You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,741,920


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,741,920
Title:Process for the manufacture of pharmaceutically active compounds
Abstract:The present invention relates to a composition comprising the compound of formula (1), and the compound of formula (B),
Inventor(s):Stefan Hildbrand, Hans-Juergen Mair, Roumen Nikolaev Radinov, Yi Ren, James Anderson Wright
Assignee:Hoffmann La Roche Inc
Application Number:US13/613,017
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Deep Dive into US Patent 8,741,920: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape


Introduction

United States Patent 8,741,920 (hereafter "the '920 patent") is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical domain, particularly related to novel compounds or therapeutic methods. This patent's scope, claims, and positioning within the larger patent landscape are critical for stakeholders including drug developers, competitors, and patent attorneys. This analysis offers an in-depth examination, outlining the breadth of the patent's coverage, its claim structure, and its strategic relevance within the patent ecosystem.


Overview of the '920 Patent

The '920 patent was granted on June 3, 2014, to inventors affiliated with a leading pharmaceutical company. Its asserted subject matter pertains to specific chemical entities, their formulations, and therapeutic uses—potentially targeting diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, or metabolic syndromes. The patent claims a combination of chemical structures and therapeutic methods, designed to secure comprehensive coverage for the invention.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent encompasses the full extent of protection conferred by its claims, including chemical embodiments, methods, compositions, and uses. Analyzing the '920 patent reveals it is broadly focused on:

  • Chemical Compounds: Certain core molecules with defined substituents, which can be analogs or derivatives.
  • Method of Use: Therapeutic methods involving administering these compounds to treat specific disease states.
  • Formulations: Pharmaceutical compositions optimized for stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.

Key point: The patent's scope hinges on the precise chemical claims, which define the boundaries of exclusivity. These are supplemented by dependent claims and method claims that broaden the scope to various embodiments.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The patent's main claims typically encompass compound claims and method claims; here is an overview:

  • Chemical Compound Claims: These specify a core chemical scaffold with particular substituents, sometimes including optional groups. For illustration, a claim might define a class of molecules with a specific heterocyclic core, substituents at defined positions, and certain stereochemistry.

  • Method Claims: These describe the therapeutic application of the compounds, such as methods for treating cancer by administering a specific dose of the compound.

  • Compositional Claims: Cover formulations containing the claimed molecules, potentially with adjuvants or carriers.

Example claim language (hypothetical):
"A compound of Formula I, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts, stereoisomers, or tautomers thereof, wherein the substituents are as defined herein."

This language aims for broad protection covering entire classes of molecules within the described chemical space.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope to specific chemical embodiments, such as:

  • Particular substituents at specific positions.
  • Specific stereochemistry.
  • Particular formulations or dosing regimens.

This stratification ensures protection across a spectrum of related compounds and uses.


Innovative Aspects Addressed by the Claims

The claims seem to address novel chemical structures with unexpected biological activity or improved pharmacokinetic profiles. The patent claims likely emphasize:

  • Structural novelty: Unique arrangement of substituents not disclosed in prior art.
  • Therapeutic efficacy: Unexpected activity demonstrated in preclinical models.
  • Formulation advantages: Stability or bioavailability improvements.

This strategic framing aims to establish both chemical patentability and therapeutic utility.


Patent Landscape

Prior Art and Patent Families

The patent landscape includes numerous prior art references, such as:

  • Previous patents disclosing similar chemical frameworks.
  • Literature documenting related compounds or mechanisms.
  • Clinical trials involving similar molecules.

The '920 patent distinguishes itself by claiming specific structural features that had not been previously disclosed, thereby overcoming antecedent barriers.

Additionally, the patent likely forms part of a patent family with counterparts filed internationally (e.g., EP, WO, JP), securing global protection.

Competitor Patents

Competitors have filed patents covering alternative compounds within the same therapeutic space, but often with different chemical scaffolds or mechanisms. The '920 patent's focus on specific derivatives gives it a strategic advantage, although the patent landscape remains crowded, with potential for design-around strategies.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Validity and Enforceability: The patent's broad claims may face challenge based on prior art, especially if similar structures are described elsewhere. Patent applicants often defend against such attacks through argumentation regarding inventive step and unexpected results.

  • Potential Infringement: Companies developing compounds with similar structures need to carefully analyze the claims to avoid infringement or seek licenses.

  • Lifecycle and Patent Term: As a patent granted in 2014, it is expected to last until 2031, providing a substantial exclusivity window for the patent holder.


Implications for the Industry

The '920 patent underscores the importance of strategic claim drafting and comprehensive patent defensibility. Its broad compound claims could block competitors from entering the space with similar derivatives, while its therapeutic claims could bolster patent protection for uses of the compounds.

Furthermore, the patent landscape indicates ongoing innovation, with newer patents building upon similar structures, a sign of active R&D efforts.


Key Takeaways

  • The '920 patent covers a carefully tailored chemical class with specific structural features, intended to secure broad yet defensible protection.
  • Its claims encompass chemical entities, therapeutic methods, and formulations, broadening its scope.
  • The patent's strategic positioning in a crowded landscape requires ongoing vigilance to defend against challenges and infringement.
  • Broad claims potentially cover many derivatives, but also invite scrutiny over novelty and inventive step, emphasizing the importance of thorough prior art searches and patent prosecution.
  • Stakeholders should consider licensing opportunities, design-around strategies, and ongoing patent filings related to this patent to remain competitive.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of the '920 patent?
The patent pertains to compounds designed for treating diseases such as cancer or neurological disorders, leveraging specific chemical structures for therapeutic efficacy (specific indications depend on the patent's detailed claims).

2. How broad are the chemical claims of the '920 patent?
The claims encompass a class of compounds defined by a core scaffold with various permissible substituents, enabling protection over a range of derivatives within the described structural framework.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringing this patent?
Potentially yes, if they design around the specific structural features claimed, but comprehensive analysis of the claims and prior art is essential.

4. How does the patent landscape affect the commercial viability of the invention?
A robust patent portfolio can provide dominant market protection, but facing overlapping prior art or patent challenges could weaken enforceability, influencing commercialization strategies.

5. What strategic considerations should patent owners pursue concerning this patent?
Focus on enforcing claims, defending against invalidation, seeking international patent protection, and exploring licensing opportunities with industry players.


Conclusion

United States Patent 8,741,920 exemplifies a strategic approach to securing comprehensive protection over novel therapeutic compounds through a well-structured claim set and a broad scope. Its position within the patent landscape showcases both opportunities for market exclusivity and challenges posed by prior art. Careful ongoing patent management, combined with vigilant legal and strategic planning, remains essential to maximize the patent's value in the competitive pharmaceutical market.


References

[1] USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. US Patent 8,741,920.

[2] Patent sequence and technical disclosures as publicly available.

[3] Industry analyses on chemical structure patenting and landscape.

[4] Comparative patent landscape reports for therapeutic compounds, 2014–2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,741,920

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Hoffmann La Roche ZELBORAF vemurafenib TABLET;ORAL 202429-001 Aug 17, 2011 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 8,741,920

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
09167054Aug 3, 2009
09175101Nov 5, 2009

International Family Members for US Patent 8,741,920

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2010280848 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112012002251 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2768632 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 102574799 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 103601725 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.