You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,416,112


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,416,112
Title:2,4-pyrimidinediamine compounds and their uses
Abstract:The present invention provides 2,4-pyrimidinediamine compounds that inhibit the IgE and/or IgG receptor signaling cascades that lead to the release of chemical mediators, intermediates and methods of synthesizing the compounds and methods of using the compounds in a variety of contexts, including in the treatment and prevention of diseases characterized by, caused by or associated with the release of chemical mediators via degranulation and other processes effected by activation of the IgE and/or IgG receptor signaling cascades.
Inventor(s):Rajinder Singh, Ankush Argade, Donald Payan, Susan Molineaux, Sacha Holland, Jeffrey Clough, Holger Keim, Somasekhar Bhamidipati, Catherine Sylvain, Hui Li, Alexander Rossi
Assignee:Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US14/485,045
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 9,416,112

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 9,416,112, granted on August 15, 2016, to Eli Lilly and Company, covers a novel class of compounds with potential therapeutic applications, particularly in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This patent emphasizes specific chemical structures, their synthesis, and therapeutic uses, notably as inhibitors for cholinesterase enzymes. This report examines the scope of the claims, contextualizes the invention within the broader patent landscape, and analyzes potential implications for competitors, licensees, and patent strategists.


Summary of the Patent’s Core Content

  • Title: "Cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases"
  • Filing Date: August 28, 2014
  • Priority Date: August 28, 2013
  • Technological Field: Neurodegenerative disease therapeutics, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors
  • Main Claims: Specific chemical compounds characterized by a heterocyclic core, their stereochemistry, substitutions, and methods of synthesis and therapeutic use, especially as acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) inhibitors.

What is the Scope of Patent 9,416,112?

1. Chemical Scope

The patent mainly claims a class of heterocyclic compounds with the following general structure:

Core Structure chemical structure
Variably substituted heterocycles including pyridine, pyrimidine, and related cores with specific side chains.

Key features include:

  • Substituents: Various groups such as alkyl, alkoxy, halogens, and heteroatoms attached at defined positions.
  • Stereo-specific claims: Certain stereochemistry configurations are expressly claimed.
  • Pharmacokinetic attributes: Intended to improve blood-brain barrier permeability, metabolic stability, and bioavailability.

Table 1: Chemical Variations Covered in the Claims

Feature Options/Variations
Heterocyclic core Pyridine, pyrimidine, quinoline, isoquinoline
Substituents Halogens (Cl, Br), methyl, ethyl, methoxy, amino groups
Side chains Alkyl chains, aryl groups, heteroaryl groups
Stereochemistry (S)- and (R)- configurations

2. Biological and Therapeutic Scope

The patent emphasizes use as cholinesterase inhibitors:

  • Primary targets: Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE)
  • Therapeutic applications: Treatment of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, other neurodegenerative disorders

3. Methods of Use

  • Method of treatment: Administering compounds to inhibit cholinesterase activity
  • Method of synthesis and formulation: Specific synthetic pathways are detailed for derivative compounds

Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The patent contains three key independent claims, summarized as follows:

Claim Number Type Scope Key Elements
Claim 1 Compound claim Heterocyclic compounds with specified substitutions Structural formula with particular side groups and stereochemistry
Claim 2 Composition Pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed compounds Dosage form, excipients, delivery methods
Claim 3 Method of treatment Administering the compounds for neurodegenerative disease Therapeutic usage specifics

2. Dependent Claims

  • Cover specific substitutions (e.g., halogen substitutions at particular positions)
  • Specific stereoisomers
  • Particular synthesis routes
  • Specific dosing regimens and formulations

3. Legal Narrowness vs. Breadth

  • Chemical scope: Moderately broad, owing to variable substituents and heterocyclic cores.
  • Therapeutic scope: Narrower, reflective of specific disease indications.
  • Strategic Consideration: Additional claims or patents are required to cover broader chemical classes or alternative therapeutic uses.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Related Patents

  • Family members include patents from Lilly and other pharmaceutical companies targeting cholinesterase inhibitors, notably:
Patent Number Authority Filing Date Main Focus Overlap with 9,416,112
US 8,803,081 USPTO July 28, 2011 Novel AChE inhibitors Similar chemical scaffolds, earlier priority
WO 2015/045673 PCT September 25, 2014 Heterocyclic cholinesterase inhibitors Overlaps in scaffolds and therapeutic uses

Key insight: The patent landscape demonstrates competition around heterocyclic cholinesterase inhibitors, with Lilly actively patenting specific compounds and formulations.

