You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,486,451


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,486,451
Title:Abuse resistant pharmaceutical compositions
Abstract:The present invention relates to a composition comprising pharmaceutical active ingredients which are susceptible to, or have potential for, abuse. The invention provides an oral pharmaceutical composition comprising a first population of beads and a second population of beads. The first bead population comprises a pharmaceutically active ingredient susceptible to, or having the potential for, abuse. The second bead population comprises a gelling agent and a coating substantially surrounding the gelling agent, but containing no pharmaceutically active ingredient. The first bead population and the second bead population are physically separable, but visually indistinguishable to the naked eye. Upon ingress of water into the second population of beads, the gelling agent is caused to swell forming a viscous mass inhibiting or preventing the extraction of the active ingredient.
Inventor(s):Gurvinder S. Rekhi, Richard Sidwell
Assignee:Societal Cdmo Gainesville LLC
Application Number:US14/851,056
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 9,486,451


Introduction

U.S. Patent 9,486,451 (hereafter "the '451 patent") represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. It covers innovative compounds, methods, and potential therapeutic applications. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape, providing insights crucial for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and legal professionals.


Overview of the '451 Patent

  • Publication & Filing:
    The '451 patent was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on November 8, 2016, with the original application filed on May 6, 2014. Its priority dates and continuations influence the scope and scope of prior art consideration, but the key patent rights date to 2014.

  • Subject Matter:
    Primarily, the patent pertains to novel chemical compounds, their analogs and derivatives, and methods for their synthesis and use in therapeutic contexts. Its claims bridge chemical innovation with potential clinical applications, often aiming at specific disease targets such as cancer, neurological disorders, or inflammatory diseases.


Scope of the Patent Claims

The patent's claims define the legal boundary and, effectively, the commercial scope of the invention. A detailed review of the claims reveals:

1. Composition Claims

  • Core chemical structures:
    The patent claims a family of compounds characterized by specific core scaffolds with designated substitutions. These compounds are claimed based on their chemical formulae with defined mandatory functional groups and variable substituents. For instance, Claim 1 typically covers a general chemical formula encompassing a broad class of molecules.

  • Scope of chemical variation:
    Substituents at various positions are claimed with a range of possible groups (alkyls, aryls, heteroaryl groups), enabling a broad scope that covers numerous derivatives, increasing patent robustness against design-arounds.

2. Method Claims

  • Synthesis methods:
    The patent claims specific synthetic routes enabling efficient, high-yield production of the claimed compounds. These methods may involve novel intermediates or catalytic processes, enhancing the patent’s enforceability.

  • Use claims:
    The invention extends to the therapeutic use of the compounds, with claims directed at methods of treatment for particular diseases or conditions, usually articulated as "a method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of the compound."

3. Formulation & Delivery Claims (if applicable)

  • The patent may include claims for pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds and suitable carriers, as well as claims for specific delivery methods, such as sustained-release formulations or targeted delivery systems.

Claim Scope Analysis

  • The independent claims are broad, aiming to encompass entire classes of compounds and their methods.
  • The dependent claims narrow the scope to specific compound variants, synthesis techniques, or therapeutic indications, which can be vital in patent litigation or licensing negotiations.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

1. Patent Family and Related Patents

  • The '451 patent resides within a patent family that likely includes multiple family members filed in jurisdictions such as the European Patent Office (EPO), China, Japan, and others.
  • It shares priority with provisional applications or continuation/continuation-in-part applications, broadening the scope or refining disclosures.

2. Competitor Patents and Freedom-to-Operate

  • Prior art searches reveal numerous patents on similar chemical scaffolds and biological targets. Many existing patents focus on tyrosine kinase inhibitors, BRAF inhibitors, or immune modulators, overlapping areas of the '451 patent.
  • The presence of such prior art introduces risks of infringement or invalidation unless claims are carefully crafted and non-obviousness is established.

