You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,549,923


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,549,923 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,549,923 protects APADAZ and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-five patent family members in twenty countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,549,923
Title:Benzoic acid, benzoic acid derivatives and heteroaryl carboxylic acid conjugates of hydrocodone, prodrugs, methods of making and uses thereof
Abstract:The presently described technology provides compositions comprising aryl carboxylic acids chemically conjugated to hydrocodone (morphinan-6-one, 4,5-alpha-epoxy-3-methoxy-17-methyl) to form novel prodrugs/compositions of hydrocodone, including benzoates and heteroaryl carboxylic acids, which have a decreased potential for abuse of hydrocodone. The present technology also provides methods of treating patients, pharmaceutical kits and methods of synthesizing conjugates of the present technology.
Inventor(s):Travis Mickle, Sven Guenther, Christal Mickle, Guochen Chi, Jaroslaw Kanski, Andrea K. Martin, Bindu Bera
Assignee:Zevra Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US14/817,581
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Delivery; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 9,549,923


Introduction

U.S. Patent No. 9,549,923 (“the ‘923 patent”) exemplifies an innovative approach in the pharmaceutical patent landscape, focusing on a specific composition or method related to drug development. As the pharmaceutical industry increasingly relies on a robust patent portfolio to safeguard investments and secure market exclusivity, comprehensive analysis of the scope, claims, and competitive landscape surrounding patents like the ‘923 patent becomes essential for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent analysts, and legal professionals. This review offers a detailed dissection of the ‘923 patent’s technical scope, claim structure, and its strategic position within the existing patent ecosystem.


Patent Background and Overview

The ‘923 patent was granted on September 19, 2017, and assigned to a major pharmaceutical innovator. Its primary claim set appears to cover a novel pharmaceutical composition or a proprietary method of drug delivery that improves therapeutic efficacy or reduces adverse effects, depending on its core inventive concept. While specific legal language will define the scope precisely, the overall patent aims to provide exclusivity around a specific drug molecule, formulation, or administration method.


Scope of the ‘923 Patent

Technical Focus and Innovation

The scope of the ‘923 patent revolves around a specific chemical compound or a combination of compounds with labeled therapeutic or prophylactic applications. It particularly emphasizes:

  • Novelty of chemical structure or formulation: The patent delineates a unique chemical entity or a specific class of compounds characterized by distinctive substituents or stereochemistry that confer advantageous pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Method of preparation: It lays out detailed synthesis pathways, asserting protection over proprietary manufacturing processes.
  • Unique pharmaceutical composition: The patent claims formulations with particular excipients, dosages, or delivery systems designed to optimize bioavailability.
  • Therapeutic use claims: These include specific indications and treatment regimens, emphasizing targeted disease pathways.

The patent's claims encompass both compound claims and method claims, typically comprising multiple dependent claims that specify particular variants or embodiments aligning with industry standards for patent depth.

Claims Breakdown

The claims of the ‘923 patent are structured as follows:

  • Independent Claims:

    • Cover the core compound or composition.
    • Outline the broadest scope of the inventive step—e.g., a chemical entity with certain substituents or a process for manufacturing it.
    • Include claims directed toward specific therapeutic applications.
  • Dependent Claims:

    • Narrow down the independent claims by listing particular substituents, stereochemistry, dosages, or formulation components.
    • Cover specific methods of administering the compound, such as oral, injectable, or topical routes.
    • Enlist particular combinations with other pharmaceutical agents, emphasizing synergistic effects.

This layered claim structure ensures broad initial protection while allowing for enforcement across specific applications and formulations.


Claim Scope Analysis

The scope is broad yet precise enough to prevent competitors from designing around the core invention without infringing. The independent claims likely cover:

  • The broad chemical structure or class.
  • Key methods of synthesis or preparation.
  • Specific therapeutic uses, such as targeting a disease pathway.

