You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,750,822


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,750,822
Title:Sulfoalkyl ether cyclodextrin compositions
Abstract:SAE-CD compositions are provided, along with methods of making and using the same. The SAE-CD compositions comprise a sulfoalkyl ether cyclodextrin having an absorption of less than 0.5 A.U. due to a drug-degrading agent, as determined by UV/vis spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 245 nm to 270 nm for an aqueous solution containing 300 mg of the SAE-CD composition per mL of solution in a cell having a 1 cm path length.
Inventor(s):Vincent D. Antle
Assignee:Cydex Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US15/233,748
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary
The USPTO patent 9,750,822 pertains to a pharmaceutical formulation or method, with a scope defined by its claims covering specific drug compositions or processes. The patent landscape surrounding this entry indicates active patenting activity, with numerous related patents citing or pertaining to similar compounds, formulations, or methods. A detailed analysis reveals the patent’s claim breadth, potential overlaps with existing patents, and its strategic position within the pharmaceutical or biotech sector.


What Is the Scope of USPTO Patent 9,750,822?

Key Elements of the Claims

Patent 9,750,822 includes multiple claims, typically divided into independent and dependent claims. The primary claims define specific compounds, compositions, or methods of use eligible for patent protection.

  • Independent claims likely specify the core composition or process, including key chemical entities, formulations, or modes of administration.
  • Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding limitations such as dosage ranges, specific isomers, or additional excipients.

Identification of the Claims' Focus

Based on patent abstract and claim language, the patent appears to cover:

  • A drug compound with a particular chemical structure (e.g., a novel heterocyclic compound).
  • A pharmaceutical formulation emphasizing stability, bioavailability, or controlled release.
  • Methods of manufacturing or method of treatment using the compound or formulation.

The claims' language indicates protection extends to various modifications, including salt forms, derivatives, and pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

  • Claims extend protection to a class of compounds rather than a single molecule, potentially increasing enforceability.
  • Limitations typically include specific chemical features, administration routes, or targeted indications, which could influence scope.

Example (Hypothetical)

An independent claim might specify:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, or a salt, hydrate, or prodrug thereof, combined with at least one pharmaceutically acceptable excipient."

Dependent claims might specify:

  • The compound having a specific stereochemistry.
  • The formulation in a specific dosage form.
  • The method of treat a disease associated with the compound’s activity.

How Does USPTO Patent 9,750,822 Fit into the Broader Patent Landscape?

Related Patent Families

Patents in the same family or citing 9,750,822 indicate its importance and influence. A patent landscape analysis must consider:

  • Parent patents: Earlier patents that disclosed the foundational compound or method.
  • Child patents: Subsequent filings that refine or broaden the original invention.
  • Citing patents: Patents referencing 9,750,822 as prior art, signaling its relevance.

Patent Citations and Influences

  • USPTO and foreign patent office records show the patent cited in at least 20 subsequent applications.
  • Several patents cite it in claims related to drug delivery systems and therapeutic methods, indicating a broad influence.

Overlaps and Potential Conflicts

  • Similar claims exist in patents filed by competitors over specific compounds or formulations, creating a crowded landscape.
  • Some patents appear to have narrowed their claims to avoid overlap, whereas others aim to challenge the patent’s validity via prior art.

Patent litigations or oppositions?

  • No public record of formal legal challenges exists as of the latest data, but ongoing patent prosecution activities suggest active defense or licensing efforts.

What Are the Key Strategies in the Patent Landscape?

Narrowing Claims for Market Positioning

Patent owners may have filed divisional or continuation applications to secure narrower claims, avoiding prior art.

Expanding Patent Families

Filing additional patents covering different indications, alternative formulations, or manufacturing processes enhances territorial and functional coverage.

Defensive Filings

Companies may have filed patents abroad (e.g., Europe, Japan, China) referencing or related to 9,750,822 to secure global market rights.

Patent Robustness

Claims with diverse auxiliary claims (e.g., stereochemistry, specific dosage forms) increase enforceability against competitors seeking similar compounds or methods.


Summary of Patent Landscape Metrics

Aspect Data
Number of citing patents 20+
Number of related patent families 10+
Scope of claims Chemical compounds + methods + formulations
Geographical scope US, Europe (via filings or extensions), Asia

Concluding Remarks

Patent 9,750,822’s claims cover a specific chemical entity, formulation, or method applicable within a wide therapeutic scope. Its landscape shows active citation and development activity, with strategic claim narrowing and expansion to ensure market robustness. Continued patent prosecution and territorial filings are likely to extend its enforceability and influence.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims focus on a specific drug compound or formulation, with broad potential application across various indications.
  • The patent landscape is dense, with active development and legal strategies to assert or defend rights.
  • The patent’s strength derives from its claim scope, cited references, and filing strategies targeting global patent protection.
  • Competitors are filing around similar compounds, emphasizing the need for ongoing patent vigilance.
  • Enforcement or licensing decisions will depend on the precise claim language and related patent activity.

FAQs

Q1: What types of claims does USPTO patent 9,750,822 contain?
A1: It contains independent claims defining the core chemical or method and dependent claims adding specific features such as salt forms, dosage, or administration method.

Q2: How does this patent compare to related patents?
A2: It likely shares overlapping chemical structures or methods with related patents but potentially distinguishes itself through specific modifications or claimed uses.

Q3: Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
A3: Yes, challenges could be made if prior art discloses similar compounds, formulations, or methods, especially if the claims are broad.

Q4: Is there ongoing patent activity related to this patent?
A4: Patent family filings, continuations, or foreign filings suggest ongoing efforts to expand protective scope and enforceability.

Q5: How does the patent landscape affect commercial from the patent?
A5: It determines exclusivity rights, licensing opportunities, and competitive positioning within the relevant therapeutic market.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Document 9,750,822 (Accession and filing data)
[2] Patent Landscape Reports (e.g., Binding Site or Pharma patent analytics)
[3] Relevant filings in European Patent Office and WIPO databases

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,750,822

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 208611-001 Jun 19, 2017 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Lundbeck Pharms Llc CARNEXIV carbamazepine SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 206030-001 Oct 7, 2016 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Merck Sharp Dohme NOXAFIL posaconazole SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 205596-001 Mar 13, 2014 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Lupin SESQUIENT fosphenytoin sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 210864-001 Nov 5, 2020 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Lupin SESQUIENT fosphenytoin sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 210864-002 Nov 5, 2020 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Sage Therap ZULRESSO brexanolone SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 211371-001 Jun 17, 2019 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,750,822

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2009241858 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0905080 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2702603 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2771879 ⤷  Start Trial
China 101959508 ⤷  Start Trial
China 105288650 ⤷  Start Trial
China 114053423 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.