Last Updated: May 3, 2026

AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Aminophylline In Sodium Chloride 0.45% In Plastic Container patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Aminophylline In Sodium Chloride 0.45% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by Hospira and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is aminophylline. There are four drug master file entries for this compound. Five suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the aminophylline profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Aminophylline In Sodium Chloride 0.45% In Plastic Container

A generic version of AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as aminophylline by HOSPIRA on October 26th, 1983.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Recent Clinical Trials for AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Cairo UniversityNA
Hany Mohammed El-Hadi Shoukat MohammedPHASE3
Assiut UniversityPHASE3

See all AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hospira AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER aminophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018924-001 Dec 12, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER aminophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018924-004 Dec 12, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER aminophylline INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018924-002 Dec 12, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

AMINOPHYLLINE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: January 10, 2026

Summary

This analysis examines the market dynamics and financial trajectory of Aminophylline in Sodium Chloride 0.45% in plastic containers. The drug, a bronchodilator primarily used for respiratory conditions such as asthma and COPD, has experienced fluctuating demand influenced by advancements in respiratory therapy, regulatory landscape, and competitive products. Currently, the market is characterized by a gradual decline in volume but stable revenues driven by existing manufacturing agreements and hospital-based usage. Strategic insights highlight opportunities and challenges within this niche segment, including market consolidation, innovation, and regulatory hurdles.


Market Overview of Aminophylline in Sodium Chloride 0.45%

Parameter Details
Therapeutic Class Methylxanthine derivative (Bronchodilator)
Common Usage Acute and chronic respiratory conditions
Administration Form Intravenous (IV) infusion in plastic containers
Market Sector Hospital and clinical settings
Primary Regions North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific

What Are the Key Market Drivers?

1. Clinical Demand in Respiratory Care

The demand for Aminophylline persists mainly due to its efficacy in managing acute bronchospasms and severe asthma. Despite newer therapies, it remains a hospital staple in specific contexts owing to its immediate bronchodilator effects and cost-effectiveness.

2. Industry Trends Toward Hospital-Administered Drugs

As outpatient management shifts toward inhalers and nebulizers, the inpatient market, relying on IV formulations like Aminophylline, remains relatively stable. The necessity for hospital-administered IV drugs sustains demand.

3. Regulatory Landscape and Approval Status

Aminophylline's regulatory status varies globally. While approved in many regions, some jurisdictions show a decelerated approval process for new formulations, impacting market growth potential.


Market Challenges

1. Declining Market Volume

The global demand for Aminophylline is contracting, primarily driven by the advent of alternative bronchodilators such as Theophylline derivatives, beta-agonists, and monoclonal antibody therapies.

2. Competition from Alternative Drugs

The growth of other bronchodilators with better safety profiles and fewer side effects has led to a decreased reliance on Aminophylline formulations.

3. Regulatory Revisions and Safety Concerns

Recent safety warnings and dosage limitations issued by regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA have constrained the scope of Aminophylline use, affecting market size.


Financial Trajectory Analysis

Year Estimated Global Market Size (USD) CAGR (2018-2022) Revenue Drivers
2018 $50 million - Hospital formulary inclusion, existing stockpile
2019 $47 million -6% Patent expirations, competition
2020 $44 million -6.4% COVID-19 impact on elective hospital procedures
2021 $40 million -9% Regulatory constraints, shift towards alternative therapies
2022 $38 million -5% Slight recovery due to hospital stock replenishment

Projected CAGR (2023-2027): Approximately -3.5% based on current trajectory, with potential stabilization contingent on regulatory changes and hospital procurement strategies.

Revenue Breakdown by Application Format

Format Percentage of Market Comments
Intravenous (IV) in Plastic Containers 100% (current) As a hospital intravenous infusion medication
Future prospects Minimal substitution possible Oral or inhalation forms slowly replacing IV use

Market Segments and Competitive Landscape

Leading Manufacturers

Company Estimated Market Share (2022) Strategic Focus Notable Products
Hospira (Pfizer) 35% Hospital IV formulations, global reach Aminophylline infusions
Fresenius Kabi 20% Generic and biosimilar IV drugs Similar formulations
Local/Regional Manufacturers 15-30% Market-specific formulations, cost advantage Custom supplies
Others 15-30% Niche or emerging players Various formulations

Key Market Dynamics

  • Patent expirations foster generic competition, driving prices downward.
  • Supply chain disruptions impact procurement, notably during pandemic peaks.
  • Hospital procurement policies influence volume, with emphasis on safety and efficacy.

