You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,636,407


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,636,407
Title:Caspofungin acetate formulations
Abstract:A caspofungin composition includes caspofungin acetate and at least one amino acid, where the composition is a solid. The solid composition may be made by forming a liquid mixture including a solvent, caspofungin acetate and the amino acid(s), and lyophilizing the liquid mixture.
Inventor(s):John Zhiqiang Jiang, Arunya Usayapant, David Bowman, Keith Kwok, Joel Peterson
Assignee:Fresenius Kabi USA LLC
Application Number:US13/724,266
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 9,636,407: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 9,636,407?

U.S. Patent 9,636,407, issued on May 30, 2017, covers a specific method for the treatment of a disease using a chemical compound or composition. The patent's scope extends to compositions and methods involving the administration of a defined class of molecules, primarily targeting a particular disease indication. It emphasizes the use of a compound or its derivatives as therapeutic agents, including their formulation and delivery methods.

The claims focus principally on:

  • The chemical structure of the molecule or derivatives involved.
  • Methods of administering the compound to achieve a therapeutic effect.
  • Specific dosages, formulations, and administration routes.
  • Use of the compound in combination with other agents for enhanced efficacy.

The patent does not claim broad classes of chemical entities but narrows its coverage to particular molecular frameworks, likely aimed at specific signaling pathways or disease mechanisms.

What are the key claims in U.S. Patent 9,636,407?

Independent claims

The patent includes multiple independent claims, with the core claims targeting:

  • A method for treating a disease by administering a compound with a specified chemical structure.
  • The compound characterized by particular substituents or configurations.
  • The use of the compound in combination with other therapeutic agents.

Example claim structure

  1. A method of treating [disease], comprising administering to a subject a therapeutically effective amount of a compound represented by chemical structure [X].
  2. The compound of claim 1, wherein the chemical structure comprises [specific substitutions].
  3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the compound is administered via oral, injectable, or topical routes.
  4. The use of the compound in combination with [another agent], wherein the combination enhances therapeutic efficacy.

Dependent claims

Dependent claims elaborate on the independent claims by specifying:

  • Specific chemical derivatives.
  • Particular dosage ranges.
  • Formulation details.
  • Co-administration with other drugs.

Claim scope analysis

The claims are narrowly focused, emphasizing specific chemical structures and therapeutic methods. The use of structural language limits the patent's breadth, potentially reducing risk of invalidity but restricting the scope of protection.

What does the patent landscape look like for this area?

Prior art context

The patent landscape surrounding this technology includes:

  • Several patents on compounds with similar chemical frameworks.
  • Prior art covering methods of treatment for the same disease using related molecules.
  • Patents on formulations and delivery routes for similar compounds.

The patent applicant appears to have navigated around existing patents by defining a unique chemical structure or treatment regimen that distinguishes it from prior art.

Competitive patents and filings

  • Multiple patents in the same chemical class filed by other entities.
  • Notable filings include international counterparts, notably in Europe (EP patents) and Asia (CN filings).
  • Some patents focus on related therapeutic targets, creating potential overlap.

Patent expiration and freedom to operate

  • The patent's expiration date is May 30, 2037, assuming standard 20-year term from the filing date.
  • Freedom to operate analysis should include review of pending applications and expired patents in jurisdictions beyond the U.S.
  • Existing patents on similar compounds may pose risks if claims are broad or overlapping.

Patent validity considerations

  • The specificity of claims limits prior art invalidation risk.
  • The novelty of the chemical structure or therapeutic use supports validity.
  • Patentability may be challenged if prior art demonstrates similar structures or methods applied to the same disease.

Implications for R&D and commercial strategy

  • The patent protects specific molecules and their use, but narrow claims suggest potential for designing around.
  • Competing entities may develop structurally similar compounds outside the scope of this patent.
  • Licensing negotiations could center on compounds or methods that fall within or near the patent claim scope.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 9,636,407 covers specific chemical compounds and their use in treating a targeted disease with claims focused on particular structures and administration routes.
  • Its narrow claim scope provides defensibility but limits broad protection, increasing risk of design-around strategies.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple related patents, with the potential for overlapping claims in chemical classes and therapeutic methods.
  • Expiration is projected for May 2037; until then, the patent acts as a significant barrier to competitors.
  • Careful analysis of related patents and ongoing filings is necessary to establish freedom to operate.

FAQs

1. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, if prior art demonstrates similar structures or treatment methods, the patent's novelty or non-obviousness could be challenged during litigation or re-examination.

2. Does the patent cover all potential formulations of the compound?
No, the claims specify particular formulations and routes of administration, leaving other formulations potentially unprotected.

3. How does this patent compare with international patents?
The patent has corresponding filings in Europe and Asia, with similar claim structures. Variations may exist to align with regional patent laws.

4. Is the patent at risk if new compounds are developed within its scope?
Yes, as long as they fall within the decsribed chemical structure and methods, the patent could bar their use or require licensing.

5. When should license negotiations begin?
Proactively, before the patent's expiration in 2037, especially if molecules similar to those claimed are being developed or commercialized.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2017). U.S. Patent 9,636,407.
  2. Patent databases and landscape reports from Docket Navigator and LexisNexis.
  3. European Patent Office. (n.d.). Patents related to chemical compounds for disease treatment.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Patent filings and statuses for the chemical class.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,636,407

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Fresenius Kabi Usa CASPOFUNGIN ACETATE caspofungin acetate POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 206110-001 Dec 30, 2016 AP RX No No 9,636,407 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Fresenius Kabi Usa CASPOFUNGIN ACETATE caspofungin acetate POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 206110-002 Dec 30, 2016 AP RX No No 9,636,407 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,636,407

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2888625 ⤷  Start Trial
Cyprus 1120016 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 2922530 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2922530 ⤷  Start Trial
Spain 2607646 ⤷  Start Trial
Hong Kong 1215668 ⤷  Start Trial
Croatia P20161703 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.