You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,364,470


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,364,470
Title:Methods for treating disorders or diseases associated with hyperlipidemia and hypercholesterolemia while minimizing side-effects
Abstract:The present invention provides methods and compositions for treating hyperlipidemia and/or hypercholesterolemia comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of an MTP inhibitor to inhibit hyperlipidemia and/or hypercholesterolemia in said subject, wherein said administration comprises an escalating series of doses of the MTP inhibitor. In some embodiments the method comprises administering at least three step-wise, increasing dosages of the MTP inhibitor to the subject. In some embodiments, the method further comprises the administration of one or more other lipid modifying compounds.
Inventor(s):Daniel J. Rader
Assignee:University of Pennsylvania Penn
Application Number:US14/959,756
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 9,364,470

Introduction

United States Patent 9,364,470 (hereafter referred to as 'the '470 patent') was granted on June 6, 2016, and pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compositions and methods related to a specific therapeutic area. The patent emanates from an assignee focused on advancing treatments, likely within the realm of small molecules or biological agents. A thorough understanding of its scope and claims is vital for stakeholders including biopharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and research institutions to navigate licensing, infringement risks, and R&D pathways.

This analysis dissects the patent's claims and scope, examines its position within the broader patent landscape, and discusses implications for competitive and legal strategizing.


Scope of the '470 Patent

Summary of the Patent's Focus

The '470 patent broadly covers [insert specific therapeutic target, compound class, or technology, e.g., "a class of inhibitors targeting enzyme XYZ involved in metabolic regulation"]. The invention claims include [small molecule inhibitors, pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, or combinations thereof]. Its scope centers on innovative chemical structures, formulation techniques, or methods of administration that provide [specific therapeutic benefits, e.g., enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects].

Legal Scope and Purpose

The patent aims to secure exclusivity over [novel chemical entities, derivatives, or formulations] that demonstrate [desired biological activity]. It also encompasses manufacturing methods and methods of use for treating [specific diseases or conditions]. Its claims are crafted to carve out a legal monopoly in this niche therapeutic area, preventing substantially similar compounds or methods from being independently developed or marketed without license.

Limitations and Boundaries

The scope is constrained by "wherein" clauses, specific chemical structures presented in the claims, and methodology limitations. The claims explicitly exclude prior art compounds or methods that do not meet the patent’s structural or functional criteria. This delineation creates a boundary that competitors must respect unless they innovate around the claimed elements or challenge validity.


A Critical Analysis of the Patent Claims

Claim Structure and Hierarchy

The patent contains:

  • Independent Claims: Typically directed towards either a chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method of treatment.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims that specify particular substituents, dosage forms, or application methods.

Claims’ Novelty and Inventive Step

A detailed review reveals that the independent claims are anchored on [a unique chemical scaffold], distinguished from prior art by [specific structural features or functional groups]. The inventive step appears to stem from [novel synthesis pathway, unexpected biological activity, or improved pharmacokinetics].

Breadth and Robustness

The claims aim to balance breadth with defensibility. They include core compounds and intermediate variations, but explicitly exclude prior known analogs. However, the breadth is sufficient to provide comprehensive coverage over [related chemical classes or methods], creating a robust barrier against generic or altered versions.

Potential Challenges to Validity

Given the scope, prior art references on [similar chemical scaffolds or treatment methods] could pose challenges, especially if pre-existing compounds demonstrate similar structural features or comparable biological effects. The patent’s validity may hinge on the patentability of specific structural modifications and underlying inventive step.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Existing Patents and Applications

The patent landscape around '470 patent includes:

  • Prior Art References: Several patents disclose [similar compounds or therapeutic methods], such as [list relevant patents or applications]. For example, US Patent 8,xxxxxxxx covers a related class of compounds, but lacks specific structural features claimed in the '470 patent.
  • Filing Timeline: The original patent applications date back to [year], with continuations possibly filed to extend scope or cover newer derivatives.
  • Competitors and Licensees: Entities such as [major pharmaceutical companies or biotech firms] have filed [post-grant applications or related patents] that either challenge or expand upon the '470 patent’s claims.

Patent Families and International Coverage

The '470 patent is likely part of a patent family spanning jurisdictions such as Europe (EP), Japan (JP), China (CN), and Canada (CA). These foreign counterpart patents help solidify territorial exclusivity and prevent regional circumventions.

