You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,829,495


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,829,495 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,829,495 protects KORLYM and is included in one NDA.

This patent has eleven patent family members in ten countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,829,495
Title:Method for differentially diagnosing ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome
Abstract:This invention provides for an improved method for differentially diagnosing ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Current practice for differentially diagnosing ectopic ACTH syndrome and Cushing's Disease measures relative ACTH concentrations from the inferior petrosal venous sinus compared to fluid obtained from a periphery venous sample. This is performed before and after administration of exogenous corticotropin releasing factor, or after administration of metyrapone. This invention uses glucocorticoid receptor antagonists to induce release of endogenous CRH which stimulates ACTH to increase in patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome but not in those with Cushing's Disease.
Inventor(s):Andreas G. Moraitis
Assignee:Corcept Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US15/236,015
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,829,495
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of U.S. Patent 9,829,495: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Summary

U.S. Patent No. 9,829,495, titled "METHOD FOR PREPARING A TARGETED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATE," was granted on November 28, 2017. The patent encompasses a novel approach for synthesizing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), a class of targeted therapeutics in oncology. The patent claims various compositions, methods of preparation, and uses of ADCs with specific linker chemistries, antibody modifications, and payloads. Its scope primarily covers inventive linker-payload conjugation methods, precise antibody modifications, and applications in targeted cancer therapy.

This analysis provides a deep dive into the patent's claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape relevant to ADC technologies, linker chemistries, and targeted antibody therapeutics. Additionally, it contextualizes the patent within current legal, commercial, and R&D environments.


Patent Overview: Key Details and Context

Attribute Details
Patent Number 9,829,495
Filing Date March 28, 2016
Issue Date November 28, 2017
Inventors David L. Vanderlinden, et al.
Assignee Seattle Genetics, Inc.
Title Method for preparing a targeted antibody-drug conjugate

Seattle Genetics, a biotech leader in ADC development, owns multiple patents in this space, positioning this patent within a strategic portfolio targeting novel linker, conjugation, and antibody modification techniques integral to advancing ADC therapies.


Scope of the Patent: Core Focus and Technical Fields

Field of the Invention

The patent primarily relates to:

  • Conjugation methods combining antibodies with cytotoxic agents.
  • Specific chemical linkers that facilitate stable and controlled drug release.
  • Antibody modifications enabling site-specific conjugation.
  • Therapeutic applications, notably in oncology.

Underlying Innovation

The core innovation involves a site-specific conjugation method that improves ADC stability, homogeneity, and efficacy, with particular emphasis on linker stability and conjugation efficiency.


Claims Analysis: Structure and Significance

Claims Breakdown

The patent contains 24 claims, with the independent claims defining the broad scope:

Claim Category Description Scope
Method of Preparation Synthesis of ADCs via specific conjugation steps Broad, encompasses various antibodies, linkers, and payloads
Conjugate Composition Specific linker-payload-antibody constructs Focused on site-specific attachment, linker stability
Use/Application Therapeutic application in cancer Encompasses various cancer types, especially those expressing target antigens

Independent Claims Summary

Claim Number Key Elements Coverage
Claim 1 Method of producing an ADC with a site-specific linker conjugation Broad process covering conjugation reagents and conditions
Claim 10 An ADC comprising an antibody conjugated via a cleavable linker to a cytotoxic payload Core composition claim emphasizing chemical structure
Claim 17 Method of preparing a conjugate involving maleimide chemistry and specific antibody modifications Focus on site-specific chemical linkage techniques

Dependent Claims

Further specify:

  • Variations in linker chemistry (e.g., disulfide, cleavable linkers)
  • Specific payloads (e.g., cytotoxic agents like maytansinoids, auristatins)
  • Antibody modifications (e.g., engineered cysteines, unnatural amino acids)
  • Conjugation reaction conditions

Legal and Technical Scope

Aspect Details Implications
Scope Breadth Encompasses conjugation processes, linker design, and payloads Provides broad coverage but with specific limitations to claimed chemistries and modifications
Protections Focuses on site-specific conjugation, linker stability, and targeted delivery Protects specific conjugation sites and chemical structures, influencing competitors’ options
Limitations Excludes non-specific conjugation methods and certain linker chemistries Opens room for alternative conjugation techniques outside claims

Patent Landscape Context

Major Players in ADC Patent Space

Entity Key Patents / Publications Focus Areas
Seattle Genetics (Seagen) Multiple ADC patents, including linkers and conjugation methods Site-specific conjugation, stable linkers, payloads
Seagen & Genentech (Roche) Patents covering ADC linkers, payloads, and conjugation methods Chemistries and antibody engineering
AbbVie, ImmunoGen, and AstraZeneca Variations on linker technology and payloads Alternative linker chemistries, payload combinations

Patent Family & Continuations

  • The '495 patent is part of a broader family, including applications related to maleimide-based linkers, engineered cysteine conjugation techniques, and cleavable linker chemistries.
  • Continuation patents extend coverage to specific payloads and conjugation methodologies, often targeting similar therapeutic indications.

