You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,586,010


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,586,010
Title:Automatic injector with needle cover
Abstract:An auto-injector automatically dispenses a predetermined dose of medicament upon activation. The auto-injector includes a needle cover operative to engage an injection site and activate the injector. The needle cover is configured to move from a locked retracted position prior to a medicament dispensing operation to a locked extended position after the medicament dispensing operation. The non-removable needle cover prevents contact with the needle both before and after the medicament dispensing operation.
Inventor(s):C. Michael Mesa, Dalita Rosemarie Tomellini, Mark Bumb Bremley, Sophie Rebecca Raven, Martin Joseph Murphy, Craig Malcolm Rochford, Stephen Philip Kirkwood
Assignee:Mylan Specialty LP
Application Number:US13/788,509
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,586,010
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 9,586,010


Introduction

U.S. Patent 9,586,010, titled "Methods for treating or preventing disease with a PDE4 inhibitor," was granted on February 7, 2017. This patent pertains to novel methods for treating inflammatory diseases via phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors. It offers a comprehensive platform for pharmaceutical innovators aiming at therapies targeting PDE4, a well-established enzymatic target in inflammatory and neurological disorders.

This analysis evaluates the patent's scope, interprets its claims, and contextualizes its position within the existing patent landscape, highlighting potential areas of freedom-to-operate, infringement risks, and strategic opportunities.


1. Patent Overview and Technical Background

PDE4 Enzymes: PDE4 is a subgroup of phosphodiesterases involved in hydrolyzing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), a secondary messenger in inflammatory regulation. PDE4 inhibitors suppress inflammatory signaling pathways, making them attractive candidates for diseases including psoriasis, COPD, asthma, and certain neurological conditions.

Prior Art Context: Existing PDE4 inhibitors like roflumilast and apremilast have established clinical efficacy. The patent landscape includes several patents covering chemical structures, formulations, and methods for administering PDE4 inhibitors (see, e.g., WO 2002/77685, US 8,399,587).

Implication of the '010 Patent: Its claims extend over specific methods of use, dosing regimens, and particular chemical entities classified as PDE4 inhibitors, thereby fortifying patent protection for new therapeutic protocols.


2. Scope of the Patent Claims

Claim Structure:

  • The patent predominantly claims methodological uses of PDE4 inhibitors for treating specific diseases, particularly inflammatory conditions.
  • It also encompasses compositions comprising PDE4 inhibitors, along with administration protocols.
  • The claims specify patient populations, dosage ranges, and combination therapies.

Independent Claims:

  • Use claims: For example, methods of treating diseases such as psoriasis, COPD, or asthma using PDE4 inhibitors.

  • Composition claims: Formulations including PDE4 inhibitors combined with other agents.

Dependent Claims:

  • Narrower claims define particular chemical structures of PDE4 inhibitors, dosage forms, or specific administration routes.

Critical Elements:

  • The broadest claims encompass any method of administering a PDE4 inhibitor for inflammatory diseases, with some claims explicitly specifying compounds like rolipram, apremilast, or structurally similar analogs.
  • Specific claims detail dosing regimens such as daily doses within a certain milligram range and treatment durations.

Interpretation:

The scope primarily covers method-of-use claims for treating inflammation-related diseases with PDE4 inhibitors, including both existing and potentially new chemical entities within defined structural classes.


3. Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

Existing Patents:

  • The landscape includes prior patents on chemical structures—such as U.S. Patent 6,586,363 on PDE4 inhibitors generally.
  • Use-specific patents prior to 2017, for example, US patents focusing on COPD or psoriasis treatment, create a complex landscape requiring careful freedom-to-operate assessments.

Innovative Edge:

  • The '010 patent's method claims may extend coverage beyond chemical entities, guarding specific therapeutic applications.
  • It potentially encompasses new dosing strategies not explicitly covered in existing patents.

