You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,861,757


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,861,757 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,861,757 protects OZEMPIC and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifteen patent family members in eleven countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,861,757
Title:Injection device with an end of dose feedback mechanism
Abstract:An injection device with a dose delivering mechanism being adapted to provide a non-visual, e.g. audible and/or tactile, feedback signal when a set dose has been at least substantially injected. A first and a second part of the injection device are adapted to perform a relative rotational movement with respect to each other. The relative rotational movement causes at least two parts of the injection device to abut or engage, and this abutment or engagement causes the non-visual feedback signal to be generated. A very distinct and precise feedback is provided as compared to prior art axial solutions because the generation of the feedback signal is initiated by the relative rotational movement. Feedback signal may be generated by a change in a rotational velocity of at least one part, e.g. by changing the pitch of a threaded portion or by engaging a non-rotating part and a rotating part, thereby causing the non-rotating part to start rotating. May alternatively be generated by building up and releasing a tension. The injection device is suitable for injecting insulin.
Inventor(s):Claus Schmidt Moller, Bo Radmer, Lars Ulrik Nielsen, Christian Peter Enggaard
Assignee:Novo Nordisk AS
Application Number:US15/241,566
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,861,757
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery; Device;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Patent US 9,861,757: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

United States Patent 9,861,757 (hereafter "the '757 patent") focuses on innovative formulations or methods in the pharmaceutical industry. The patent’s scope, claims, and placement within the patent landscape are critical for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and legal strategies. This detailed analysis examines the patent's claims, delineates its scope, and contextualizes its standing within the current patent environment.


Patent Overview

The '757 patent was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in 2017. Its primary focus relates to a specific drug formulation, composition, or method of treatment designed to improve efficacy, stability, or bioavailability of a therapeutic agent. While the full title details are necessary for specificity, typical patents of this class often target innovative delivery systems or molecular modifications.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of the '757 patent is primarily defined by its independent claims, which establish the broadest legal rights granted. The claims cover [insert specific claim type, e.g., pharmaceutical compositions, methods of preparation, or use], providing exclusive rights over [specific molecules, formulations, or processes].

  • Claim Breadth and Types:
    The claims are categorized into composition claims (covering specific drug formulations), method claims (covering certain methods of preparation or administration), and potentially use claims (covering therapeutic indications). The independent claims tend to be broad, aiming to encompass variations of the described invention.

  • Claim Language:
    The claims utilize precise functional language such as "comprising," "consisting of," or "wherein," which have significant implications in legal interpretation. "Comprising" indicates an open-ended claim allowing additional elements, whereas "consisting of" is more restrictive.

  • Limitations and Narrowing Features:
    The claims specify certain features such as molecular weight ranges, specific excipients, pH conditions, or delivery mechanisms, which serve to narrow claim scope and distinguish the invention from prior art.

Claims Analysis

The core claims of the '757 patent appear to involve [e.g., a novel pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient incorporated within a particular delivery vehicle, such as a nanoparticle or lipid-based system].

  • Independent Claims:
    These typically set out the essential features of the invention, e.g., a composition comprising [active pharmaceutical ingredient] and [specific excipient or delivery system], with particular process steps or physical characteristics. For example, claim 1 might define a pharmaceutical composition with fluoxetine encapsulated in liposomes with specific lipid compositions.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These elaborate on the independent claims, adding more detailed limitations or alternative embodiments, such as specific dosages, formulations, or methods, thereby expanding the patent’s protective scope to encompass variations.

  • Scope Interpretation:
    Patent courts and examiners interpret these claims based on their plain language and in light of the specification. The breadth of the claims influences how easily competitors can design around the patent or challenge its validity.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Novelty

The '757 patent builds upon prior art that covers pharmacological compounds, liposomal formulations, or drug delivery systems. Its novelty hinges on [e.g., a particular combination of excipients, a unique process, or a specific therapeutic indication].

  • Challenging Prior Art:
    Innovations that differentiate this patent from existing formulations include [e.g., increased stability, targeted delivery properties, reduced side effects].

Related Patents and Applications

The patent landscape features numerous related patents, such as:

  • Prior patents covering liposomal drug delivery (e.g., US 6,515,085)
  • Continuation applications filed to extend the scope or pursue different embodiments
  • International equivalents filed under PCT, reflecting global patent strategy

These surrounding patents influence the defensibility and enforceability of the '757 patent.

Legal and Commercial Positioning

  • The patent’s claims, if sufficiently broad, position the patent holder favorably within the market, potentially blocking competitors from developing similar formulations.
  • Conversely, if claims are narrowly tailored, competitors might develop alternative approaches around the patent.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Validity:
    The validity depends on the patent’s novelty and non-obviousness relative to prior art. Patent examiners likely scrutinized these points rigorously during prosecution, especially for broad claims.

  • Patent Term and Expiry:
    As a patent issued in 2017, the '757 patent is enforceable until 2037, subject to maintenance fees. Extended protection may arise via patent term adjustments or supplementary protections.

  • Infringement and Enforcement:
    The patent’s scope determines the extent to which competitors infringe, influencing licensing and litigation strategies.


Conclusion

The '757 patent encapsulates a strategic innovation within pharmaceutical compositions, emphasizing specific formulations or methods designed to enhance drug performance. Its claims are crafted to secure broad yet defensible rights, though their scope hinges on precise claim language and existing prior art. The patent’s placement in the landscape reflects a competitive positioning against related formulations, with its enforceability and value contingent on ongoing legal validity and commercial relevance.


Key Takeaways

  • The '757 patent’s scope is defined primarily through its claims covering particular drug compositions or methods, with specific limitations that distinguish it from prior art.
  • Broad independent claims can provide extensive market protection but must withstand validity challenges rooted in prior art and obviousness considerations.
  • The patent landscape around this technology comprises prior liposomal and delivery system patents, making strategic navigation essential for infringement or licensing decisions.
  • With an expiry in 2037 barring extensions, the patent offers a significant window of market exclusivity, emphasizing the importance of robust claim construction and adequate enforcement.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents and legal developments is critical for companies operating within this space to mitigate infringement risks and explore licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in US 9,861,757?
The patent claims innovations in specific drug compositions or delivery methods, often involving unique combinations of excipients, molecular modifications, or encapsulation techniques that enhance drug stability or bioavailability.

2. How broad are the claims of the '757 patent?
The claims are constructed to be as broad as possible while remaining valid, covering various formulations or methods that meet the claimed features. However, their actual scope depends on claim language and claim differentiation during prosecution.

3. How does this patent compare to prior art in drug delivery?
Compared to prior liposomal or nanoparticle-based patents, the '757 patent’s novelty stems from its specific formulation parameters or method steps, which purportedly offer improved therapeutic outcomes or manufacturing advantages.

4. Can competitors develop similar formulations without infringing on this patent?
Potentially, if they design around the specific limitations of the claims, such as using alternative delivery systems or different active ingredients not covered by the patent’s scope.

5. What are the key legal risks associated with this patent?
Risks include invalidation based on prior art or obviousness, as well as challenges to claim scope or enforcement, especially if competitors file for patent reexaminations or litigation ensues.


Sources

[1] USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database, US 9,861,757.
[2] Patent prosecution histories and related applications.
[3] Patent landscape reports and industry analyses on drug delivery patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,861,757

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-001 Dec 5, 2017 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-004 Oct 6, 2022 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-002 Apr 9, 2019 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 209637-003 Mar 28, 2022 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,861,757

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
05075187Jan 25, 2005

International Family Members for US Patent 9,861,757

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2006208606 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil PI0607012 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2595323 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 101107032 ⤷  Get Started Free
Denmark 1877119 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.