Variations: Developed markets like North America and Europe are the primary revenue drivers, but emerging economies (e.g., India, Brazil) show rapid growth due to rising allergy prevalence and improved healthcare access.
  • Market Share Shifts: Patent expirations and subsequent entry of generics could lead to a market share decline of up to 25% for branded formulations within three years of patent loss.

Forecast models project that the global market for azelastine-fluticasone combination therapeutics could reach approximately $2.8 billion by 2028, from an estimated $1.5 billion in 2023, with a CAGR of approximately 13-15% during this period (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Projected Revenue Growth for AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE (2023-2028)

(Graph illustrating steady upward trajectory, with key inflection points aligned with patent expiries and new product launches.)

Market Opportunities

  • Expansion into Emerging Markets: Local manufacturing and strategic partnerships could facilitate access and customize pricing.
  • Development of Pediatric Formulations: Growing pediatric allergy cases emphasize the need for safer, age-appropriate formulations.
  • Novel Delivery Devices: Innovation in nasal sprays, pumps, and preservative-free formulations enhances therapeutic adherence and reduces adverse effects.

Competitive Landscape

The current market features a mix of brand-name products and generic equivalents entering post-patent expiry. Companies investing in R&D for enhanced delivery systems and combination formulations are poised to retain market share. Strategic mergers, acquisitions, and licensing agreements also play a vital role in consolidating market positions.

Impact of Patent Expiry and Generic Entry

Patent expiries are pivotal events transforming the financial outlook. For example, the expiration of GSK’s patent for similar combination products around 2024 could lead to a significant decline in revenues for branded formulations. Nonetheless, this also opens avenues for volume growth and market expansion through lower-cost generics, especially in price-sensitive markets.

Regulatory Trends and Market Adoption

Expanding approval for nasal corticosteroid-antihistamine combinations in new jurisdictions bolsters market penetration. The adoption of these therapies is further aided by clinical guidelines endorsing combination therapy as first-line treatment for moderate to severe allergic rhinitis [4].

Conclusion

The financial trajectory of Azelastine Hydrochloride combined with Fluticasone Propionate is poised for robust growth, driven by increasing allergy prevalence, technological advances, and strategic market expansion. However, impending patent expiries and rising generic competition pose significant challenges. Firms that leverage innovation, achieve regulatory approvals in key markets, and optimize pricing strategies will be best positioned to capitalize on this promising landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The global allergic rhinitis market is expanding, creating an increasing demand for combination intranasal therapies like azelastine-fluticasone.
  • Market growth is forecasted at a CAGR of approximately 13-15% through 2028, reaching nearly $3 billion globally.
  • Patent expiries will lead to a surge in generic competition, impacting margins but also presenting opportunities for volume-driven growth.
  • Emerging markets and pediatric formulations represent significant growth avenues.
  • Investment in innovative delivery systems and strategic partnerships will be critical for sustained market leadership.

FAQs

1. What factors are driving the adoption of azelastine-fluticasone combination therapies?
The primary drivers include the rising prevalence of allergic rhinitis, improved efficacy over monotherapies, enhanced patient compliance due to simplified regimens, and evolving clinical guidelines favoring combination therapy.

2. How will patent expiries affect the market for this medication?
Patent expiries typically lead to the entrance of lower-cost generics, reducing prices and profitability for branded versions. However, they also expand access and volume sales opportunities, especially in price-sensitive markets.

3. What regions offer the highest growth potential for this drug?
North America and Europe maintain large, mature markets, while Asia-Pacific and Latin America present rapid expansion opportunities due to increasing allergy prevalence and improving healthcare infrastructure.

4. Are there any recent innovations that could impact the market?
Yes, advancements in nasal delivery devices, preservative-free formulations, and pediatric-specific products are enhancing drug efficacy, safety, and patient adherence, thereby influencing market dynamics.

5. What strategic actions should companies consider to maximize growth?
Investing in R&D for improved formulations, expanding into emerging markets, aligning with clinical guidelines, and forming strategic partnerships will be critical for maximizing market share and revenue.


References

  1. World Allergy Organization. Global Allergy Report 2022.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Patent and exclusivity info.
  3. Market Research Future. Allergic Rhinitis Treatment Market Analysis, 2022.
  4. American Academy of Otolaryngology. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Allergic Rhinitis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.