Last Updated: August 8, 2026

ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Atovaquone And Proguanil Hydrochloride patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Atovaquone And Proguanil Hydrochloride is a drug marketed by Glenmark Pharms Ltd and Mylan and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE is atovaquone; proguanil hydrochloride. There are sixteen drug master file entries for this compound. Nine suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the atovaquone; proguanil hydrochloride profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Atovaquone And Proguanil Hydrochloride

A generic version of ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE was approved as atovaquone; proguanil hydrochloride by GLENMARK PHARMS LTD on January 12th, 2011.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE?
  • What are the global sales for ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE?
Summary for ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE
Recent Clinical Trials for ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Naval Medical Research Unit TWO (NAMRU-2)Phase 4
Naval Medical Research CenterPhase 4
Naval Environmental Preventive Medicine Unit TWO (NEPMU-2)Phase 4

See all ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE clinical trials

Pharmacology for ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Glenmark Pharms Ltd ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE atovaquone; proguanil hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 091211-002 Apr 6, 2015 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Mylan ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE atovaquone; proguanil hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 202362-002 May 27, 2014 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Glenmark Pharms Ltd ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE atovaquone; proguanil hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 091211-001 Jan 12, 2011 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Mylan ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE atovaquone; proguanil hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 202362-001 May 27, 2014 AB RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: July 23, 2026

ATOVAQUONE AND PROGUANIL HYDROCHLORIDE Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory: Sales Trends, Pricing, Exclusivity, and Competitive Pressure

Atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride (APC), marketed as Malarone and generics, is a travel-malaria prophylaxis and treatment product with a stable, but mature, market profile. Demand tracks closely to international travel volumes, outbreak intensity, and guideline-driven prescribing for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevention, with pricing pressure from generic penetration and channel rotation through wholesalers. The financial trajectory is dominated by (1) U.S. generic erosion dynamics, (2) ex-U.S. country-level tendering and reimbursement, and (3) inventory and supply cycles that affect quarterly sales more than product innovation.

What drives sales of atovaquone and proguanil for malaria prophylaxis and treatment?

How does travel volume move APC demand?

APC is a “travel-driven” anti-infective. Prophylaxis prescribing rises when international travel outbound from high-income markets increases and when seasonal exposure risk is elevated in popular destinations. Sales also respond to clinician and traveler preferences for shorter-course prophylaxis with daily dosing and perceived tolerability versus longer-history regimens.

Key demand levers:

  • International travel seasonality (peak travel quarters produce sharper demand curves).
  • Traveler mix shifts between business travel and tourism.
  • Guideline updates that affect first-line prophylaxis choices in specific geographies.
  • Penetration in pharmacies and travel clinics versus prescription-only channels in some markets.

What clinical use cases support repeat prescriptions?

APC is used for:

  • Malaria prophylaxis (uncomplicated risk prevention in non-immune travelers).
  • Treatment of uncomplicated malaria in many label contexts, often in combination with dosing regimens that can vary by region and guideline.

Sales consistency in mature periods typically comes from prophylaxis durability more than treatment episodes, because prophylaxis is repeated each travel season.

How do safety perceptions affect switching between malaria prophylaxis regimens?

APC competes with atovaquone/proguanil, mefloquine, doxycycline, and (region-dependent) other prophylaxis standards. Switching risk is tied to:

  • Side-effect profiles and adherence friction (daily vs weekly regimens).
  • Traveler concerns during adverse media cycles for alternatives.
  • Patient preference for short-course prophylaxis once exposure risk ends.

How has generic entry changed the financial trajectory of Malarone (atovaquone/proguanil)?

What is the post-brand economics after generic penetration?

In mature markets, APC financial performance typically declines from brand revenues to a largely commoditized generic category. The brand’s remaining value is concentrated in:

  • Residual reimbursement coverage for branded product.
  • Patient-specific prescriber preference where formularies keep at least one non-preferred SKU.
  • Channels that support “travel clinic” sourcing rather than strict lowest-cost procurement.

Once multiple AB-rated generics compete, pricing compresses toward acquisition cost plus modest margin, shifting revenue risk from utilization to procurement competitiveness.

What pricing and rebate mechanics typically shape APC category margins?

  • Pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) contracts tend to drive rapid net-price declines as generics gain share.
  • Wholesaler buying patterns can create short-term volatility.
  • State Medicaid and federal procurement contracts often anchor the category price floor.

How many competitors typically participate in the U.S. oral tablet market?

The U.S. APC market is generally characterized by multiple generic manufacturers with AB-rated versions. Exact manufacturer counts and current NDC-level competition depend on FDA ANDA approvals and label strengths (adult vs pediatric fixed-dose combinations), but the economic pattern is consistent: margin erosion accelerates after the second and third substantive generic entry and continues as additional SKUs gain adoption.

When does exclusivity or patent protection expire, and when does generic competition accelerate?

What exclusivity periods historically shape the APC timeline?

APC in branded form has already passed key branded exclusivity milestones in most major markets. Financial trajectory in recent years is therefore less about brand launch exclusivity and more about:

  • Patent expiry that removes manufacturing and formulation constraints.
  • Ongoing litigation that can delay or narrow generic approvals in specific jurisdictions.
  • Country-by-country tender cycles that determine market share loss speed.

What generic entry risks exist around formulation or method-of-use?

For small-molecule, generic “entry timing” is frequently influenced by:

  • Secondary patents (formulations, process, particle size, solid-state properties, manufacturing method).
  • Method-of-use patents for prophylaxis dosing or treatment regimens in defined populations.

Those secondary patents rarely stop category entry indefinitely but can create incremental barriers that affect which generic launches first and how aggressively they price.

What patents protect atovaquone/proguanil hydrochloride in the key jurisdictions?

How do patent estates typically look for a mature fixed-dose combination?

For older small-molecule fixed-dose products, patent estates often narrow to:

  • Manufacturing processes.
  • Specific salt forms and formulation compositions for oral tablets.
  • Packaging and stability-related claims in some cases.

Because APC is a well-established combination, the remaining active patent set in major markets is usually limited, with any enforceable rights typically concentrated in specific jurisdictions, specific dose strengths, and/or specific manufacturing methods.

Which companies typically hold the remaining IP or commercial rights?

In established categories, brand-holder rights and any remaining secondary patents can be separated among:

  • Brand manufacturer and assignee entities for the original patents.
  • Process/filer entities for manufacturing improvements.
  • Generic challengers and their patent counsel where patent settlements narrow disputes.

A full “who owns what” map requires exact Orange Book listings and active family status by jurisdiction, but the economic read-through is direct: after brand maturation and settlement outcomes, competition is driven by procurement and net-price dynamics more than by IP complexity.

What is the Orange Book status of atovaquone/proguanil, and how many listed patents matter for generic challengers?

How to interpret Orange Book impact for APC

Orange Book listings for fixed-dose combination products usually include:

  • Drug substance and formulation patents.
  • Use patents tied to indications (prophylaxis and/or treatment).
  • Expiry and listed claim numbers that define the scope of Paragraph IV exposure.

In practice for APC, the market-facing question is:

  • Which listed patents have already expired.
  • Which are still listed and whether they are “weak” (near-term expiration with limited enforcement) or “blocking” (still enforceable and actively litigated).

How many patents tend to be “blocking” at a given time?

Mature generic categories commonly have a long list of historic patents, but only a small subset is still relevant to current generic launch timing. Financial effects are determined by the blocking patents that remain in force at the time a generic ANDA is ready to launch.

What Paragraph IV challenges and settlements affect the U.S. generic launch cadence?

How do Paragraph IV outcomes translate into sales volatility?

For APC, settlement outcomes generally affect:

  • The first-to-launch generic’s ability to enter at full strength and full label.
  • Launch delay windows that shift share to the branded product or to existing generics.
  • Timing of stocking and pharmacy substitution patterns.

Category sales volatility is typically concentrated in quarters around:

  • Authorized generic periods.
  • First generic launch windows after a stay lifts.
  • Settlement-driven “carve-out” periods.

Which legal events matter most for commercial trajectory?

The market-impacting legal events are:

  • Federal court decisions tied to patent validity or non-infringement.
  • Settlement agreements that define “tactical launch” dates.
  • Stipulations affecting labeling, strength-specific entry, and distribution scope.

How does FDA status shape availability and commercial throughput?

What is the typical FDA regulatory structure for APC tablets?

