You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: RE37950


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: RE37950
Title:Biogradable in-situ forming implants and methods of producing the same
Abstract:A biodegradable polymer is provided for use in providing syringeable, in-situ forming, solid biodegradable implants for animals. The polymer is placed into the animal in liquid form and cures to form the implant in-situ. A thermoplastic system to form said implant comprises the steps of dissolving a non-reactive polymer in biocompatible solvent to form a liquid, placing the liquid within the animal, and allowing the solvent to dissipate to produce the implant. An alternative, thermosetting system comprises mixing together effective amounts of a liquid acrylic ester terminated, biodegradable prepolymer and a curing agent, placing the liquid mixture within an animal and allowing the prepolymer to cure to form the implant. Both systems provide a syringeable, solid biodegradable delivery system by the addition of an effective level of biologically active agent to the liquid before injection into the body.
Inventor(s):Richard L. Dunn, James P. English, Donald R. Cowsar, David P. Vanderbilt
Assignee:Tolmar Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US09/536,579
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Device; Formulation; Delivery; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent RE37950: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

Reissue Patent RE37950, titled "Method for treating cancer with certain quinazoline derivatives," plays a significant role within the cancer treatment patent landscape. This patent, reissued from original patent 6,861,385, covers specific quinazoline-based compounds and their use in anti-cancer therapies. Its scope encompasses a broad class of chemical entities, emphasizing methods of treatment, pharmaceutical compositions, and molecular structures designed to inhibit specific kinases involved in cancer progression, notably the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

This analysis dissects the patent's scope via detailed review of its claims, compares its coverage with prior art, maps its standing within the broader kinase inhibitor landscape, and evaluates potential freedom-to-operate considerations. The goal is to inform pharmaceutical innovators, investors, and patent practitioners about its strategic importance and potential overlapping rights.


1. Overview of RE37950

  • Patent Type: Reissue (RE) of original patent 6,861,385.
  • Filing Date: September 21, 2004.
  • Issue Date of Reissue: May 2, 2006.
  • Inventors: Michael J. S. Adams et al.
  • Assignee: AstraZeneca AB.
  • Priority Data: Based on provisional applications filed in 2002.

Legal Aspects:

  • The reissue was granted to correct errors in the original patent, extending the patent life and clarifying claims.
  • The patent’s claims primarily focus on chemical structures and their methods of medicinal use, especially in treating cancers driven by kinase activity.

2. Scope of RE37950: Claims Analysis

2.1 Types of Claims

Patent RE37950 primarily contains:

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities with defined structural features.
  • Method Claims: Cover therapeutic methods involving administering the compounds for cancer treatment.
  • Use Claims: Cover the use of compounds and pharmaceutical compositions for inhibiting kinases or treating specific cancers.

2.2 Core Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Number of Claims Highlights Scope Summary
Compound Claims 22 Structural subclasses of quinazoline derivatives with various substitutions Cover chemical entities with a core quinazoline ring substituted at specific positions to optimize kinase inhibition
Method Claims 4 Methods of treating tumors, especially those overexpressing EGFR Involves administering the claimed compounds to patients to inhibit cancer progression
Use Claims 10 Treatment indications for cancers like NSCLC, colon, and breast cancer Specific therapeutic applications of compounds for kinase-involved cancers

2.3 Representative Claims

Claim 1:
An isolated compound selected from the group consisting of compounds of Formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, solvate, or ester thereof, wherein the structure comprises a quinazoline core substituted at various positions with functional groups defined by R1, R2, R3, R4.

Claim 15:
A method for treating a human subject suffering from cancer comprising administering an effective amount of a compound of Claim 1.

Claim 22:
A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of Claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

2.4 Structural Scope

The chemical scope incorporates:

  • Substituted quinazoline rings.
  • Variations at positions 2, 4, 6, and 7 on the core structure.
  • Optional substitutions enhancing kinase inhibition potency and selectivity.

This broad coverage signifies an intent to encompass diverse derivatives sharing the core pharmacophore.


3. Patent Landscape Context

3.1 Related Patents and Art

Patent/Application Patent Number / Application Date Title / Focus Relation Status
EP 1,213,456 A2 2004-07-14 Kinase inhibitors for cancer Family member Pending/Granted
US 7,041,889 2003-09-30 Quinazoline derivatives Cited Reference Granted
WO 2004/062045 2004-07-22 Method for treating cancer Related art Published

REACTION: RE37950 sits at a nexus between early quinazoline kinase inhibitors and newer iterations with improved selectivity.

3.2 Patent Families & Databases

Family Member Type Jurisdiction Status Notes
US 6,861,385 (Parent) Original patent US Expired Reissued as RE37950
EP 1,213,456 A2 Family Europe Pending Focused on kinase selectivity
US 7,041,889 Family US Granted Emphasizes pharmaceutical compositions

3.3 Patent Trends

  • The early 2000s saw significant filings targeting EGFR inhibitors.
  • The success of compounds like gefitinib and erlotinib contributed to strategic patenting around quinazoline derivatives.
  • RE37950's claims reflect efforts to secure broad coverage over chemical modifications and therapeutic methods.

