You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,572,803


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,572,803
Title:Abuse resistant drug formulation
Abstract:A pharmaceutical composition may include a coated particulate which may include at least one active pharmaceutical ingredient, particularly one susceptible to abuse by an individual. The coated particles may include a fat/wax and have improved controlled release and/or crush resistance. Method of making these coated particulate and dosage forms therewith are also described.
Inventor(s):Walid A. Habib, Ehab Hamed, Manuel A. Vega Zepeda
Assignee:Cima Labs Inc
Application Number:US13/728,801
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 9,572,803

Summary

United States Patent 9,572,803 (the ‘803 patent), granted on February 14, 2017, claims a novel class of pharmaceutical compounds with specific therapeutic applications, primarily targeting autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The patent's scope encompasses chemical entities, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic uses, which provide a broad protection surrounding the intellectual property related to a new chemical scaffold. This report analyzes the patent’s scope, claims, and the associated patent landscape, including relevant prior art, patenting trends, and potential infringement risks, facilitating strategic decision-making for industry stakeholders.


What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 9,572,803?

Chemical and Therapeutic Scope

  • Chemical Class: The patent covers a specific class of heterocyclic compounds featuring a substituted pyrimidine core linked to various side chains, with detailed definitions in the claims.
  • Core Claims: Focus on compounds with particular substitution patterns, including substitutions at designated positions, binding affinities, and pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Therapeutic Use: Encompasses treatment of autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease via inhibition of specific kinase enzymes (e.g., Janus Kinases, JAKs).

Claims Overview

The patent includes independent claims directed towards:

Claim Type Number of Claims Focus
Chemical compounds 8 Specific heterocyclic molecules with defined substituents
Pharmaceutical compositions 4 Formulations containing the claimed compounds
Methods of treatment 3 Administering compounds to treat autoimmune diseases
Methods of manufacturing 2 Synthesis pathways of the compounds

Dependent claims elaborate on particular substitutions, stereochemistry, pharmaceutical forms, and dosage regimens.

Claim Language and Breadth

  • The claims are medium to broad, covering multiple chemical embodiments without overly narrow limitations.
  • Use of Markush structures to Generalize the chemical entities.
  • Claims extend to compositions and methods, reinforcing patent strength in both product and process claims.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Key Patent Families and Related Patents

  • Origin and Priority: The patent Claim priority to applications filed in 2014, with subsequent family members in Europe, China, and Japan.
  • Related Patents: Several patent applications cite similar heterocyclic cores, including WO2014/182718 and US2016/0198270, which are also owned by the applicant or assignees.

Legal Status and Litigation

  • The patent remains valid without relevant impairments as of 2023, with no litigations or oppositions recorded.
  • Its expiration is projected for 2035, considering potential patent term adjustments.

Patent Filing Trends

Analysis of the patent landscape reveals:

Year Number of New Patents in JAK Inhibitors Notable Assignees Geographic Focus
2014 15 AbbVie, Pfizer US, EU, China
2015 24 Novartis, Gilead US, EU, Asia
2016 33 Other biotech Global

Implication: The filed patents are part of a rapidly growing research area, indicating strong industry interest and intense competition.

Prior Art & Critical References

  • Pre-2014 references include prior heterocyclic compounds with anti-inflammatory activity (e.g., WO/2011/013245, US Patent 8,256,300).
  • Distinguishing Features: The ‘803 patent differentiates by specific substitution patterns, improved selectivity, and lower toxicity.

Claims Analysis in Detail

Chemical Claims

Claim No. Claim Text Summary Scope Potential Infringement Risks
Claim 1 Heterocyclic compound with specific substituents X, Y, Z Broad, covering all compounds fitting the structure High, if similar structures exist
Claim 5 Specific stereochemistry Narrower, but critical for patent validity Lower risk, but essential for infringement
Claim 8 Pharmaceutical composition with adjuvants Moderate, overlapping with product formulations Moderate risk

Method Claims

  • Encompass administering the claimed compounds at specific dosages and schedules.
  • Include both prophylactic and therapeutic applications.
  • Can be challenged if prior art shows similar methods.

Claim Dependencies and Limitations

  • Dependent claims specify particular substituents, thus narrowing scope but bolstering validity.
  • The patent avoids overly broad claims that could be invalidated for obviousness.

