You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for PRADAXA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


PRADAXA

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 022512 NDA Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0597-0108-54 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (0597-0108-54) / 60 CAPSULE in 1 BOTTLE 2015-11-23
Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 022512 NDA Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0597-0108-60 10 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (0597-0108-60) / 6 CAPSULE in 1 BLISTER PACK 2015-11-23
Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 022512 NDA Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0597-0355-09 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (0597-0355-09) / 60 CAPSULE in 1 BOTTLE 2011-08-08
Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 022512 NDA Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0597-0355-56 60 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (0597-0355-56) / 1 CAPSULE in 1 BLISTER PACK 2011-08-08
Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 022512 NDA Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0597-0360-55 1 BOTTLE in 1 CARTON (0597-0360-55) / 60 CAPSULE in 1 BOTTLE 2017-07-28
Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 022512 NDA Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. 0597-0360-82 60 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (0597-0360-82) / 1 CAPSULE in 1 BLISTER PACK 2017-07-28
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Pradaxa

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate) stands as a leading oral anticoagulant prescribed to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Since its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2010, Pradaxa’s manufacturing and sourcing have become focal points for pharmaceutical supply chain stability, market competition, and regulatory oversight. This article explores the key suppliers involved in Pradaxa’s production, the dynamics shaping its supply chain, and the implications for stakeholders.


Manufacturers of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)

The core of Pradaxa’s supply chain begins with the production of its active pharmaceutical ingredient, dabigatran etexilate. This component’s integrity, quality, and availability hinge upon a handful of specialized chemical manufacturers.

Major API Suppliers

Historically, the primary suppliers of dabigatran etexilate API include:

  • Boehringer Ingelheim: As the originator and patent holder of Pradaxa, Boehringer Ingelheim controls significant API production facilities. Their in-house manufacturing guarantees adherence to strict quality parameters and regulatory compliance, aligning with global standards such as GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice). They are also involved in the continuous development and scaling of API production processes to meet global demand.

  • Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs): Besides in-house production, Boehringer Ingelheim collaborates with other specialized chemical synthesis firms globally. These CMOs are situated primarily in Asia (e.g., China and India), providing cost-effective, high-volume API synthesis capabilities. Examples include companies like Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co. Ltd. and WeiGuo Pharmaceutical, which have been involved in complex organic synthesis for API production.

  • Other Suppliers: While Boehringer Ingelheim dominates API manufacturing, other specialized chemical firms occasionally produce dabigatran intermediates required for synthesis and supply. These firms are often chosen based on capacity, quality, and regulatory compliance.

Supply Chain Risks

Dependence on a limited number of API suppliers exposes Pradaxa’s manufacturing to risks such as supply disruptions, geopolitical issues, or quality lapses. Consequently, Boehringer Ingelheim maintains strategic reserves and multiple supplier relationships to mitigate such risks.


Excipients and Formulation Components

Apart from the API, Pradaxa capsule formulation depends on excipients, including gelatin for capsule shells, titanium dioxide (for coloration), and other inactive ingredients.

  • Glazing and Capsule Manufacturers: Major pharmaceutical packaging firms supply gelatin capsules, notably Catalent and Capsugel (Lonza). These companies possess extensive manufacturing facilities ensuring the consistent quality and supply of pharmaceutical-grade capsules.

  • Excipients Suppliers: Global excipients suppliers, such as BASF, Evonik, and Dow Chemical, provide specialty ingredients like stabilizers, binders, and fillers, which must meet pharmaceutical standards.


Manufacturing Facilities and Quality Assurance

Boehringer Ingelheim’s manufacturing campuses, primarily located in Germany and the United States, operate under stringent quality protocols. Their integrated manufacturing process from API synthesis to final capsule filling ensures tight quality control.

Contract manufacturers are similarly subject to the same rigorous GMP standards dictated by regulatory authorities like the FDA, EMA (European Medicines Agency), and other national agencies. These standards ensure the consistency, purity, and safety of Pradaxa.


Distribution and Logistics Channels

Manufacturers and suppliers utilize extensive logistics networks for distribution. Key regions include North America, Europe, Asia, and emerging markets. Supply chain resilience depends on robust warehousing, transport infrastructure, and inventory management.


