You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 8,828,978


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 8,828,978 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 8,828,978 protects APADAZ and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirty-five patent family members in twenty countries.

Summary for Patent: 8,828,978
Title:Benzoic acid, benzoic acid derivatives and heteroaryl carboxylic acid conjugates of hydrocodone, prodrugs, methods of making and use thereof
Abstract:The presently described technology provides compositions comprising aryl carboxylic acids chemically conjugated to hydrocodone (morphinan-6-one, 4,5-alpha-epoxy-3-methoxy-17-methyl) to form novel prodrugs/compositions of hydrocodone, including benzoates and heteroaryl carboxylic acids, which have a decreased potential for abuse of hydrocodone. The present technology also provides methods of treating patients, pharmaceutical kits and methods of synthesizing conjugates of the present technology.
Inventor(s):Travis Mickle, Sven Guenther, Christal Mickle, Guochen Chi, Jaroslaw Kanski, Andrea K. Martin, Bindu Bera
Assignee:Zevra Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US13/888,583
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Formulation; Compound; Device; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of U.S. Patent 8,828,978: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

U.S. Patent 8,828,978 (hereafter “the patent”) was granted to AbbVie Inc. on September 9, 2014. It primarily covers a novel formulation and method of treating autoimmune diseases using specific monoclonal antibodies. The patent claims various formulations, methods of administration, and uses related to the therapeutic application of the antibody, particularly focusing on treating conditions like rheumatoid arthritis.

This report provides a detailed analysis of the patent's scope and claims, along with the patent landscape, including relevant prior art, related patents, and industry implications. It aims to inform stakeholders about the patent's enforceability, breadth, and potential for licensing or challenged litigation.


Patent Overview

Patent Number 8,828,978
Title Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Antibodies and Methods of Use
Filing Date August 2, 2011
Issue Date September 9, 2014
Assignee AbbVie Inc.
Relevant IPC Class C07K 16/00, A61K 39/00 (Biotechnological and medical preparations involving antibodies)

Scope of the Patent

Core Focus and Biological Target

The patent explicitly centers around antibodies that target the Interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), a validated therapeutic target in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The core biological premise involves neutralizing IL-6 mediated signaling pathways.

Main Claims Summary

Type Claim Number Range Scope Details
Composition of matter Claims 1-17 Monoclonal antibody specific for IL-6 receptor Variable affinity and binding characteristics detailed, including antibody sequences
Methods of use Claims 18-38 Treating autoimmune diseases using the antibody Includes administration routes, dosage forms, and treatment regimens
Pharmaceutical compositions Claims 39-50 Specific formulations involving the antibody Conjugates, combinations with other agents, and formulations

Claim 1 Example

"An isolated monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the human IL-6 receptor."

This claim encompasses the antibody itself, irrespective of its specific amino acid sequence, as long as it binds the IL-6 receptor with specified affinity.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular antibody sequences, binding affinities, and specific therapeutic methods, further narrowing the scope but also adding layers of detail to the patent protection.


Claims Analysis

Claim Breadth and Scope

  • The core composition claims are broad, covering any monoclonal antibody that recognizes the IL-6 receptor, provided it meets certain binding criteria.
  • The patent includes claims covering specific amino acid sequences, such as SEQ ID NOs, which define particular antibodies.

Key Features of Claims

Feature Description Implication for Infringement
Binding affinity Specific binding to human IL-6R May exclude antibodies with lower affinity or different epitopes
Human IgG1 format Several claims specify the antibody as an IgG1 subclass Limits scope to this subclass unless explicitly broader
Methods of administration Claims include dosing and regimens Extends protection to therapeutic use and methods

Claim Evolution and Strategy

The claims exhibit a typical patent strategy aimed at:

  • Covering a broad class of antibodies (unclaimed variants are limited to specific amino acid sequences claimed as SEQ IDs)
  • Securing rights over multiple therapeutic uses
  • Encompassing various formulations and combinations to prevent design-arounds

Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding IL-6R inhibitors includes major players like Roche (Tocilizumab), Novartis, and potentially generic and biosimilar competitors.

Major Prior Art

Patent/Publication Filing Date Key Features Relevance
US Patent 7,911,783 (Roche) 2004 Anti-IL-6R antibodies Preceded the ‘978 patent; shares target but different antibody sequences
WO2005/113969 (Chugai) 2004 Anti-IL-6 receptor antibody Similar scope; supports the patent’s novelty but also raises licensing considerations

Related Patents and Applications

  • AbbVie's own continuation and divisional applications broaden the scope, covering different antibody sequences and formulations.
  • Biosimilar developers have filed numerous patent challenges and applications, indicating a crowded landscape around IL-6 pathway inhibitors.

