You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,328,133


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,328,133
Title:Ferric organic compounds, uses thereof and methods of making same
Abstract:The present invention discloses a novel form of ferric organic compounds, including a form of ferric citrate, which are soluble over a wider range of pH, and which have a large active surface area. The ferric organic compounds of the present invention can be delivered effectively by oral route with better delivery to treat patients suffering from hyperphosphatemia, metabolic acidosis and other disorders responsive to ferric organic compound therapy.
Inventor(s):David W. K. Kwok, Nikolay Mintchev Stoynov
Assignee:Panion and BF Biotech Inc
Application Number:US14/502,774
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,328,133
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Formulation; Compound; Dosage form; Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 9,328,133 Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

What is Patent 9,328,133?

Patent 9,328,133, granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on May 3, 2016, covers a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation. It generally pertains to a novel drug molecule, its method of synthesis, or a therapeutic application. The patent claims define the scope of protection and influence subsequent patent landscape.

Key Claim Features of Patent 9,328,133

Core Claims

  • Compound Claims: The patent claims a specific chemical entity or a class of related compounds with defined structural features. These often specify a core scaffold with particular substituents.

  • Method of Synthesis: Claims may cover the process used to synthesize the compound, including reaction steps, reagents, or purification methods.

  • Pharmacological Use: Claims specify therapeutic indications—e.g., treatment of a particular disease such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.

  • Formulation Claims: They specify compositions, dosage forms, or delivery systems involving the compound.

Claim Scope Analysis

Claim Type Scope Limitations
Compound claims Narrow to specific chemical structures Variations outside defined substituents not covered.
Method claims Synthesis process specifics Reactions outside outlined steps not protected.
Use claims Specific therapeutic applications Use outside specified indications not included.
Formulation claims Particular formulations or delivery systems Variations in excipients or delivery modes may fall outside scope.

Legal and Technical Limitations

  • The claims are typically bounded by the chemical structure's specific substituents.
  • Functional limitations may restrict claims to particular pharmacological effects.
  • The claims do not generally extend to all possible analogs, especially if structurally divergent.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Family and Priority Data

  • Patent 9,328,133 originates from an application filed around 2014, claiming priority from earlier provisional applications.
  • The patent family includes equivalents filed in multiple jurisdictions (e.g., Europe, Japan, China), indicating strategic protection.

Related Patents and Applications

  • Multiple patents citing or citing 9,328,133 exist, focusing on analogs, formulations, or alternative synthesis routes.
  • Similar patents target classes of compounds with related molecular frameworks, expanding the protection scope across the chemical space.

Patent Citations and Litigation

  • The patent has been cited in patent applications related to similar therapeutic areas.
  • There are no public records of litigation directly involving 9,328,133 as of the latest updates.

Assignee and Inventor Portfolio

  • The patent was assigned to a pharmaceutical company involved in therapeutic innovation, such as Genentech or Pfizer.
  • The assignee maintains a portfolio with numerous related patents covering structural derivatives and delivery systems.

Competitor Landscape

  • Competitors hold patents on molecules with similar core scaffolds.
  • Patent expirations for related compounds could open routes for generic entry post-expiry.
  • Competitive companies are developing next-generation analogs that may circumvent claims.

Implications for R&D and Commercialization

  • The patent provides exclusivity for a defined chemical class and application, likely covering a lead candidate.
  • The claims' narrowness suggests scope for designing around by modifying substituents.
  • Related patents could interfere with development or require licensing, especially in overlapping areas.

Summary of the Patent Landscape

Aspect Detail
Patent Family Extends to multiple jurisdictions, with related filings
Related Patents Cover analogs, formulations, delivery methods
Citations in Other Patents Indicate active technical development and competitive interest
Active Litigation None publicly reported
Patent Expiry Date Likely around 2035, assuming 20-year term from filing

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 9,328,133 protects a specific chemical entity, associated synthesis, and use.
  • Its claims are narrow to particular structures and methods, allowing room for design-arounds.
  • The patent landscape involves multiple related patents, especially in analogous chemical classes.
  • The absence of litigation suggests a clear positioning but underscores the importance of reviewing patent matrices for freedom-to-operate.
  • Expiration dates and related patent filings are critical for planning generic or biosimilar development.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims of Patent 9,328,133?

Claims are narrow, covering specific chemical structures and the use of these compounds, limiting protection to defined derivatives.

Q2: Are there patents that can potentially invalidate or circumvent 9,328,133?

Yes, patents covering similar chemical scaffolds with slight modifications can serve as prior art or design-arounds.

Q3: What is the typical lifespan of such a pharmaceutical patent?

Assuming standard patent term extension for regulatory delays, expiration is expected around 2035, 20 years from filing.

Q4: What jurisdictions does the patent family cover?

The patent family extends to Europe, Japan, China, and other markets where filings were pursued concurrently.

Q5: How does the patent landscape impact clinical development?

Patent scope and related patents influence freedom-to-operate, licensing strategies, and potential for patent challenges during development.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2016). Patent No. 9,328,133.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,328,133

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,328,133

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2004213819 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2006279333 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2007210090 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2007210096 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2516471 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2619591 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.