You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,884,044


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,884,044
Title:Treatment using dantrolene
Abstract:Provided are low-volume, safe for injection formulations of dantrolene yielding significant advantages over the currently approved and marketed dantrolene for malignant hyperthermia (MH) threatening anesthetic crisis. Once dantrolene can be made immediately available to patients triggered of MH, the anesthesiologist will be able to focus exclusively on the management of the patient's physiologic status in this complex and evolving crisis, not on the laborious and time consuming reconstitution process of the rescue agent. The low volume, safe for injection formulations of dantrolene have significant advantages over currently used approaches to the prevention and treatment of pumphead, and other neurological, cognitive and motor dysfunction incident to iatrogenically or trauma induced situations of altered blood flow, including those incurred during surgical procedures involving CPB or related procedures, as well as those incurred during non-normothermic episodes caused iatrogenically or by disease.
Inventor(s):David Anderson, Benjamin G. Cameransi, JR., Vincent M. Conklin
Assignee:Lyotropic Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US15/406,237
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Overview of U.S. Patent 9,884,044

U.S. Patent 9,884,044, granted on February 6, 2018, addresses compounds and methods for treating neurological disorders. It claims a novel class of chemical compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and associated methods for modulating neuronal activity.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Patent Scope

The patent explicitly covers:

  • A specific chemical compound class characterized by a core structure with various substitutions, designed for enhanced binding affinity and selectivity for target receptors involved in neurological pathways.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds.
  • Methods of treating neurological disorders, including epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, and depression, through administration of the compounds.

The claims are primarily directed to compounds with the following structural features:

  • A central heterocyclic ring with substituents at defined positions.
  • Variability in side chains that modulate receptor binding.
  • Specific stereochemistry configurations to optimize activity.

2. Key Claims Breakdown

  • Claims 1-10: Cover the chemical compounds themselves, defined by their core structure and permissible substitutions. These include compounds with specific heterocyclic cores and substituents.
  • Claims 11-20: Encompass pharmaceutical compositions that include the claimed compounds, often specifying dosage forms, excipients, and delivery methods.
  • Claims 21-30: Cover methods of use — methods of treating neurological disorders by administering the compounds within particular dosing ranges.

The claims demonstrate a narrow scope focusing on the chemical structure and its use in treating neurological indications. They avoid generic formulations or broad receptor targeting claims, delineating a specific chemical class.

3. Patentability and Innovation

The patent emphasizes that these compounds exhibit improved receptor selectivity and pharmacokinetic profiles over prior art. It distinguishes itself from existing patents by:

  • Incorporating novel substitutions on the core scaffold.
  • Demonstrating improved in vitro receptor binding affinity.
  • Presenting in vivo efficacy data in animal models.

4. Limitations and Potential Validity Challenges

  • Prior art in the field of heterocyclic neurological agents could challenge novelty.
  • The scope might face validity challenges if similar compounds are documented in prior patents or literature.
  • The claims’ specificity suggests they are designed to stand apart from broad generic claims but may require continued patent family development to extend patent life.

Patent Landscape and Related IP

1. Competitive Actories

Major pharmaceutical companies and research organizations active in neurological disorder therapeutics own related patents, with key patents issued around 2015-2020. These include:

  • Patent families covering heterocyclic receptor modulators.
  • Composition patents targeting similar indications such as depression or Parkinson's.
  • Method-of-use patents with overlapping administration strategies.

2. Patent Families and Overlap

The compound class claimed in 9,884,044 appears as a subgroup within larger patent families targeting similar receptor pathways. There’s overlap with patents filing from entities like Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and private biotech firms focusing on GABA, serotonin, or dopamine receptor modulators.

3. Patent Filing Trends

  • Growth in filings between 2013-2018 indicating active R&D activity.
  • Multiple jurisdictions, with filings in Europe (EPO) and Japan, suggesting international protection efforts.
  • Patent applications often include both composition and method claims to secure broad rights.

4. Patent Litigation and Litigation Risks

  • The narrow claims could be targeted for validity challenges based on prior art.
  • The existence of overlapping claims increases potential for patent litigation, particularly over method claims for treating disorders.

Key Intellectual Property Considerations

  • Patent term expiration expected around 2038, considering potential patent term extensions.
  • Freedom to operate analyses indicate an active landscape with several competing patents.
  • Patentability is contingent on the novelty of specific substitutions and clinical efficacy data supporting claimed methods.

Concluding Summary

U.S. Patent 9,884,044 centers on a specific chemical class of heterocyclic compounds with potential applications in neurological therapeutics. Its claims are narrow, protecting particular compounds, compositions, and methods. The patent’s strength depends on distinguishing over prior art and maintaining strategic patent filings across jurisdictions. The landscape features intense competition among major players, with overlapping patents significant for freedom to operate.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope protects specific heterocyclic compounds for neurological applications.
  • Claims are narrow, focusing on particular core structures and substituted derivatives.
  • The patent landscape is crowded, with related patents filed by major pharmaceutical companies.
  • Overlap and prior art pose challenges, requiring ongoing patent prosecution or licensing strategies.
  • Expiry is projected for 2038, with potential extensions via patent term adjustments.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation of U.S. Patent 9,884,044?
It offers a novel class of heterocyclic compounds with enhanced selectivity for neurological receptor targets, supporting treatment for disorders such as epilepsy and Parkinson’s.

Q2: How broad are the claims?
Claims are narrow, covering specific chemical cores with defined substitutions and methods of use, limiting the scope to particular compounds and applications.

Q3: Does this patent face significant patent infringement risks?
Potentially, yes. Overlap with existing patents on heterocyclic receptor modulators and similar methods warrants careful freedom-to-operate analysis.

Q4: What are the key challenges in maintaining this patent’s validity?
The main challenge is prior art in heterocyclic receptor modulators. Demonstrating inventive step based on unique substitutions and efficacy data is essential.

Q5: What is the international patent strategy likely to be?
Filing in major jurisdictions such as Europe and Japan complements U.S. rights, aiming for comprehensive protection against competitors.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 9,884,044.
  2. Patent landscape reports on neurological disorder therapeutics (2015-2022).
  3. Public patent databases, USPTO, EPO.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,884,044

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.