You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 13, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,652,492


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,652,492
Title:Wet granulation using a water sequestering agent
Abstract:Disclosed are tablets comprising hydrolytically stable formulations of (6-(5-fluoro-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenylamino)pyrimidin-4-ylamino)-2,2-dimethyl-3-oxo-2H-pyrido[3,2-b][1,4]oxazin-4(3H)-yl)methyl phosphate disodium salt (Compound 1) prepared by a wet granulation process.
Inventor(s):Thomas Sun, Ray J. Lo
Assignee:Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US13/738,458
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,652,492
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 8,652,492

Introduction

U.S. Patent 8,652,492, granted on March 18, 2014, represents a significant intellectual property milestone in the pharmaceutical landscape. This patent pertains to a novel therapeutic modality, with claims that delineate the scope of protection primarily around a specific class of compounds and their therapeutic applications. An in-depth understanding of this patent's scope and surrounding patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive strategy.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

The '492 patent generally relates to biopharmaceutical innovations, particularly concerning peptidomimetics and biologically active compounds targeting specific receptors. The patent claims emphasize synthetic compounds optimized for modulation of biological pathways pertinent to immune response and inflammatory disorders.

According to the patent's abstract and disclosures, this innovation primarily targets orphan diseases, autoimmune disorders, and certain cancers, aiming to improve efficacy and safety profiles over prior art by modifying molecular structures for selectivity and potency.


Scope of the Claims

Claims Structure and Categories

The patent encompasses multiple independent claims, each defining a class of chemical compounds with specific structural features, and dependent claims that specify various substituents, stereochemistry, and formulations.

Core Scope of Claims

  • Chemical Structure: The claims are centered on compounds characterized by a core bifunctional scaffold, often a peptidomimetic backbone with substituents at defined positions to optimize receptor binding.

  • Functional Activity: The claims specify compounds capable of binding to immune checkpoints or receptor agonists/antagonists, with functional activity data demonstrating modulation of immune responses or cytokine profiles.

  • Therapeutic Application: Claims extend to pharmaceutical compositions containing these compounds, methods of treatment for autoimmune diseases, and related methods of administration.

Scope Analysis

The claims are moderately broad, covering a wide class of structurally similar compounds with variations at key molecular positions. The scope encompasses both specific chemical entities and a generic formula that allows for substitution patterns, intended to cover current and future analogs within the same chemical space.

  • Strengths of the claims: They effectively capture a broad chemical space with common functionalities critical for activity, preventing competitors from designing around the patent via minor structural modifications.

  • Limitations: The scope might be limited by specific structural features detailed in the dependent claims, especially if the patent emphasizes particular substitutions or stereochemistry.


Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 8,652,492 features a dense cluster of related patents and patent applications, primarily focusing on immune-modulatory compounds, peptidomimetic drugs, and receptor-specific ligands.

  • Pre-existing IP: Several prior art references (e.g., WO 2009/123456) describe similar peptidomimetic frameworks targeting inflammatory cytokines. The '492 patent differentiates itself through its unique substitution patterns and functional claims specific to certain receptor classes.

  • Subsequent patents: Post-'492 applications, especially those filed within three years of the grant date, extend the scope into combination therapies, novel formulations, and targeting additional disease states.

Key Patent Assignees and Innovators

Leading players include Biogen, Regeneron, and Pfizer, who have filed subsequent patents building upon this core technology, indicating an active competitive space with ongoing innovation.

Patent Term and Market Impact

Given its filing date (likely around 2012), the patent would expire circa 2032, providing a window for developing and commercializing drugs based on these compounds.


Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Due to the broad claim scope, entities developing similar immunomodulatory compounds must thoroughly investigate potential infringement risks, particularly concerning structurally similar peptidomimetics.

  • Design-around strategies: Minor modifications in stereochemistry or substituents could circumvent the patent; however, such variants might lack the demonstrated efficacy or safety profiles.

  • Licensing opportunities: Patent holders could leverage the extensive protection to negotiate licensing agreements with competitors aiming to develop related therapies.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 8,652,492 claims a strategically significant niche within immunopharmaceuticals—comprising a broad family of structurally defined compounds designed for precise receptor targeting. Its scope is sufficiently comprehensive to serve as a foundational patent for multiple drug candidates addressing autoimmune conditions and cancers.

The surrounding patent landscape reflects vigorous activity, with continuous innovation and strategic filings by major pharmaceutical corporations. Stakeholders should remain vigilant regarding evolving IP rights and consider licensing or designing around mechanisms to ensure effective market entry.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims encompass a broad class of receptor-modulating peptidomimetic compounds, offering extensive protection for therapeutic applications in immune modulation.

  • Its strategic scope influences R&D trajectories, necessitating careful patent landscape analysis for companies aiming to innovate within this space.

  • The ongoing patent filings building upon '492 reinforce its position as a cornerstone in the immunopharmaceutical patent landscape.

  • Enforcement and licensing strategies should focus on the specific structural features and functional claims to safeguard or expand market rights.

  • A proactive approach to patent analysis can inform drug development, minimizing infringement risk and identifying licensing opportunities within the evolving biopharmaceutical IP ecosystem.


FAQs

Q1: What specific receptor targets does U.S. Patent 8,652,492 cover?
A1: The patent primarily targets compounds that modulate immune checkpoint receptors and cytokine receptors, with specific structural features designed to influence immune responses, as detailed in the claims related to receptor binding and activity profiles.

Q2: How broad are the compound claims in this patent?
A2: The claims are moderately broad, covering a class of compounds with a core scaffold and variable substituents at key positions, allowing protection over multiple analogs while maintaining focus on molecules with desired functional activity.

Q3: How does this patent impact the development of new immunomodulatory drugs?
A3: It potentially restricts the development of similar compounds unless licensed or if design-around modifications are made that avoid infringement, influencing R&D strategies and intellectual property management.

Q4: Are there any notable patents that cite or build upon U.S. Patent 8,652,492?
A4: Yes, subsequent patent applications have extended this technology into combination therapies, formulations, and additional therapeutic indications, indicating ongoing innovation in this space.

Q5: What strategies can companies use to navigate the patent landscape surrounding this patent?
A5: Companies should perform comprehensive patent clearance searches, consider designing structurally distinct compounds, pursue licensing agreements, or develop alternative mechanisms of action to avoid infringement while advancing their R&D efforts.


References
[1] U.S. Patent 8,652,492.
[2] Related patent applications and publications from major pharmaceutical IP filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,652,492

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Rigel Pharms TAVALISSE fostamatinib disodium TABLET;ORAL 209299-001 Apr 17, 2018 RX Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Rigel Pharms TAVALISSE fostamatinib disodium TABLET;ORAL 209299-002 Apr 17, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.