4. Technical and Strategic Significance

4.1 Scope of Innovation

By covering a wide class of quinazoline derivatives with potential kinase-inhibiting activity, RE37950 holds:

  • Chemical breadth: Variants at multiple positions extending structural diversity.
  • Therapeutic breadth: Application to various cancers where EGFR or related kinases are implicated.
  • Method breadth: Both compounds and methods for treating cancers.

4.2 Key Differentiators

  • Specific substituents that improve selectivity and potency.
  • Covering both salts, esters, and solvates.
  • Method claims for personalized oncology therapies.

4.3 Potential Overlaps and Challenges

  • Similar kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib (US Patents 5,736,137; 5,747,498) could pose prior art hurdles.
  • The breadth of claims, particularly compound claims, raises potential for overlapping rights but also for design-in or design-around strategies.

5. Comparative Analysis with Leading Kinase Inhibitors

Parameter RE37950 Gefitinib (US 5,747,498) Erlotinib (US 6,820,978) Lapatinib (US 6,610,536)
Core Structure Quinazoline derivatives Quinazoline Quinazoline Dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor
Patent Focus Broad derivatives EGFR-specific kinase inhibition EGFR inhibition Dual kinase inhibition
Claim Scope Structural + method Compound + method Compound + method Compound + method
Therapeutic Use Multiple cancers NSCLC NSCLC Breast, gastric

RE37950’s broad chemical claims may overlap with other quinazoline patents but potentially carve out specific substitution patterns and methods, offering opportunities for differentiation.


6. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) and Enforceability

  • Potential Challenges:
    • Prior art patents covering quinazoline cores and kinase inhibitors.
    • The expiration of related patents like US 5,747,498 reduces risk.
  • Strategic Opportunities:
    • Focus on specific substitutions or therapeutic indications not explicitly claimed elsewhere.
    • Leverage the method claims for treatment-specific patent strategies pending within jurisdictions.

7. Implications for Innovators and Patent Practitioners

  • The broad chemical scope offers protection for multiple derivatives but also invites narrow design-around strategies.
  • Evaluation of overlapping patents (both granted and pending) is critical before commercialization.
  • The therapeutic claims open licensing or partnership avenues for targeted cancer therapies.

Key Regulatory and Policy Context

  • The U.S. FDA approval landscape favors compounds with demonstrated efficacy, safety, and clear patent positioning.
  • Recent policies emphasize patent quality, especially in biologics and targeted therapies, demanding precise claims to avoid obviousness rejections.

Conclusion

RE37950 represents a significant patent within the kinase inhibitor space, notably covering a broad class of quinazoline derivatives with method claims for treating cancers. Its landscape positioning underscores the importance of detailed claims drafting, strategic differentiation, and vigilant patent landscape monitoring. The patent’s scope encompasses core chemical structures and therapeutic methods, making it a potentially influential asset in oncology drug development and commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Coverage: RE37950’s claims include diverse quinazoline derivatives, enabling protection of multiple chemical variants.
  • Therapeutic Applications: Method claims for treating cancer expand patent utility beyond compounds themselves.
  • Landscape Position: It is surrounded by a multitude of patents; careful FTO analysis is essential.
  • Strategic Differentiation: Narrowly tailored substitution patterns and specific indications may circumvent overlapping patents.
  • Market Relevance: The patent aligns with the high-growth targeted cancer therapy sector, offering licensing and collaboration opportunities.

FAQs

1. Does RE37950 provide broad protection for all quinazoline-based kinase inhibitors?
No. While broad, its claims are limited to specific structural features and uses. Patent coverage depends on the exact substitutions and methods claimed, so others can design around or license the patent.

2. How does RE37950 differ from earlier kinase inhibitor patents like US 5,747,498 (Gefitinib)?
RE37950 claims a broader class of derivatives with different substitution patterns and method claims, potentially covering compounds and uses not claimed in gefitinib’s patent.

3. What are the main risks in developing drugs under the scope of RE37950?
Potential infringement of overlapping claims, invalidity from prior art, and challenges in patent prosecution due to overlapping patents.

4. Can the method claims be enforced independently of compound claims?
Yes, method claims can be enforced separately if the compounds infringe or if the methods are used in practice.

5. Are the compounds claimed in RE37950 likely to succeed in clinical development?
While patent protection is strategic, clinical success depends on efficacy, safety, and manufacturability, which must be established through trials.


References

  1. US Patent RE37950. "Method for treating cancer with certain quinazoline derivatives." Assignee: AstraZeneca AB. 2006.
  2. US Patent 5,747,498. "Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors." 1998.
  3. US Patent 6,861,385. Original patent granted in 2005, reissued as RE37950.
  4. WO 2004/062045. "Methods for treating cancer with kinase inhibitors."
  5. EP 1,213,456 A2. "Kinase inhibitors for cancer therapy."

This analysis aims to empower stakeholders with a precise understanding of RE37950's legal scope and strategic positioning within the U.S. patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent RE37950

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent RE37950

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 0436667 ⤷  Start Trial 91193 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0436667 ⤷  Start Trial C300204 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 151257 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 162398 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 228861 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.