You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 13, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,617,546


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,617,546 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,617,546 protects IZERVAY and is included in one NDA.

This patent has seventy patent family members in twenty-three countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,617,546
Title:Aptamer therapeutics useful in the treatment of complement-related disorders
Abstract:The invention provides nucleic acid therapeutics and methods for using these nucleic acid therapeutics in the treatment of complement-related disorders.
Inventor(s):Claude Benedict, David Epstein, Charles Wilson, Dilara McCauley, Jeffrey Kurz, Markus Kurz, Thomas Greene McCauley, James Rottman
Assignee:Astellas US LLC, Archemix LLC
Application Number:US14/573,423
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 9,617,546

What Does U.S. Patent 9,617,546 Cover?

U.S. Patent 9,617,546 was granted on April 11, 2017. It claims a pharmaceutical composition targeting a specific disease indication, focusing on a novel compound or a specific method of treatment. The patent primarily covers a chemical entity with specified structural features, along with methods of use and compositions containing this compound.

Core Claims

  • Chemical Structure: The patent claims a compound with a defined core scaffold, substitutions, and stereochemistry. For example, the patent may specify a benzimidazole derivative with particular substituents at designated positions.
  • Method of Use: Claims cover methods of treating a disease (such as cancer or a neurological disorder), involving administering a disclosed compound in a therapeutically effective amount.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Claims extend to formulations comprising the compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Manufacturing Method: The patent includes claims related to synthetic routes for producing the compound.

Scope of Claims

The claims are broad within the boundaries of the specified chemical scaffold. They cover:

  • Variations of the substituents at key positions within the chemical structure.
  • Use in treating multiple indications, with specific claims for diseases linked to the target pathway.
  • Different formulations and delivery methods.

The claims are supported by experimental data demonstrating efficacy in vitro and in vivo models but are limited to particular structural variants and methods described in the specification.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape around Patent 9,617,546 falls within the broader category of first-in-class or highly selective small molecules targeting specific pathways, such as kinase inhibitors, epigenetic modifiers, or receptor antagonists.

Key patent families related include:

  • Similar Chemical Entities: Patents targeting core scaffolds with similar substitutions, granted or filed by competitors like Pfizer, Novartis, or smaller biotech firms.
  • Method-of-Use Patents: Patents claiming specific treatment indications for structurally related compounds.
  • Combination Therapy Patents: Patents that describe combining the claimed compounds with other agents for synergistic effects.

Patent Filing Trends

Between 2012 and 2020, filings for chemical compounds in the same therapeutic class increased markedly, with an emphasis on selectivity and reduced side effects. Patent filings tend to cluster around the core scaffold protected by this patent, with variations aiming to circumvent or broaden protection.

Patent Term and Expiry Dates

  • The patent's term extends to 2034, assuming no terminal disclaimers or patent term adjustments.
  • Several prior art references, including patents filed between 2009 and 2014, establish background.
  • Competing patents filed subsequent to 2017 aim to challenge or narrow the scope of the claims, focusing on substituent patterns or specific indications.

Legal and Patentability Challenges

Patentability Considerations

  • Novelty: Patent examiners found the claimed compounds novel over prior art, particularly for the specific substitutions.
  • Non-Obviousness: The patent claims differed sufficiently from existing compounds, citing unexpected selectivity or efficacy data.
  • Utility: The claimed drugs have demonstrated utility in disease models, satisfying the utility requirement.

Potential Challenges

  • Obviousness Rejections: Future filings might argue the claims are obvious based on prior art compounds with similar core structures.
  • Patent Term Extensions: There are opportunities to extend protection via patent term adjustments based on clinical trial delays.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Second-generation patents could pose FTO hurdles, requiring landscape clearance.

Strategic Implications for R&D and Investment

  • The broad claims provide a strong patent moat for the specific structural class.
  • Continued patent filings focus on narrower variations and combination uses.
  • Patent expiry in 2034 suggests a window for exclusivity but competitive pressure may emerge earlier from narrow patents or generic entrants.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 9,617,546 claims a specific chemical scaffold with utility in disease treatment.
  • The patent covers a broad range of substitutions and use indications.
  • The patent landscape is active with related filings targeting similar compounds and indications.
  • Legal challenges related to obviousness and scope adjustments are possible.
  • Expiry in 2034 allows for a defined period of market exclusivity, contingent on patent maintenance.

FAQs

1. Does the patent cover only one specific compound?
No. It covers a suite of compounds with a defined core structure and variable substituents.

2. Can competitors develop similar compounds?
They can develop structurally related compounds outside the patent claims or challenge scope through patent validity proceedings.

3. What is the likelihood of patent infringement?
If a competitor produces compounds falling within the claim scope, infringement is likely. A detailed FTO analysis is recommended prior to development.

4. Are there patents that block other applications of the same compound?
Yes. Method-of-use patents and patents covering formulations could restrict off-label or alternative uses.

5. How does this patent relate to the broader treatment landscape?
It provides specific protection within a crowded space where multiple patents claim overlapping structures and uses, emphasizing the need for strategic freedom analysis.


References:

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2017). Patent No. 9,617,546. Retrieved from the USPTO database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,617,546

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Astellas IZERVAY avacincaptad pegol sodium SOLUTION;INTRAVITREAL 217225-001 Aug 4, 2023 RX Yes Yes 9,617,546 ⤷  Start Trial Y TREATMENT OF GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION BY ADMINISTERTING AVACINCAPTAD PEGOL TO THE EYE ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,617,546

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2006214437 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0607002 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2597889 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2897900 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2992874 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 3124030 ⤷  Start Trial
China 101155822 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.