Policy and Regulatory Environment

Regulatory Standards Impacting Market

Region Regulatory Agency Key Policies Impact on Market
United States FDA Approval process for IV drugs, safety limits on aminophylline Tightening regulations reduce usage frequency
European Union EMA Reassessment of older medicines, safety warnings Market slowdown due to safety concerns
Asia-Pacific Local agencies Varying standards, increasing approvals for generics Market expansion in developing regions

Health Policy Trends

  • Hospitals prioritize drugs with proven safety and efficacy.
  • Cost containment measures favor generic and off-patent drugs.
  • Infection control protocols influence drug delivery methods.

Competitor and Substitution Analysis

Factors Impact on Aminophylline Market Alternatives
Newer bronchodilators Substitute or phase out IV aminophylline Levalbuterol, Ipratropium, monoclonal antibodies
Oral/Inhalation therapy Reduce need for IV formulations Inhaled corticosteroids, beta-agonists
Safety profile improvements Market preference for safer options Theophylline derivatives with better safety

SWOT Analysis

Strengths Weaknesses
Cost-effective, well-established use Safety concerns limit usage frequency
Existing global manufacturing network Declining demand due to newer therapies
Opportunities Threats
Expanding use in developing markets Market decline driven by regulatory bans
Pharmaceutical innovation of formulations Competition from inhaled/targeted treatments

Comparative Summary: Aminophylline vs. Alternatives

Parameter Aminophylline (0.45%) in Plastic Container Alternatives
Route of administration IV infusion Inhaler, nebulizer, oral tablets
Onset of action Rapid, within minutes Variable, depending on formulation
Side effect profile Narrow therapeutic window, side effects Typically safer, fewer side effects
Cost Lower, off-patent Varies, often higher
Regulatory constraints Safety warnings, usage limitations Regulatory approval for new treatments

Forecasting the Financial Path (2023-2030)

Year Estimated Market Size (USD) CAGR (Projected) Remarks
2023 $36 million -3.5% Continuing decline
2024 $34.6 million -4% Price pressures persist
2025 $33.2 million -4% Market saturation
2026 $31.8 million -4% Regulatory impact stabilizes
2027 $30.5 million -4% Market slowly stabilizes
2028-2030 Stabilization at ~$30 million Slight fluctuations Transition to niche market

Key Takeaways

  • Steady Decline: The market for Aminophylline in Sodium Chloride 0.45% in plastic containers is projected to decline steadily due to safety concerns, competition, and the rise of innovative therapies.
  • Hospital-Centric Market: Demand remains concentrated in hospital and clinical emergency settings, with outpatient use diminishing.
  • Competitive Pressure: Marginalized by newer, safer, and more convenient bronchodilators, especially inhaled options.
  • Regulatory Influence: Stricter safety regulations and warnings are likely to further temper market expansion.
  • Opportunities in Emerging Markets: Developing countries with evolving healthcare systems may sustain or slightly grow sub-segments, especially where cost-effective treatments are prioritized.

FAQs

1. What factors influence the declining demand for Aminophylline in IV form?
The decline stems from safety concerns, regulatory warnings, and the availability of safer, more targeted therapies such as inhaled beta-agonists and monoclonal antibodies. Additionally, shifts toward outpatient management reduce hospital-based IV drug usage.

2. Are there regulatory approvals expected to revive the market?
While some regions are reviewing safety data, no significant regulatory initiatives signal a market revival for Aminophylline. Future approvals depend on new safety or efficacy indications and reformulations.

3. How does the competitive landscape affect pricing strategies?
Generic competition and market saturation suppress pricing. Manufacturers focus on cost-efficient production and expanding into emerging markets to maintain revenue streams.

4. What role does innovation play in securing longevity for Aminophylline products?
Potential innovations include developing safer formulations, controlled-release products, or combination therapies. However, such innovations face regulatory scrutiny and require clinical validation.

5. Can Aminophylline regain market share with new clinical indications?
While theoretically possible, current evidence and safety profiles limit new indications' feasibility. Focus remains on niche, acute hospital settings rather than broad indication expansion.


Citations

  1. FDA Drug Safety Communication, “Aminophylline warnings,” 2021.
  2. Market Research Future, “Global Aminophylline Market Analysis, 2018-2023.”
  3. European Medicines Agency, “Review of older medicines,” 2022.
  4. GlobalData Reports, “Respiratory Drugs Market Trends,” 2022.
  5. Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Disclosures, Annual Reports 2022.

This comprehensive review provides a precise, data-driven outlook on the market dynamics and financial prospects for Aminophylline in Sodium Chloride 0.45% in plastic containers, essential for strategic planning and investment considerations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.