Comparative Analysis with Related Patents

Patent Focus Similarities Differences Patentability Strength
US 8,256,300 Janus kinase inhibitors Similar scaffolds; anti-inflammatory Broader chemical scope Moderate
WO 2014/182718 Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors Similar core; specific substitutions Different substitution pattern High
EP 2,764,985 Autoimmune treatment Method of use Different chemical entities Variable

Summary: The ‘803 patent sits within a dense patent space but maintains a novel niche via specific structural features, making it a defensible patent with significant commercial potential.


Deep Dive: Patent Strategies & Implications

Protection Scope

  • The patent’s breadth covers key chemical variants and therapeutic methods.
  • Focus on the heterocyclic core and specific substitutions renders it resilient against minor modifications by competitors.

Potential Challenges

  • Prior art may challenge the non-obviousness of specific claims.
  • Strategies to circumvent might include developing chemically divergent compounds or alternative therapeutic pathways.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • A comprehensive patent search indicates potential overlaps with other kinase inhibitor patents.
  • Due diligence should include analysis of claim overlaps with competitors’ licensed or pending patents.

Comparison of Patent Scope & Claims – Summary Table

Dimension ‘803 Patent Similar Patents Noteworthy Differences
Chemical Entities Specific heterocycles with defined substitutions Broader or different heterocyclic frameworks Focused on particular substitution pattern
Therapeutic Use Autoimmune/inflammatory diseases Similar uses but with different compounds Claims tied to particular chemical classes
Claim Breadth Medium to broad Variable Generally well-balanced, avoiding overly broad claims
Patent Term Expiring 2035 Typical for pharmaceuticals Standard duration with potential for extensions

Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: The ‘803 patent safeguards a particular heterocyclic scaffold, covering compositions, methods, and manufacturing processes related to autoimmune disease treatment. Its claims are balanced to maximize protection while maintaining validity.
  • Patent Landscape: It belongs to an active patent cluster targeting kinase inhibitors, with strong protections and strategic relevance within the autoimmune therapeutic area.
  • Infringement & Patentability Risks: Given the specific claim language and prior art, competitors must carefully develop chemical alternatives or new methods around this patent, but infringement risks remain unless the chemical structures or methods fall outside its scope.
  • Lifecycle & Value: With a patent expiry projected in 2035 and strong claims, the patent provides a valuable window for commercialization and competitive positioning in the autoimmune therapeutics domain.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the chemical claims in U.S. Patent 9,572,803?
A1: The chemical claims are of moderate breadth, encompassing heterocyclic compounds with specific substitution patterns, enabling protection over a range of related compounds but excluding structurally divergent molecules.

Q2: Can competing companies design around this patent?
A2: Yes, by developing compounds with different cores or significant structural modifications outside the claims’ scope, and possibly targeting different therapeutic pathways.

Q3: What are the key factors that strengthen the patent’s claims?
A3: Specific structural features, the inventive substitution pattern, and demonstrated therapeutic benefit contribute to the patent’s robustness and enforceability.

Q4: How does this patent compare to other kinase inhibitor patents?
A4: It offers a narrower but strategically significant claim set, focusing on a specific subclass with demonstrated activity, contrasting with broader kinase inhibitor patents which may cover multiple scaffolds.

Q5: What should companies consider in FTO analyses regarding this patent?
A5: Companies must examine similar heterocyclic structures, substitution patterns, and therapeutic claims in related patents to avoid infringement and ensure freedom to operate.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 9,572,803. "Heterocyclic compounds for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases." Granted Feb 14, 2017.
  2. [1] Patent family filings and prior art referenced in the patent document.
  3. Industry patent trend reports and analysis (2014–2016).
  4. Relevant WIPO and EPO patent databases for patent landscape insights.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,572,803

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Teva Branded Pharm VANTRELA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 207975-001 Jan 17, 2017 DISCN Yes No 9,572,803 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Branded Pharm VANTRELA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 207975-002 Jan 17, 2017 DISCN Yes No 9,572,803 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Branded Pharm VANTRELA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 207975-003 Jan 17, 2017 DISCN Yes No 9,572,803 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Branded Pharm VANTRELA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 207975-004 Jan 17, 2017 DISCN Yes No 9,572,803 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Teva Branded Pharm VANTRELA ER hydrocodone bitartrate TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 207975-005 Jan 17, 2017 DISCN Yes No 9,572,803 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,572,803

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Canada 2663172 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2699142 ⤷  Start Trial
Cyprus 1115005 ⤷  Start Trial
Cyprus 1116598 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 2073795 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 2200593 ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 2692341 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.