Regulatory Oversight and Certification

Suppliers are required to obtain and maintain certifications such as:

  • FDA Approval: For companies manufacturing or distributing within the US.
  • EDQM Certification: European Pharmacopoeia standards compliance.
  • ISO Certifications: Ensuring quality management and environmental standards.

Regulatory compliance, coupled with regular audits, safeguards the supply chain and maintains public trust.


Market Competition and Supplier Dynamics

The patent exclusivity of Pradaxa expired in numerous jurisdictions by 2018, leading to the entry of generic manufacturers. This shift has diversified the supplier landscape for the drug’s API and formulations.

  • Generic Manufacturers: Companies such as Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma and Accord Healthcare have developed generic versions, sourcing API from various global suppliers, including third-party CMOs in Asia.
  • Impacts on Supply: While generics increase availability and reduce costs, they also introduce variability depending on supplier quality and regulatory adherence, emphasizing the importance of robust supplier qualification processes.

Key Challenges and Considerations

  • Supply Chain Disruptions: Political tensions, COVID-19-related factory shutdowns, and raw material shortages can impact API and formulation supplies.

  • Quality Control: Ensuring consistent API quality is paramount to prevent adverse events and maintain drug efficacy.

  • Pricing Dynamics: Competition among API suppliers influences procurement costs, affecting overall pricing strategies for pharmaceutical companies.

  • Environmental and Ethical Standards: Suppliers are increasingly expected to adhere to sustainable and ethical manufacturing practices, including waste management and fair labor conditions.


Conclusion

The supply of Pradaxa involves a complex network of API manufacturers, excipient suppliers, and distribution channels, primarily coordinated by Boehringer Ingelheim. While the company maintains tight control over its core API production, reliance on global CMOs introduces elements of risk alongside opportunities for cost efficiency and scalability.

The evolving landscape of generic competition and regulatory scrutiny further shapes supplier choices and supply chain resilience. A thorough understanding of these supplier dynamics enables stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding sourcing, risk management, and investment strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Dominant API Supplier: Boehringer Ingelheim remains the primary API manufacturer for Pradaxa, complemented by validated CMOs in Asia.
  • Diversified Supply Chain: Increasing generics have diversified suppliers, emphasizing quality assurance and regulatory compliance.
  • Supply Chain Risks: Disruptions and quality lapses pose potential threats; strategic stockpiling and multiple sourcing mitigate these risks.
  • Regulatory Standards: Certification and compliance processes maintain supply chain integrity across regions.
  • Market Dynamics: Competitive pressures and patent expirations influence supplier relationships and cost structures.

FAQs

1. Who are the main suppliers of Pradaxa’s active pharmaceutical ingredient?
Boehringer Ingelheim manufactures most of Pradaxa’s API internally, with additional sourcing from specialized contract manufacturers primarily located in Asia, such as Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine and WeiGuo Pharmaceutical.

2. How does the expiration of Pradaxa’s patent affect its supply chain?
Patent expiration has led to increased generic manufacturing, expanding the pool of API suppliers and formulation producers, which enhances supply flexibility but also necessitates rigorous quality oversight.

3. What risks are associated with Pradaxa’s supply chain?
Risks include raw material shortages, geopolitical factors affecting API production, quality control failures, and logistical disruptions. Diversification and regulatory compliance are key mitigation strategies.

4. Are there alternative suppliers for Pradaxa’s excipients and formulation components?
Yes. Major pharmaceutical excipient suppliers like BASF and Evonik provide the necessary inactive ingredients, and capsule manufacturers like Catalent and Lonza produce the capsule shells.

5. What regulatory requirements do Pradaxa suppliers need to meet?
Suppliers must adhere to GMP standards validated by agencies such as the FDA, EMA, and EDQM, including regular audits, certifications, and documentation of source material quality.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate) approval. 2010.
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pradaxa assessment report. 2012.
[3] Boehringer Ingelheim. Corporate website and manufacturing disclosures. 2022.
[4] IHS Markit. Global API market reports. 2022.
[5] PharmTech. Supply chain risk management in pharmaceuticals. 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.