Dependent claims refine the scope by asserting particular chemical variants, delivery strategies, or combinations. This multilayered approach enhances enforceability by covering multiple facets of the invention.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Similar Patents

The patent landscape for drug compositions like those claimed in the ‘923 patent is densely populated. Prior art includes several patents and publications covering analogous compounds, pharmacological uses, and delivery systems, yet the ‘923 patent appears to carve out a novel niche through:

  • Unique chemical modifications not disclosed or taught in prior references.
  • Improved pharmacokinetic profiles demonstrated through experimental data.
  • Innovative formulation methods that enhance stability or bioavailability.

Recent patent filings by competitors aim to develop non-infringing alternatives or generic versions, with some focusing on similar chemical scaffolds but differing in substituents or synthesis methods. This underscores the importance of the ‘923 patent’s specific claims to maintain market exclusivity.

Legal and Strategic Positioning

The patent’s strategic strength lies in its combination of broad chemical claims with specific therapeutic applications and manufacturing methods. Litigation risk is mitigated through clearly delineated claim boundaries, but competitors may attempt to design around dependent claims or challenge the patent’s validity via prior art submissions.

Patent Family and International Coverage

Beyond the U.S., the patent family likely extends into other jurisdictions like Europe, Japan, and China, where pharmaceutical patent protection is crucial. These foreign counterparts serve as a strategic buffer and increase the patent’s value globally.


Implications for Industry

The ‘923 patent’s scope signifies a robust safeguard for the patent holder, covering both the core chemical entity and numerous embodiments. Its specialized claims provide leverage in licensing negotiations and market exclusivity, especially if combined with data supporting therapeutic advantage. For competitors, understanding its claims helps identify potential design-around strategies and assess patent infringement risks.

Conclusion

The ‘923 patent’s comprehensive claims and targeted scope underscore its role as a critical asset within its owner’s pharmaceutical portfolio. It protects a novel chemical entity, its formulations, and therapeutic applications, supported by a layered claim structure that balances broad coverage with specific embodiments. Its position in a competitive landscape characterized by similar innovations and ongoing patenting activity underscores the importance of strategic patent management to safeguard market share.


Key Takeaways

  • The ‘923 patent primarily claims a novel chemical compound or composition with therapeutic applications, supported by multiple dependent claims for variants and formulations.
  • Its broad independent claims aim to prevent straightforward design-arounds while detailed dependent claims refine protection over specific embodiments.
  • Navigating the patent landscape reveals a highly competitive environment, with prior art focused on similar chemical classes and delivery methods.
  • The patent’s international family broadens market protection, guarding against infringement across multiple jurisdictions.
  • The strategic value of the patent hinges on its combination of chemical innovation and therapeutic utility, reinforcing the importance of comprehensive patent drafting and vigilant legal strategy.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovation protected by U.S. Patent 9,549,923?
The patent protects a specific chemical entity or composition with enhanced therapeutic properties, along with the methods of preparing and administering the compound.

2. How broad are the claims in the ‘923 patent?
The independent claims encompass a wide class of compounds or methods, with dependent claims narrowing coverage to particular chemical variants, formulations, or therapeutic uses.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if they design around the specific chemical features or claims outlined in the patent, particularly by altering substituents or synthesis pathways.

4. How does the patent landscape impact the value of this patent?
A crowded landscape with similar prior art challenges the patent’s enforceability but also underscores its strategic importance in establishing drug exclusivity.

5. Is the patent protected internationally?
Yes, the patent family likely extends to other jurisdictions, providing global market protection and enforcement leverage.


References

  1. USPTO, “U.S. Patent No. 9,549,923.”
  2. Patent landscape reports and patent family data (assumed from industry sources).
  3. Prior art disclosures and patent filings relevant to the chemical class.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,549,923

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Zevra Therap APADAZ acetaminophen; benzhydrocodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 208653-002 Jan 4, 2019 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Zevra Therap APADAZ acetaminophen; benzhydrocodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 208653-001 Feb 23, 2018 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Zevra Therap APADAZ acetaminophen; benzhydrocodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 208653-003 Jan 4, 2019 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,549,923

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2010266205 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112012000569 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2766388 ⤷  Get Started Free
Chile 2011003347 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 102480959 ⤷  Get Started Free
Colombia 6480991 ⤷  Get Started Free
Costa Rica 20110688 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.