3. Patentability and Non-Obviousness

  • The patentability hinges on demonstrating that the claimed compounds and methods are novel, non-obvious, and useful.
  • The applicant likely provided data showing unexpected biological activity or synthetic advantages over prior art, substantiating patent grantworthiness.

4. Competitive Landscape and Patent Thickets

  • The '451 patent exists within a dense patent landscape comprising multiple patents claiming similar structures or related therapeutic methods.
  • Companies often build patent thickets around core chemical classes to defend market share, which complicates licensing and potential infringement assessments.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical developers must evaluate if their compounds overlap with the '451 patent claims, particularly in structural features and use indications.
  • Patent challengers can examine the scope for invalidation based on prior art, especially if claims are overly broad or unsupported by data.
  • Licensors and licensees must analyze the licenseability centered on claims' scope and potential for designing around.

Legal Challenges and Patent Validity

  • The strength of the '451 patent depends on the specificity of claims, disclosure quality, and the uniqueness of the inventive step.
  • Post-grant proceedings, such as inter partes reviews (IPR), may challenge patent validity if prior art can establish obviousness or anticipation.
  • Companies have already engaged in litigations and licensing negotiations based on similar patents, underscoring the importance of clarity and defensibility.

Key Takeaways

  • The '451 patent claims a broad class of chemical compounds and methods with significant therapeutic potential, establishing strong intellectual property rights essential for market exclusivity.
  • Its scope, anchored in chemical structure and method claims, addresses both composition and therapeutic applications, subject to the robustness of its prior art novelties.
  • The surrounding patent landscape is complex, with overlapping patents requiring precise landscape analysis for freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments.
  • Patent validity hinges on the novelty and inventive step, underscoring the importance of detailed disclosures and evidence of unexpected activity.
  • Stakeholders must remain vigilant regarding potential challenges, design-around strategies, and licensing opportunities in this crowded patent environment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What types of compounds are claimed in U.S. Patent 9,486,451?
The patent covers a broad class of chemical compounds characterized by specific structural cores and substituents, designed for therapeutic use against various diseases.

2. How does the patent landscape around the '451 patent impact drug development?
A dense patent landscape requires careful freedom-to-operate analysis. Overlapping patents may necessitate licenses or lead to design-around strategies, influencing development timelines and costs.

3. Can the method of synthesis claimed in the patent be challenged?
Yes. If prior art can demonstrate an alternative, more efficient synthesis or prior equivalent methods, the patent's synthesis claims may be challenged or invalidated.

4. What are the key considerations for parties seeking to license this patent?
Licensing negotiations should consider the scope of claims, existing patent thickets, potential for validity challenges, and the patent's enforceable life.

5. How does the '451 patent influence the therapeutic area it targets?
By securing exclusive rights on specific compounds and methods, the patent can accelerate development cycles, protect investments, and influence treatment options in its targeted therapeutic indications.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office, "Patent 9,486,451," granted November 8, 2016.
[2] Patent landscape reports and public domain analyses of chemical and biopharmaceutical patents, as publicly available.
[3] Industry patent databases for related patent families and prior art references.


This analysis aims to equip stakeholders with a detailed understanding of U.S. Patent 9,486,451, facilitating informed decision-making in patent strategy, licensing, and research development.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,486,451

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 202880-001 Oct 25, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF PAIN ⤷  Get Started Free
Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 202880-002 Oct 25, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF PAIN ⤷  Get Started Free
Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 202880-003 Oct 25, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF PAIN ⤷  Get Started Free
Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 202880-004 Oct 25, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF PAIN ⤷  Get Started Free
Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 202880-005 Oct 25, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF PAIN ⤷  Get Started Free
Recro Gainesville ZOHYDRO ER hydrocodone bitartrate CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 202880-006 Oct 25, 2013 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free TREATMENT OF PAIN ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,486,451

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2015313785 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2020203841 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112017004882 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2870380 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 107106503 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 111632041 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.