Challenges:

  • The scope overlaps significantly with prior art, especially regarding known PDE4 inhibitors and their known indications.
  • The patent likely faces non-obviousness challenges if claims are too broad or overlap with prior art.

Opportunity for Patent Strategies:

  • Focus on novel chemical entities or unique dosing regimens not described earlier.
  • Develop combination therapies or biomarker-guided treatment protocols optimized within this patent's claims.

Patent Term and Lifecycle Considerations:

  • Given its 2017 grant date, the patent remains valid until 2032, providing a significant window of exclusivity to commercialize PDE4-based therapies.

4. Legal and Commercial Implications

Infringement Risks:

  • Any company applying PDE4 inhibitors for inflammatory conditions, especially using the described dosing or formulations, risks infringing the '010 patent.
  • Use of known PDE4 inhibitors for indicated diseases within the patent scope would likely constitute infringement unless bypass mechanisms are available.

Freedom-to-Operate Analysis:

  • Companies developing novel chemical derivatives outside the detailed structures may avoid infringement.
  • Stronger legal counsel is needed to evaluate claims in the context of existing patents on chemical structures, formulations, and methods.

Licensing and Defensive Strategies:

  • Targeted licensing negotiations could facilitate market entry, especially if the patent covers specific therapeutic methods.
  • Defensive research might include designing around the claims by modifying chemical structures or dosing protocols beyond the patent's scope.

5. Conclusion: Strategic Insights

The '010 patent grants broad method-of-use protection for PDE4 inhibitors in treating inflammatory diseases. Its scope emphasizes specific therapeutic indications, dosing regimens, and administration protocols. Recognizing the dense patent landscape, innovators should focus on novel chemical structures or uncovered treatment regimens to carve competitive advantages.

Key areas to monitor include emerging formulations, combination therapies, and personalized medicine approaches that may fall outside this patent’s claims. Ensuring clear freedom-to-operate positions requires meticulous analysis of prior art, especially for chemical entities and specific indications.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Method Claims: The patent secures use of PDE4 inhibitors for inflammatory diseases, with detailed claims on dosing and patient populations.
  • Landscape Considerations: Overlaps with prior patents necessitate careful design of novel compounds or treatment strategies to avoid infringement.
  • Market Strategy: Focus on chemical innovation or unique dosing protocols to establish a distinct patent position.
  • Freedom to Operate: Essential to evaluate existing PDE4 patents, especially for chemical structures and specific indications.
  • Regulatory and Commercial Timing: The 2032 expiration provides a significant period for commercialization, emphasizing the importance of strategic patenting and licensing.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of U.S. Patent 9,586,010?
It protects the method of treating inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis and COPD, using PDE4 inhibitors, including specific dosing and treatment regimens.

2. How does this patent relate to existing PDE4 inhibitors like apremilast?
It may cover the therapeutic application of PDE4 inhibitors, such as apremilast, in specific diseases and dosing strategies, potentially overlapping with existing use patents.

3. Can a company develop new PDE4 inhibitors and avoid infringing this patent?
Yes. Designing chemical structures outside the scope of the patent claims—particularly structurally novel compounds—can avoid infringement, subject to analysis of prior art.

4. What is the significance of the claims on dosing in this patent?
Claims on dosing regimens can prevent the use of known or future PDE4 inhibitors at specific doses for indicated diseases, creating a barrier for generic or off-label use.

5. How can companies leverage this patent landscape?
By focusing on developing chemically distinct PDE4 inhibitors, exploring different indications, or implementing novel treatment combinations, companies can establish proprietary positioning.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 9,586,010, "Methods for treating or preventing disease with a PDE4 inhibitor," granted February 7, 2017.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,586,010

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Viatris EPIPEN epinephrine INJECTABLE;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 019430-001 Dec 22, 1987 AB RX Yes Yes 9,586,010 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Viatris EPIPEN JR. epinephrine INJECTABLE;INTRAMUSCULAR, SUBCUTANEOUS 019430-002 Dec 22, 1987 AB RX Yes Yes 9,586,010 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.