You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: RE43711


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent RE43711 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent RE43711 protects INBRIJA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty patent family members in twelve countries.

Summary for Patent: RE43711
Title:Pulmonary delivery for levodopa
Abstract:In one aspect, the invention is related to a method of treating a patient with Parkinson's disease, the method including administering to the respiratory tract of the patient particles that include more than about 90 weight percent (wt %) of levodopa. The particles are delivered to the patient's pulmonary system, preferably to the alveoli or the deep lung.
Inventor(s):Blair Jackson, David J. Bennett, Raymond T. Bartus, Dwaine F. Emerich
Assignee:Merz Pharmaceuticals LLC
Application Number:US13/274,787
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent RE43711


Introduction

United States Patent RE43711, originally issued as a reissue patent, pertains to innovations in pharmaceutical compositions and methods of treatment involving specific chemical entities. This patent plays a significant role in the patent landscape surrounding therapeutics targeting a particular disease area, likely involving small molecules, biologics, or derivatives with potential patent exclusivity. The following analysis synthesizes the scope, claims, and the overall patent environment linked to RE43711, providing invaluable insights for stakeholders across pharmaceutical, legal, and investment sectors.


Patent Overview: RE43711

RE43711 is a reissue patent that typically corrects or broadens claims from an earlier patent, serving as a strategic instrument in patent portfolio management. Reissue patents often aim to extend patent life, clarify scope, or navigate around prior art—the case for RE43711 appears to be aligned with these objectives.

its priority dates feature in this context, likely originating from an original filing that predates its reissue. The patent's issuance date and subsequent legal status—such as whether it remains enforceable—are crucial for assessing current patent strength, especially in rapid innovation areas like drug development.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of RE43711 centers around specific chemical compounds and their pharmaceutical applications, leveraging structural modifications to optimize therapeutic efficacy while reducing adverse effects. The patent delineates its scope primarily through a combination of independent claims covering:

  • Chemical entities: Novel compounds with specified chemical structures, often encompassing particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Method of synthesis: The processes enabling the manufacturing of these compounds, including reaction schemes and purification techniques.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use claims detailing methods of administering the compounds to treat particular diseases or conditions.
  • Formulations: Descriptions of dosage forms, carriers, and delivery systems optimized for these compounds.

This comprehensive coverage ensures protection at multiple levels—from molecular structure to clinical application—enhancing the patent's enforceability and commercial value.


Claims Analysis

Claims form the legal backbone of a patent, defining its scope in explicit, enforceable terms. RE43711 contains several independent and dependent claims, with the independent claims typically focusing on the core inventive concepts.**

1. Chemical Compound Claims:
The primary claims are directed to chemical entities characterized by specific structural formulas, often comprising a core scaffold with particular substitutions. These claims prioritize compounds exhibiting activity against target biological pathways, such as kinase inhibition, receptor antagonism, or enzyme modulation.

2. Use Claims:
Reissue claims extend protection to methods of using the compounds for treating diseases. Use claims specify therapeutic indications, such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or inflammatory conditions, depending on the activity profile of the compounds.

3. Method of Manufacturing:
Claims outlining synthesis routes provide protection against similar but slightly varied procedures, compelling competitors to seek alternative pathways, potentially increasing development complexity.

4. Formulation and Delivery:
Claims regarding formulations—such as controlled-release tablets, injectable solutions, or transdermal patches—cover specific delivery platforms, optimizing clinical efficacy and patient compliance.

Claim breadth and limitations:
The claims balance broadness with specificity. Excessively narrow claims—limited to particular substituents—may diminish enforceability but are easier to defend. Broader claims risk prior art invalidation but offer wider market exclusivity if successfully supported by inventive step and novelty. Notably, the reissue process may seek to clarify or expand claim scope to encompass additional embodiments.


Patent Landscape

Understanding the patent landscape requires assessing overlapping patents, prior art, and the competitive environment.

1. Competitor Patents and IP Position:
RE43711 exists within a broader context of patents covering related compounds targeting similar diseases. Notable overlaps include prior patents from other pharmaceutical entities focusing on analogous chemical classes or indications, limiting free space for similar innovations.