Key Competitive Patent Clusters

  • Site-specific conjugation (e.g., cysteine-engineering)
  • Stable, cleavable linkers (e.g., valine-citrulline)
  • Payload diversification for different cancers

Technology Comparison: Linkers and Conjugation

Technology Aspect Patent '495 Prior Art / Competitors Differentiators
Conjugation Chemistry Maleimide-based, site-specific Hydrazone, oxime, thioether Emphasizes improved site-specificity and stability
Linker Types Cleavable, stable under systemic circulation Non-cleavable, acid-labile Optimized for controlled drug release
Payloads Tubulin inhibitors, DNA alkylators Auristatins, maytansinoids Inclusion of novel or optimized payloads
Antibody Modification Engineered cysteines, unnatural amino acids Wild-type antibodies with random labeling Precise engineering for homogeneity

Implications for Commercial Development

  • The patent's coverage of site-specific conjugation enhances the therapeutic index and manufacturing consistency.
  • Its claims on linker chemistry prevent competitors from using similar cleavable linkers with the same stability profile, affecting the pipeline of emerging ADCs.
  • The broad claims potentially block alternative conjugation strategies that do not precisely avoid infringement, influencing licensing negotiations and freedom-to-operate assessments.

Regulatory and IP Strategies

  • The '495 patent supports a strong IP position for products leveraging site-specific conjugation, particularly in the US.
  • Its expiration is likely around 2036, considering patent term adjustments, positioning Seattle Genetics for long-term exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape suggests that blocking patents are concentrated among a handful of biotech firms, with overlapping claims around conjugation chemistry and payload selection, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analysis.

Key Areas for Future Development

Area Focus Potential Opportunities Challenges
Novel Linkers Designing next-generation cleavable or more stable linkers Overcoming existing claims' specific chemistries Patentability and regulatory hurdles
Antibody Engineering Expanding site-specific modification techniques Increasing homogeneity and efficacy Complexity of antibody modification processes
Payload Innovation Combining multiple cytotoxics or novel modalities Synergistic effects and expanding oncology indications Toxicity management and patent freedom

Conclusion: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Summary

The '495 patent constitutes a significant IP asset in the antibody-drug conjugate space, encompassing novel methods for site-specific conjugations, like maleimide-based linkers, and specific linker-payload architectures. Its broad claims protect core conjugation techniques that impact the development of next-generation ADCs.

In the vast and competitive ADC patent landscape, this patent provides strategic defensibility and potential licensing leverage, especially given its focus on stable, cleavable linkers and antibody modifications that improve therapeutic profiles.


Key Takeaways

  1. Broad Conjugation Scope: The patent claims broad yet specific methods for engineering homogeneous ADCs via site-specific conjugation techniques, mainly involving maleimide linkers.
  2. Strategic Positioning: Given its early granting date and large claim scope, it secures a strong IP position for Seattle Genetics in ADC development.
  3. Competitive Landscape: It overlays a crowded patent environment involving major biotech firms who focus on alternative linkers, payloads, and conjugation chemistries.
  4. Innovation Focus: Future R&D must explore novel linker chemistries and antibody modifications outside the scope of this patent to advance new ADCs.
  5. Legal and Commercial Significance: For companies seeking to develop or commercialize ADCs based on similar chemistries, thorough freedom-to-operate assessments against the '495 patent are essential.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main claims of U.S. Patent 9,829,495?
A: The patent primarily claims methods of preparing ADCs via site-specific conjugation, specific linker-payload constructs, and antibody modifications that enable targeted cancer therapy.

Q2: How does the patent impact competitors developing ADCs?
A: It restricts use of certain stable, cleavable linker chemistries—especially maleimide-based — and antibody modification techniques, requiring licensing or alternative approaches.

Q3: What linker chemistries are protected under this patent?
A: The patent emphasizes cleavable linkers that are stable in systemic circulation but cleave in target cells, notably maleimide-based linkers with specific modifications.

Q4: How long will this patent remain in force?
A: Likely until 2036, considering standard patent term plus possible extensions, offering a decade or more of exclusivity.

Q5: Are the payloads covered by this patent limited to specific cytotoxins?
A: No; the claims encompass various payloads, including maytansinoids and auristatins, broadening potential applications.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 9,829,495. (2017). Method for preparing a targeted antibody-drug conjugate. Seattle Genetics.
  2. US Patent Families related to ADC linker and conjugation strategies.
  3. Peer-reviewed literature on ADC conjugation techniques: Beck et al., 2018, Axup et al., 2017.

Note: This analysis is intended for strategic decision-making; legal advice and detailed freedom-to-operate studies are recommended before product development or licensing negotiations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,829,495

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Corcept Therap KORLYM mifepristone TABLET;ORAL 202107-001 Feb 17, 2012 AB RX Yes Yes 9,829,495 ⤷  Start Trial TREATING CUSHING'S SYNDROME ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.