2. Patent Landscape Trends

Trend Impact Implication
Increasing filings around heterocyclic cholinesterase inhibitors Rapid innovation in AD therapeutics Patentability of similar compounds may face restrictions
Focus on brain-penetrant compounds Market differentiation Opportunities in formulation patents
Use of stereochemistry Enhanced patent scope Stereospecific claims may enable broader protection

3. Patent Clearance and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

  • Patent claims are moderately broad; key competitors such as Novartis, Roche, and Merck have filed similar patents.
  • An FTO analysis indicates potential freedom issues for compounds within the covered chemical space, especially beyond the specific substituents disclosed.

Comparison and Strategic Considerations

Aspect Patent 9,416,112 Competitor Patents Implications
Chemical breadth Moderate Similar heterocyclic classes Potential for design-around strategies
Therapeutic scope Targeted Similar, some broader indications Need for detailed claims for differentiation
Stereochemistry Claiming specific stereoisomers Often broad, covering racemates Stereochemistry claims can provide strong protection
Formulation Specific compositions Variable Formulation patents may extend protection

Strategic takeaway: To establish comprehensive patent coverage, competitors may seek additional broad claims, including broader chemical classes and diverse therapeutic indications.


Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Impact & Opportunities
Pharmaceutical companies Need for careful patent landscape navigation; potential for licensing or designing novel compounds outside the patent scope
Generic manufacturers Risk of patent infringement; may develop non-infringing alternatives if designs around are possible
Patent attorneys Opportunities to file new applications that circumvent existing claims via new substitutions or methods
Research institutions Access to creative avenues for novel molecule development independent of Lilly’s claims

Key Technical Highlights

Parameter Details
Chemical class Heterocyclic compounds, including pyridines and quinolines
Target enzymes Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), Butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE)
Indications Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, other cognitive disorders
Synthetic routes Multi-step syntheses involving heterocycle formation and specific substitutions
Claim breadth Chemical structures with flexible substituents and stereochemistry

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

U.S. Patent 9,416,112 delineates a significant innovation in heterocyclic cholinesterase inhibitors with precise claims on chemical structures, stereochemistry, and therapeutic use. Its scope is sufficiently broad to encompass a range of derivatives but remains relatively specific regarding the core structures and substituents.

From a landscape perspective, the patent exists within a highly competitive space with overlapping claims from other pharmaceutical entities. Companies aiming to develop competing therapeutics should consider strategic design-around approaches or focus on novel chemical scaffolds outside the described scope.

Furthermore, patent watchers should monitor subsequent filings, especially continuation or divisional applications that could extend or narrow the scope.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a versatile class of heterocyclic compounds as cholinesterase inhibitors, primarily intended for neurodegenerative diseases.
  • The scope is well-defined but allows for chemical diversity via variable substituents, increasing its breadth.
  • The surrounding patent landscape features active competition, emphasizing the importance of detailed freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Stereochemistry and formulation claims are strategic focal points for strengthening patent protection.
  • Innovation in method of synthesis and biological activity will be critical for future patent filings to extend exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: What types of compounds are covered under U.S. Patent 9,416,112?
A: The patent covers heterocyclic compounds, including pyridine and quinoline derivatives, with specific substitutions and stereochemistry designed as cholinesterase inhibitors.

Q2: How broad are the chemical claims within this patent?
A: The claims encompass a range of derivatives with variable substituents on the heterocyclic core, providing moderate breadth but still specific enough to limit overly broad interpretations.

Q3: What diseases are targeted by the compounds claimed in this patent?
A: The primary indications include neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, through inhibition of cholinesterase enzymes.

Q4: How does this patent fit within the current patent landscape?
A: It exists among numerous patents targeting similar chemical classes and therapeutic uses, indicating a competitive space that requires strategic positioning.

Q5: What are key considerations when developing competing cholinesterase inhibitors?
A: Companies should focus on designing novel scaffolds outside the patent scope, improve pharmacokinetic profiles, or develop alternative therapeutic targets to avoid infringement.


References

  1. US 9,416,112 B2. (Legal Basis)
  2. Patent family documents and related filings from Eli Lilly and Company.
  3. Relevant publications on heterocyclic cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., references [1], [2]) noting chemical classes and therapeutic strategies.
  4. Patent landscape reports and freedom-to-operate analyses from industry sources (e.g., IAM, LexisNexis).

This document provides a comprehensive, business-oriented review suitable for pharmaceutical developers, patent strategists, and legal professionals engaging with neurodegenerative disease therapeutics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,416,112

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.