APC tablets are typically manufactured under ANDA approvals for generics and NDA labeling for brand. Availability depends on:

  • Manufacturing site approvals.
  • Stability and dissolution specifications for each strength.
  • Ongoing compliance and batch release time.

How do manufacturing interruptions affect quarterly revenue?

For commodity-like oral solids, supply disruptions can:

  • Temporarily lift prices where shortages allow net-price stabilization.
  • Create backorders that push revenue between quarters.
  • Trigger “channel filling” after shortages end, producing catch-up shipments.

These effects can be more visible than clinical demand shifts in quarterly financial statements.

How does atovaquone/proguanil compare with competing malaria prophylaxis drugs in the same markets?

Direct competitors and economic behavior

APC competes with:

  • Mefloquine (alternative weekly prophylaxis in some guidelines and regions).
  • Doxycycline (low-cost, adherence dependent).
  • Other fixed-dose antimalarials where prophylaxis is indicated depending on region.

Category share is shaped by:

  • Net pricing and formulary placement.
  • Traveler preference and side-effect profiles.
  • Availability and procurement contracts for travel medicine programs.

Competitive substitution patterns

  • If doxycycline is heavily discounted, APC may lose share where adherence supports daily dosing.
  • If specific alternatives face safety concerns in a region, APC can gain share even at higher net prices.
  • If mefloquine availability is constrained, clinicians may rotate toward APC.

What manufacturing and IP barriers raise the cost of entry for generic ATC/APC tablets?

What controls generic manufacturing feasibility?

For solid oral combinations, barriers include:

  • Fixed-dose ratio control and dissolution equivalence.
  • Stability of the proguanil component and tablet integrity over shelf life.
  • Process controls for consistent content uniformity and bioequivalence.

How do quality and bioequivalence affect launch timing?

Generic developers manage:

  • BE studies that can delay launch schedules.
  • Analytical method validation that affects batch release timelines.
  • Scale-up and stability commitments that define commercialization readiness.

In mature molecules, these are the main “technical” constraints rather than novel chemistry IP.

What is the revenue exposure of APC to substitution, tendering, and guideline shifts?

Revenue is driven more by procurement than by new patient starts

In mature prophylaxis categories, “revenue exposure” comes from:

  • Share shifts among generics (net price and rebate dynamics).
  • Country tender cycles (award periods determine quarterly flow).
  • Formulary changes in U.S. and Europe.

Where is margin risk highest?

Margin risk tends to be highest where:

  • Multiple generics compete aggressively on price.
  • Rebates and administrative fees are high.
  • Wholesaler inventory cycles reduce end-user sell-through during downturns.

Key Key Takeaways

  • Atovaquone/proguanil is a mature travel-malaria prophylaxis and uncomplicated malaria treatment category where demand is dominated by international travel volumes and guideline-driven prescribing.
  • The financial trajectory has shifted from brand-led growth to category economics defined by generic penetration, PBM/formulary mechanics, and tender-driven net pricing.
  • IP and FDA mechanics shape timing at the margin, but the commercial outcome is primarily procurement and channel substitution rather than active innovation.
  • Competitive pressure comes from low-cost prophylaxis alternatives and multiple generic ATP/APC tablets, with margin compression after additional generic launches.

FAQs

1) Which destinations most influence atovaquone/proguanil prophylaxis demand?

Demand spikes track regions with consistent malaria risk that attract high outbound travel, with seasonality driven by travel patterns and local outbreak intensity.

2) What tablet strengths drive most APC commercial volume?

Volume typically concentrates in commonly prescribed adult fixed-dose strengths and pediatric dosing equivalents where markets support child dosing.

3) Do formulation patents materially delay generic entry for APC?

In mature fixed-dose oral categories, formulation patents can delay specific launches, but they usually do not stop category entry once blocking claims expire or settlements lift stays.

4) How does switching between malaria prophylaxis regimens affect APC share?

Switching is driven by net pricing and adherence perceptions among travelers, plus regional safety communications affecting alternative prophylaxis options.

5) Are there meaningful biosimilar risks for atovaquone/proguanil?

No. APC is a small-molecule drug combination, so biosimilar frameworks do not apply; the competitive framework is generics and authorized generics.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed 2026-07-23).
  2. FDA. ANDA information for atovaquone/proguanil hydrochloride (Malarone) (Accessed 2026-07-23).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.