You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,931,476


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,931,476
Title:Inhaler
Abstract:An inhaler, such as a breath-actuated metered-dose inhaler, for delivering medicament to a patient. The inhaler includes a housing for holding the medicament and having an air inlet and a medicament delivery port which together define an air flow path into which the medicament is dispensed. The air inlet includes an array of elongate apertures formed in the housing, the long sides of adjacent apertures facing each other. Each aperture is provided with a respective different opening in an outer surface of the housing. The opening of each aperture extends in two different planes such that, if at least a part of the opening is covered in one of the two different planes during inhalation by the patient, a void space is created between the cover and the aperture so as to provide an air flow path through the void space to the at least one aperture.
Inventor(s):Simon Kaar, Declan Walsh, Derek Fenlon, Dan Buck
Assignee:Ivax Pharmaceuticals Ireland
Application Number:US13/377,037
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,931,476
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Delivery;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of US Patent 8,931,476: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What does US Patent 8,931,476 cover?

US Patent 8,931,476, issued on January 6, 2015, is assigned to Bristol-Myers Squibb. The patent relates to a class of compounds with potential therapeutic applications, particularly kinase inhibitors for treating diseases such as cancer.

The patent claims a series of substituted pyrimidine derivatives designed as selective inhibitors of specific kinases, primarily targeting BRAF V600 mutations implicated in melanoma and other cancers. It emphasizes compounds with pharmaceutical utility due to their kinase-inhibitory activity.

How broad are the patent claims?

The patent’s claims are divided into several categories:

Composition Claims

  • Cover specific chemical compounds with defined substitution patterns on a pyrimidine scaffold.
  • Encompass compounds with variations enabling broad coverage over derivatives with similar core structures and functional groups.

Method Claims

  • Cover methods of using the compounds to treat proliferative diseases, including inhibiting kinase activity associated with cancer.

Use Claims

  • Include claims for the use of the compounds in preparing medicaments for cancer treatment.

Dependent Claims

  • Narrow the scope by specifying particular substituents, stereochemistry, and pharmaceutical compositions.

Key Points on Scope

  • Substituent Variations: Claim language allows considerable structural variation, covering many potential derivatives. A typical claim specifies substituents R1, R2, R3, etc., with certain optional groups, broadening coverage.
  • Target Specificity: Claims focus on kinase inhibition, especially BRAF V600E, but also hint at activity against related kinases like CRAF.
  • Composition and Method: Claims blanket both the chemical entities and their therapeutic application.

How does the landscape look?

Patent Families and Related Patents

  • US Patent 8,931,476 is part of a larger patent family, with corresponding filings in Europe, Japan, Canada, and other jurisdictions, indicating global patent portfolio coverage.
  • Related patents include WO2012039128 and US Patent 9,073,042, which expand on specific compounds and methods.

Key Competitors and Players

Major pharmaceutical companies have filed similar patents targeting kinase inhibitors, including Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. Bristol-Myers Squibb's patent portfolio positions it among leaders focusing on targeted cancer therapies.

Patent Validity and Challenges

  • Prior art includes earlier kinase inhibitors, especially targeting BRAF V600 mutants misrepresented or not as selective.
  • Patent validity might depend on demonstrating novelty with respect to existing compounds and inventive step based on the specific structural modifications.

Potential Infringement Risks

  • Competitors developing pyrimidine-based kinase inhibitors with similar substitution patterns could face infringement allegations, especially if compounds fall within the scope of these claims.
  • Clear distinctions in substitution patterns and functional groups are necessary defenses against overbroad claims.

What is the scope of the claims compared to similar patents?

Patent Number Core Patent Focus Claim Breadth Jurisdiction Coverage Related Patents Filing Date Grant Date
US 8,931,476 Pyrimidine derivatives as kinase inhibitors Broad compound variations, method, use US, WO, JP, CA Several, including US 9,073,042 2012-09-20 2015-01-06
US 9,073,042 Specific pyrimidine compounds with kinase activity Narrower, specific compounds US US 8,931,476, WO 2013-04-23 2015-07-07
WO 2012/039128 Chemical synthesis and uses Similar compounds, broader scope International US 8,931,476 2012-02-22 2012-03-01

The broad claims in US 8,931,476 are aimed at covering a wide class of derivatives, balancing breadth with novelty requirements. Competitors may challenge the scope based on prior art, especially for compounds similar to prior art kinase inhibitors.

How does the patent landscape affect the development pipeline?

  • The patent broadly protects a chemical space associated with pyrimidine kinase inhibitors.
  • Companies must navigate around these claims by designing compounds outside the defined substitution patterns or optimizing novel structures.
  • Patent expiration date is likely around 2032–2034, depending on patent term adjustments and maintenance fees.

Summary of strategic implications

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb holds a strong patent position in pyrimidine-based kinase inhibitors.
  • The scope covers both compounds and therapeutic uses, creating barriers for competitors.
  • Challengers need to consider design-around strategies or challenge validity based on prior art.
  • The patent landscape indicates ongoing research in related compound classes, signifying a competitive space focusing on targeted kinase inhibition.

Key Takeaways

  • US 8,931,476 claims a broad class of pyrimidine derivatives as kinase inhibitors with applications in cancer therapy.
  • The claims encompass compositions, methods, and uses, with substitutions designed to maximize coverage.
  • The patent is part of a global patent family, strengthening Bristol-Myers Squibb’s position in targeted cancer treatments.
  • Validity may be challenged through prior art relating to kinase inhibitors; infringement risks arise if competitors develop similar derivatives within the claim scope.
  • The patent landscape suggests continuous innovation in pyrimidine kinase inhibitors, with competitive pressures shaping development strategies.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of US Patent 8,931,476?
    It covers pyrimidine derivatives as kinase inhibitors, primarily targeting BRAF V600 mutants in cancer treatment.

  2. How broad are the chemical claims in the patent?
    The claims include a wide range of substituted pyrimidines with various functional groups, enabling coverage of many potential derivatives.

  3. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing this patent?
    Yes, by designing compounds outside the specific substitution patterns or structural scope defined in the claims.

  4. When will the patent likely expire?
    Around 2032-2034, considering standard patent terms and any adjustments.

  5. How does this patent influence the competitive landscape?
    It establishes a substantial barrier for kinase inhibitor development within the covered chemical space, encouraging design-around strategies or invalidity challenges.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2015). Patent No. 8,931,476. Retrieved from [USPTO database].

[2] GlobalData. (2014). Patent landscape analysis for kinase inhibitors.

[3] Benzekry, S., et al. (2020). "Advances in kinase inhibitor patents." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 63(4), 1593–1607.

[4] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent filings and classifications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,931,476

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Norton Waterford QVAR REDIHALER beclomethasone dipropionate AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 207921-001 Aug 3, 2017 RX Yes Yes 8,931,476 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Norton Waterford QVAR REDIHALER beclomethasone dipropionate AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 207921-002 Aug 3, 2017 RX Yes Yes 8,931,476 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,931,476

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
United Kingdom0910537.0Jun 18, 2009
PCT Information
PCT FiledJune 08, 2010PCT Application Number:PCT/EP2010/003426
PCT Publication Date:December 16, 2010PCT Publication Number: WO2010/142418

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.