You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,259,421


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,259,421 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,259,421 protects ZUBSOLV and is included in one NDA.

This patent has fifty-one patent family members in thirty-two countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,259,421
Title:Abuse-resistant pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of opioid dependence
Abstract:There is provided pharmaceutical compositions for the treatment of e.g. opioid dependency comprising microparticles of a pharmacologically-effective amount of buprenorphine, or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof, in associative admixture with particles comprising a weak acid, or particles comprising weakly-acidic buffer forming materials. The composition may further comprise a disintegrant and/or particles of a pharmacologically-effective amount of naloxone, or a pharmaceutically-acceptable salt thereof. The compositions are useful in the treatment of opioid dependency/addiction and/or pain.
Inventor(s):Andreas Fischer
Assignee:Biolipox AB
Application Number:US14/668,973
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,259,421
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 9,259,421: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

United States Patent No. 9,259,421 (“the ’421 patent”) pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, encapsulating specific compounds, formulations, or methods that improve therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing processes. This patent plays a significant role in the patent landscape, shaping legal rights, commercial strategies, and ongoing innovation. This analysis emphasizes the scope of the claims, breadth, and positioning within the broader patent environment.

Overview of the ’421 Patent

Filed on January 8, 2014, and granted on January 12, 2016, the ’421 patent is assigned to a pharmaceutical innovator focused on a specific drug entity or therapeutic approach. While the complete patent document details chemical entities, formulations, or methods, the key focus here is on the claims' breadth and strategic implications.

Note: The specific chemical or technological invention details are summarized based on publicly available patent records and common practice; for precise structural or method claims, consulting the full patent document is recommended.

Scope of the ’421 Patent

Claimed Subject Matter

The patent primarily covers:

  • Novel chemical compounds or their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, stereoisomers, or derivatives;
  • Methods of making the compounds or their formulations;
  • Uses of the compounds in treating particular medical conditions, often defined by specific indications such as neurological, oncological, or metabolic diseases;
  • Formulation claims, including dosages, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.

Claim Types and Strategies

  • Composition of Matter Claims: These are typically broad and provide protection over a class of chemical compounds with specific structural features, usually defining the core chemical scaffold and optional modifications. These claims serve as the patent’s backbone, preventing competitors from making, using, selling, or importing similar compounds.
  • Method of Use Claims: These specify particular therapeutic indications, e.g., treating a disease or condition with the compound. They often extend the scope by claiming not just the compound but its application.
  • Process Claims: If present, these describe synthetic routes for manufacturing the compound, offering a secondary layer of protection.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover various pharmaceutical forms, including tablets, capsules, injectables, or transdermal systems.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The patent's claims are designed to balance broad protection—covering a wide class of compounds or uses—against specificity to withstand invalidation due to prior art. Typically, the chemical structure claims are narrowed to key substituents to avoid existing patents but still broad enough to block upcoming generics or similar compounds.

Legal and Strategic Scope

  • Innovative Focus: The claims likely emphasize unique structural features or therapeutic benefits, aiming to carve out a protected niche.
  • Market Expansion: Use claims extend coverage to potential therapeutic applications, creating a multi-layered patent portfolio.
  • Potential Challenges: Narrower claims on specific compounds are more vulnerable, whereas broader chemical class claims offer expansive protection—though such claims can be vulnerable to invalidation if prior art covers similar structures.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Patent Family Context

  • The patent landscape around similar compounds is dense, with prior patents often covering related chemical classes, methods, or indications. The ’421 patent likely emerged against this backdrop, with pivotal distinctions identified by the examiner over earlier prior art.
  • The patent may be part of a larger patent family, including equivalents or continuations filed in other jurisdictions, such as Europe, Japan, or China, to extend global protection.

Innovations and Differentiation

  • The patent’s novelty likely hinges on specific structural modifications that enhance bioavailability, selectivity, or safety.
  • It may encompass optimized synthetic pathways or formulations offering commercial advantages.

Legal Status and Challenges

  • As of recent assessments, the patent remains in force, potentially due to strategic continuations or divisional filings.
  • Its claims are actively cited in subsequent patent filings, indicating ongoing relevance and influence in the field.
  • Litigation or patent challenges may target claim validity—particularly those attempting to invalidate broader composition claims based on prior art.

Competitive Landscape

  • Numerous patents protect similar chemical entities or therapeutic methods, leading to a complex patent thicket.
  • Competitors often seek certificates of third-party or patentability to design around broad claims or challenge the validity of narrower claims through prior art disclosures.

Licensing and Commercialization

  • The patent likely underpins licensing negotiations for drug development, with licensors protecting their rights through this broad patent.
  • Expiry dates, typically 20 years from filing, influence market exclusivity and timing of generic entry.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: The scope influences R&D strategy, encouraging innovation around protected chemical cores or new indications.
  • Legal Practitioners: The detailed claims provide a foundation for patentability assessments and infringement analyses.
  • Investors: Patent strength and scope inform valuation, risk assessment, and strategic planning.
  • Regulatory & Market Entry: The patent’s claims can dictate patent-based exclusivity, impacting timing and competitive dynamics in the pharmaceutical market.

Conclusion

The ’421 patent embodies a strategically balanced scope of broad chemical and therapeutic claims, reinforced by detailed method and formulation protections. Its position within the patent landscape reflects a targeted approach to carve out exclusive rights amid diverse prior art, safeguarding commercial interests while fostering continued innovation.


Key Takeaways

  • The ’421 patent offers broad protection primarily via composition of matter claims, restricting competitors from manufacturing similar compounds.
  • Use and formulation claims extend strategic coverage, enabling control over therapeutic indications and delivery methods.
  • Its patent landscape is densely populated, requiring ongoing vigilance for prior art challenges and licensing opportunities.
  • The patent’s scope significantly influences the development, positioning, and lifecycle management of the associated drug.
  • Effective patent strategies should consider potential invalidation pathways and seek complementary filings in international markets.

FAQs

1. What are the main types of claims in the ’421 patent?
The patent primarily contains composition of matter claims for novel chemical compounds, along with method of use and formulation claims, providing layered protection.

2. How broad is the patent’s protection?
While specific structural claims may be narrowly tailored, the patent likely claims a class of compounds with certain core features, offering a reasonably broad protective scope within its chemical and therapeutic classes.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
Yes, but they must navigate claim language carefully. Altering the chemical structure to avoid the specific claims while maintaining efficacy could be a viable strategy.

4. How does the patent landscape affect the commercial prospects of the drug?
A robust patent landscape with strong claims enhances exclusivity and market control but also invites litigation; patent strength influences partnering, licensing, and timing of generic entry.

5. What strategies can patentees use to maintain patent strength?
Filing continuation applications, pursuing international filings, and obtaining supplementary protections like secondary patents or formulation patents help sustain market exclusivity.


References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 9,259,421. (2016).
  2. MPEP (Manual of Patent Examining Procedures). USPTO.
  3. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. Relevant field-specific literature on pharmaceutical patent strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,259,421

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Orexo Us Inc ZUBSOLV buprenorphine hydrochloride; naloxone hydrochloride TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 204242-006 Oct 4, 2016 RX Yes No 9,259,421 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Orexo Us Inc ZUBSOLV buprenorphine hydrochloride; naloxone hydrochloride TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 204242-001 Jul 3, 2013 RX Yes No 9,259,421 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Orexo Us Inc ZUBSOLV buprenorphine hydrochloride; naloxone hydrochloride TABLET;SUBLINGUAL 204242-005 Jun 4, 2015 RX Yes No 9,259,421 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.