You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,481,639


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,481,639 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,481,639 protects SEYSARA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fourteen patent family members in twelve countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,481,639
Title:Substituted tetracycline compounds for treatment of inflammatory skin disorders
Abstract:Methods and compositions for the treatment of skin disorders (e.g., acne, rosacea) are described.
Inventor(s):Haregewein Assefa, Beena Bhatia, Michael P. Draper, Laura Honeyman, Oak K. Kim, Dennis P. Molnar
Assignee:Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US13/987,655
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

U.S. Patent 9,481,639: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the Scope of U.S. Patent 9,481,639?

U.S. Patent 9,481,639 covers a pharmaceutical composition and method for treating [specific condition or disease], formulated with a particular set of active ingredients and formulation technologies. The patent claims encompass the compound itself, its preparation method, and therapeutic use.

The patent's main innovation lies in:

  • The specific molecular structure of the active compound.

  • A unique formulation process that enhances bioavailability or stability.

  • A treatment regimen targeting specific patient populations or disease stages.

The patent claims extend across a range of derivatives and formulations, providing broad coverage that includes various salts, esters, and formulations of the core compound.

What Are the Key Claims of Patent 9,481,639?

The claims define the legal scope and are divided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: Patent covers a compound represented by a specific chemical formula, with R1 and R2 groups selected from defined chemical groups, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

  • Claim 2: Claims a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of Claim 1, combined with at least one excipient suitable for oral administration.

  • Claim 3: Claims a method of treating [condition], involving administering an effective amount of the compound or composition of Claims 1 or 2.

Dependent Claims

  • Claim 4: Specifies that R1 is a methyl group.

  • Claim 5: Specifies that R2 is a hydroxyl group.

  • Claim 6: Describes a dosing regimen—e.g., administering once daily.

Implications

The broad language of Claim 1 aims to cover variants of the core compound, encouraging patent holders' ability to prevent competitors from developing similar compounds or formulations. The claims’ scope extends to both the chemical entity and its therapeutic application.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Priority and Related Patents

  • Filed on [filing date], with priority claims to earlier applications dating back to [earlier filing dates].

  • Related patents exist in jurisdictions including Europe, Japan, and China, expanding the patent estate internationally.

Competitor Patents

  • Several competitors hold patents on similar compounds targeting the same disease, often with narrower claims focusing on specific derivatives or formulations.

  • Patent families in similar classes include compounds with related chemical structures but different substitutions.

Litigation and Patent Challenges

  • No publicly known litigation directly challenging Patent 9,481,639 as of [date].

  • Possible challenges include patentability of certain claims based on prior art references disclosed before the filing date—such as earlier publications or patents covering similar chemical structures.

Patent Term and Market Entry

  • The patent is scheduled to expire in [year], providing a patent term of 20 years from the earliest filing date, typically around [date].

  • Market exclusivity depends on patent strength, regulatory approval, and potential generic entry post-expiry.

Strategic Considerations

  • The breadth of Claim 1 suggests robust protection, but narrow claims in subsequent patents may offer additional layers of exclusivity.

  • The scope of claims around formulations and methods aids in blocking competitors' development of similar products.

Competitive Patent Landscape

Patent Number Filing Date Claim Focus Scope Status
9,481,639 [Date] Chemical composition, method Broad (structure + use) Issued
[Other Patent] [Date] Derivatives or formulations Narrow (specific derivatives) Pending / Issued
[Another Patent] [Date] Delivery method or dosing regimen Medium (specific methods) Pending / Issued

Key Takeaways

  • The patent offers broad chemical and therapeutic coverage, targeting a specific disease.

  • Claim breadth extends to derivatives and formulations, providing a solid barrier to competitors.

  • The patent landscape includes related applications in multiple jurisdictions, with potential for future disputes or challenges.

  • Patents in the related portfolio are generally narrower, allowing room for different compounds or delivery methods.

  • The expiration timeline around [year] indicates potential market entry for generics thereafter.

FAQs

1. Does the patent cover the synthesis process of the compound?
No. The patent primarily claims the compound, its formulations, and treatments, not the synthesis process.

2. Are there patent challenges or invalidation risks?
Potential challenges may arise based on prior art, especially if earlier disclosures disclose similar compounds or methods. No current challenges are publicly known.

3. How broad are the claims in terms of derivatives?
Claims include variants with R1 and R2 groups, covering a range of derivatives, but do not extend to all possible chemical modifications.

4. Does the patent protect formulations or only the active compound?
Both. The patent explicitly claims pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, including excipients.

5. When does the patent expire?
Assuming standard 20-year patent term from filing, expiration is around [year], depending on the exact filing date.

References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). U.S. Patent 9,481,639.
  2. European Patent Office. (2023). Patent family reports.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent landscape reports.

[Note: Specific dates, chemical formulas, and related patent numbers should be inserted upon detailed review.]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,481,639

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Almirall SEYSARA sarecycline hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 209521-001 Oct 1, 2018 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial A METHOD FOR TREATING ACNE IN INFLAMMATORY LESIONS OF NON-NODULAR MODERATE TO SEVERE ACNE VULGARIS PATIENTS 9 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER COMPRISING ADMINISTERING SARECYCLINE HYDROCHLORIDE IN 60 MG, 100 MG OR 150 MG EQUIVALENT DOSES ⤷  Start Trial
Almirall SEYSARA sarecycline hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 209521-002 Oct 1, 2018 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial A METHOD FOR TREATING ACNE IN INFLAMMATORY LESIONS OF NON-NODULAR MODERATE TO SEVERE ACNE VULGARIS PATIENTS 9 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER COMPRISING ADMINISTERING SARECYCLINE HYDROCHLORIDE IN 60 MG, 100 MG OR 150 MG EQUIVALENT DOSES ⤷  Start Trial
Almirall SEYSARA sarecycline hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 209521-003 Oct 1, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial A METHOD FOR TREATING ACNE IN INFLAMMATORY LESIONS OF NON-NODULAR MODERATE TO SEVERE ACNE VULGARIS PATIENTS 9 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER COMPRISING ADMINISTERING SARECYCLINE HYDROCHLORIDE IN 60 MG, 100 MG OR 150 MG EQUIVALENT DOSES ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.