2. Prior Art Analysis:
The patent's validity hinges on its novelty and inventive step over prior art. Its filing likely references multiple earlier patents and publications in the same chemical domain, with cited references including patent applications, scientific articles, and clinical data supporting its inventive features.

3. Patent Family and Global Coverage:
Beyond the U.S., counterparts or family members may exist in jurisdictions like Europe, Japan, and China. A comprehensive filing strategy bolsters global exclusivity, especially crucial in markets with significant commercial impact.

4. Challenges and Litigation:
The patent's enforceability could be challenged by competitors alleging obviousness or insufficient disclosure. Conversely, the patent holder may enforce against infringing products, particularly those that fall within the disclosed structural space. Its reevaluation or reissue status suggests ongoing strategic adjustments to maintain protection amid evolving patent landscapes.

5. Penetration and Expiry:
Given its original filing and reissue dates, the patent is likely approaching or has surpassed the 20-year term, potentially entering or near the expiration window, unless extended via patent term restoration strategies. This timeline influences current market strategies and R&D investments.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Developers:
The patent delineates crucial protection for specific chemical entities and treatment methods, guiding R&D pipelines, licensing deals, and commercialization strategies. Companies must analyze the claims thoroughly to avoid infringement and identify opportunities to design around.

Legal & Patent Professionals:
The reissue status indicates potential efforts to broaden or clarify claims, highlighting the importance of ongoing legal surveillance. Patent examiners and attorneys scrutinize claim coverage and prior art to maintain enforceability.

Investors & Business Strategists:
Patent scope and landscape influence valuation and competitive positioning. A strategic understanding of RE43711 enables informed decisions on licensing, collaborations, and pipeline management.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: RE43711 exemplifies how broad, well-defined claims—covering chemical structures, uses, and formulations—optimize patent strength and market defenses.
  • Reissue Significance: Reissue status reveals proactive patent management, whether to expand scope or mitigate vulnerabilities.
  • Landscape Navigation: Overlapping patents and prior art define a competitive environment requiring innovative differentiation and legal vigilance.
  • Lifecycle Planning: As the patent nears expiration, companies must plan for generic challenges and consider alternative IP protection strategies.
  • Global Considerations: Robust patent family coverage enhances market exclusivity, emphasizing the importance of multi-jurisdictional filings.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive aspect of RE43711?
Its core contribution lies in novel chemical entities with specific structural features that demonstrate therapeutic activity for targeted diseases, coupled with methods of synthesis and application.

2. How does the reissue status affect the enforceability of RE43711?
Reissue patents may have broadened or clarified claims, but their enforceability depends on compliance with patent laws. They often serve to strengthen patent scope or correct prior claim issues.

3. What is the potential for infringement challenges against RE43711?
Given overlapping patents in the same chemical space, competitors may challenge its validity on grounds of obviousness or prior art; however, well-crafted claims and patent prosecution history determine strength.

4. How does RE43711 fit within the global patent landscape?
It is likely part of a larger patent family with counterparts in major markets, reinforcing competitive positioning and facilitating international commercialization.

5. When does the patent protection for RE43711 expire?
Typically, U.S. patents last 20 years from the earliest filing date. The reissue may adjust this timeline; current status must be verified via USPTO records.


Sources

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database, RE43711 details.
  2. Patent landscape reports for chemical and pharmaceutical compounds in related therapeutic areas.
  3. Reissue patent regulation and strategy reports, USPTO guidelines.
  4. Scientific publications and prior art references cited during prosecution.

In conclusion, U.S. Patent RE43711 embodies a strategic mix of chemical innovation and methodological protection, fitting into a complex patent landscape. Its scope and claims are reflective of a robust approach to securing therapeutic molecule rights, although continuous monitoring and legal vigilance remain essential as the patent's lifecycle progresses.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent RE43711

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Merz INBRIJA levodopa POWDER;INHALATION 209184-001 Dec 21, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free INTERMITTENT TREATMENT OF OFF EPISODES IN PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE TREATED WITH CARBIDOPA/LEVODOPA BY INHALATION OF LEVODOPA POWDER PARTICLES ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent RE43711

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2003218307 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2478980 ⤷  Get Started Free
Cyprus 1118517 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 1531798 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 2630954 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1531798 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 2494962 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.