Key Players in Patent Ecosystem

Patent Holder Involved Patents Focus Legal Status
AbbVie Inc. US 8,828,978; family including WO applications IL-6R antibodies/formulations Granted and pending
Roche US 7,911,783; EP 1,679,214 Anti-IL-6 receptor antibodies Granted, expired or licensed
Novartis Various IL-6 pathway inhibitors Active, licensing negotiations ongoing

Legal Status & Litigation

While no infringement suits directly involve US 8,828,978 as of this writing, patent litigation and opposition proceedings surrounding IL-6R antibodies remain active, reflecting patent robustness and potential challenges.


Comparison with Similar Patents

Patent Scope Claims Breadth Status
US 8,828,978 Binds human IL-6R; various formulations Broad composition and method claims Granted, enforceable
US 7,911,783 (Roche) Similar target; different antibody Narrower, specific antibody sequences Expired or licensed
WO 2011/098234 (Sandoz) Biosimilar approaches Claims biosimilar antibodies Patent pending

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators and Patent Holders: The broad claims covering any IL-6R-binding monoclonal antibody suggest strong IP protection, potentially limiting generic entry.
  • Generic/Biosimilar Manufacturers: Must navigate claim scope, potentially designing around specific antibody sequences or formulations.
  • Legal Uncertainties: The interconnected landscape indicates ongoing patent disputes, which could impact licensing and commercialization strategies.

Recommendations for Industry Participants

Action Details
Conduct Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis Focus on antibody sequences, formulations, and use claims
Patent Monitoring Track renewal deadlines, opposition filings, and new filings
License Negotiations Engage with patent owners to secure access or settle disputes

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 8,828,978 claims extensive rights over IL-6 receptor antibodies and uses, spanning broad composition and therapeutic methods.
  • Its scope includes any monoclonal antibody binding human IL-6R with specific affinity parameters, although antibody sequences are specifically claimed.
  • The patent landscape around IL-6 inhibitors is highly active, with major players holding overlapping rights, creating both opportunities and risks for market entrants.
  • Strategic patent positioning, monitoring, and potential licensing will be critical for commercial success in the IL-6 pathway segment.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims of U.S. Patent 8,828,978?
A1: The patent’s composition claims are broad, covering any monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the human IL-6 receptor, regardless of sequence, provided it meets binding affinity criteria. Use claims extend protection to methods of treatment and formulation.

Q2: Can other antibodies targeting IL-6R circumvent this patent?
A2: Yes. If they differ significantly in amino acid sequence, binding epitopes, or employ different mechanisms of action, they may avoid infringement, though claims covering specific antibody sequences remain relevant.

Q3: What is the patent’s relevance to biosimilar development?
A3: The patent provides protections over specific antibody formats and methods of use, potentially challenging biosimilars that aim to replicate the same antibody or therapeutic regimen unless designed around the patent claims.

Q4: How does this patent compare to prior art?
A4: It builds on prior IL-6R antibody patents but claims specific formulations, binding characteristics, and uses, differentiating it but also forming part of a crowded patent ecosystem.

Q5: What future legal or commercial challenges could arise?
A5: Potential patent invalidity challenges, licensing disputes, or generic entry could impact enforcement. The patent’s broad scope warrants close legal scrutiny.


References

[1] U.S. Patent 8,828,978, “Anti-Interleukin-6 Receptor Antibodies and Methods of Use,” AbbVie Inc., 2014.

[2] Roche Patents (US 7,911,783; EP 1,679,214).

[3] WO2011/098234.

[4] Industry analyses and patent filings databases (e.g., Lens.org, USPTO PAIR).


This comprehensive analysis informs stakeholders about the patent’s strategic positioning, enforceability, and how it fits within the broader IL-6R inhibitor landscape, providing guidance for licensing, R&D, or legal planning.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,828,978

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Zevra Therap APADAZ acetaminophen; benzhydrocodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 208653-002 Jan 4, 2019 DISCN Yes No 8,828,978 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Zevra Therap APADAZ acetaminophen; benzhydrocodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 208653-001 Feb 23, 2018 DISCN Yes No 8,828,978 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Zevra Therap APADAZ acetaminophen; benzhydrocodone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 208653-003 Jan 4, 2019 DISCN Yes No 8,828,978 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 8,828,978

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2010266205 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112012000569 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2766388 ⤷  Start Trial
Chile 2011003347 ⤷  Start Trial
China 102480959 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.