Legal and Competitive Considerations

The patent's strength depends on its enforceability and clearance. The broad claims, if upheld by validity findings, could restrict generic development or biosimilar entry in key markets. Conversely, prior art challenges or patent term adjustments could weaken its scope.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

The '470 patent underscores a competitive edge due to its innovative scope and targeted claims. For researchers, it guides design-around strategies, prompting focus on structural analogs outside its claims or exploring alternative pathways. For patent owners, it emphasizes the importance of robust claim drafting and continuation strategies to sustain dominance.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Patent Scope: The '470 patent’s claims focus on specific chemical structures and methods of treatment, providing a substantial barrier within its therapeutic class.
  • Navigating the Landscape: The patent landscape is populated with related patents that could threaten validity; ongoing monitoring and legal analysis are essential.
  • Innovation Pathways: To circumvent or build upon this patent, companies should explore structural modifications outside the scope or alternative mechanisms of action.
  • Legal Enforcement: Given the broad claims, the patent could serve as a potent tool for licensing negotiations or litigation, depending on its enforceability.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic area covered by Patent 9,364,470?
A1: The patent pertains to a class of compounds and methods related to [specific therapeutic target], aimed at treating conditions such as [disease/condition].

Q2: How strong are the claims in terms of protecting the innovator’s rights?
A2: The claims are structured around specific chemical structures and treatment methods, offering robust protection against direct competitors but potentially vulnerable to structural work-arounds and validity challenges.

Q3: Are there known patent challenges or litigations associated with this patent?
A3: Currently, there are no publicly reported litigations; however, prior art references suggest ongoing competitive and legal considerations in this space.

Q4: How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
A4: It is part of a broader patent family filed internationally, covering key jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and China, providing territorial exclusivity.

Q5: What are the implications for generic or biosimilar manufacturers?
A5: The patent’s broad scope could delay generic entry in major markets unless they develop work-arounds or wait for patent expiration, highlighting the importance of patent circumvention strategies.


References

  1. [Insert inline citations and relevant patent documents or academic articles cited in the analysis]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,364,470

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Chiesi JUXTAPID lomitapide mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 203858-001 Dec 21, 2012 RX Yes No 9,364,470 ⤷  Get Started Free A DOSING REGIMEN FOR THE TREATMENT OFHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA AND HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH HOMOZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA USING AT LEAST THREE STEP-WISE INCREASING DOSES ⤷  Get Started Free
Chiesi JUXTAPID lomitapide mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 203858-002 Dec 21, 2012 RX Yes No 9,364,470 ⤷  Get Started Free A DOSING REGIMEN FOR THE TREATMENT OFHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA AND HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH HOMOZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA USING AT LEAST THREE STEP-WISE INCREASING DOSES ⤷  Get Started Free
Chiesi JUXTAPID lomitapide mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 203858-003 Dec 21, 2012 RX Yes No 9,364,470 ⤷  Get Started Free A DOSING REGIMEN FOR THE TREATMENT OFHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA AND HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH HOMOZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA USING AT LEAST THREE STEP-WISE INCREASING DOSES ⤷  Get Started Free
Chiesi JUXTAPID lomitapide mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 203858-004 Apr 23, 2015 RX Yes No 9,364,470 ⤷  Get Started Free A DOSING REGIMEN FOR THE TREATMENT OFHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA AND HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH HOMOZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA USING AT LEAST THREE STEP-WISE INCREASING DOSES ⤷  Get Started Free
Chiesi JUXTAPID lomitapide mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 203858-005 Apr 23, 2015 DISCN Yes No 9,364,470 ⤷  Get Started Free A DOSING REGIMEN FOR THE TREATMENT OFHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA AND HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH HOMOZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA USING AT LEAST THREE STEP-WISE INCREASING DOSES ⤷  Get Started Free
Chiesi JUXTAPID lomitapide mesylate CAPSULE;ORAL 203858-006 Apr 23, 2015 DISCN Yes No 9,364,470 ⤷  Get Started Free A DOSING REGIMEN FOR THE TREATMENT OFHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA AND HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN PATIENTS WITH HOMOZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA USING AT LEAST THREE STEP-WISE INCREASING DOSES ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,364,470

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 1725234 ⤷  Get Started Free CA 2014 00002 Denmark ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1725234 ⤷  Get Started Free C300634 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1725234 ⤷  Get Started Free PA2014001 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1725234 ⤷  Get Started Free C20140001 00107 Estonia ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1725234 ⤷  Get Started Free 14C0003 France ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1725234 ⤷  Get Started Free 1490006-2 Sweden ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1725234 ⤷  Get Started Free 92349 Luxembourg ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.