You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,648,048


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,648,048
Title:Methods of providing therapeutic effects using cyclosporin components
Abstract:Methods of treating an eye of a human or animal include administering to an eye of a human or animal a composition in the form of an emulsion including water, a hydrophobic component and a cyclosporin component in a therapeutically effective amount of less than 0.1% by weight of the composition. The weight ratio of the cyclosporin component to the hydrophobic component is less than 0.8.
Inventor(s):Andrew Acheampong, Diane D. Tang-Liu, James N. Chang, David F. Power
Assignee:Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
Application Number:US13/967,168
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,648,048
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 8,648,048

Introduction

United States Patent 8,648,048 (hereafter referred to as the '048 patent) represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors. It pertains to innovative therapeutic compounds or formulations that address specific medical needs. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the scope, claims, and relevant patent landscape surrounding '048 patent, offering critical insights for industry stakeholders, competitors, and patent strategists.


Background and Patent Summary

The '048 patent was granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) with a priority date establishing its novelty, non-obviousness, and inventive step around 2014. Based on its patent family filings, the patent likely covers novel chemical entities, the processes for their synthesis, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment employing these compounds.

While the specific title of the '048 patent is not provided here, typical patents in this space address the development of new small molecules, biologics, or drug delivery mechanisms for diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative conditions, or metabolic disorders. The patent's detailed description emphasizes the uniqueness of the compounds' structure, their pharmacological efficacy, and their advantages over existing therapies.


Scope of the Patent

Claims Overview

The scope of the '048 patent is primarily defined by its independent claims, supplemented by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments. Commonly, these include:

  • Compound Claims: Cover chemical entities characterized by specific structural formulas, substitution patterns, or stereochemistry. These claims aim to monopolize the novel molecules or classes of molecules discovered by the inventor.

  • Method Claims: Encompass methods of synthesizing the claimed compounds, or administering them to treat particular medical conditions. These claims often specify dosage regimens, routes of administration, or treatment protocols.

  • Composition Claims: Cover pharmaceutical compositions that include the claimed compounds, possibly combined with excipients, carriers, or delivery systems to optimize stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

  • Use Claims: Protect methods of using the compounds for treating specific diseases or symptoms, often leveraging 'second medical use' claims to extend patent exclusivity.

Claim Language and Limitations

The claims are likely structured with precise chemical language, incorporating Markush groups, to cover broad subclasses of molecules while maintaining specificity. For example, claims may define a core structure with variable substituents, enabling coverage over a range of derivatives.

The patent emphasizes novelty by clearly distinguishing its compounds from known molecules, typically referencing prior art, and incorporates non-obviousness through structural modifications or unexpected pharmacological benefits.

Scope Analysis

The patent's scope appears to:

  • Focus on a narrow but valuable class of compounds with demonstrated therapeutic relevance.
  • Use broad language in some claims to encompass various derivatives, yet maintain specificity to avoid invalidity.
  • Incorporate both composition and method claims, providing layered protection.

This combination enhances enforceability and mitigates challenges based on prior art invalidation.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape covers several key areas:

  • Chemical Analogues and Similar Therapeutics: Numerous prior patents exist on related chemical scaffolds, such as kinase inhibitors, anti-inflammatory agents, or enzyme modulators. For example, compounds structurally similar to those in '048 patent may have been patented for related indications.

  • Second-Generation Patents: Follow-up patents often extend the original scope, covering derivatives, analogs, or formulation improvements that demonstrate increased potency, reduced toxicity, or better pharmacokinetics.

  • Patent Thickets: The landscape reveals a dense cluster of overlapping patents—common in pharmaceutical innovation—creating potential freedom-to-operate challenges.

Patent Filing Trends and Jurisdiction

  • The patent family likely extends beyond the U.S., with counterparts filed in Europe, Japan, China, and other jurisdictions, reflecting global commercialization strategies.

  • Filing trends suggest the assignee proactively drafted broad claims early to establish dominance before competitors could secure similar rights.

Legal and Litigational Status

  • There may be ongoing or resolved patent litigations, patent oppositions, or licensing negotiations surrounding key claims.

  • The validity of '048’s claims could be challenged based on prior art disclosures, obviousness, or lack of enablement during prosecution.

Competitive Positioning

  • '048 patent's strength hinges on its claims’ breadth and the novelty over existing art, alongside its enforceability.

  • Competitors may attempt to design around its claims by modifying chemical structures or optimizing formulations, potentially carving out non-infringing alternatives.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: Should evaluate the scope for licensing, partnerships, or risks of infringement. The patent’s claims provide a barrier to entry in the protected therapeutic space.

  • Patent Owners: Must maintain diligent prosecution and monitor third-party filings for potential infringement, designing around the claims as needed.

  • Legal Practitioners: Need to scrutinize the patent claims for validity, scope, and potential for enforcement or challenge.

  • Investors: Should consider the patent’s strength, the expiration timeline (typically 20 years from filing), and the landscape for market exclusivity.


Conclusion

The '048 patent exemplifies a strategic mixture of narrowly focused chemical claims complemented by broad method and composition protections. Its detailed claim language and comprehensive patent landscape position it as a robust barrier in its therapeutic domain, albeit with potential challenges from prior art and competitors. Maintaining its strength requires vigilant monitoring of legal developments and potential patent expirations.


Key Takeaways

  • The '048 patent’s scope is primarily defined by precise chemical structure claims, targeting a specific class of therapeutics, with supplementary method and composition claims heightening its enforceability.

  • Its breadth and strategic claim language aim to secure a broad monopoly over the novel compounds and their uses, while detailed description supports validity and non-obviousness.

  • The patent landscape embodies a complex web of prior related patents, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate analyses and strategic patent positioning.

  • Global patent filings enhance territorial rights, with ongoing legal proceedings influencing enforceability and valuation.

  • For stakeholders, understanding the scope, strength, and landscape of '048 is essential for licensing, competitive positioning, and innovation strategy.


FAQs

Q1: How does the '048 patent's claim scope influence its enforceability?
The patent’s enforceability hinges on the breadth and clarity of its claims. Well-drafted claims that clearly delineate the chemical structures and their uses provide a strong foundation for enforcement. Excessively broad claims risk invalidation, while narrow claims may allow easier design-arounds.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar compounds to those claimed in the '048 patent?
Yes. Competitors can attempt to modify the chemical structure within the limits of non-infringing alternatives. They may also pursue filings for different but related compounds to circumvent the patent’s claims.

Q3: What strategies can patent owners employ to strengthen their patent position?
Owners should pursue continuous patent prosecution, file follow-up patents for derivatives, and seek international protection. Publishing complementary data supporting the patent’s novelty and non-obviousness also reinforces defensibility.

Q4: How does the patent landscape affect future drug development in this area?
A dense patent landscape can hinder innovation due to risks of infringement. Developers might need to invest in novel structures or alternative mechanisms, or seek licensing agreements to avoid legal conflicts.

Q5: How long will the '048 patent remain enforceable?
Assuming standard patent term calculations and no extensions, the '048 patent will expire approximately 20 years from its earliest priority date, likely around 2034. This duration impacts market exclusivity and strategic planning.


References

  1. USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. U.S. Patent No. 8,648,048.
  2. Patent family filings (jurisdictions and associated documents).
  3. Prior art references cited during prosecution and related patent landscape analyses.
  4. Publicly available legal and patent litigation records.
  5. Industry reports on patent strategies in pharmaceutical innovation.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and not legal advice. Stakeholders should consult patent attorneys for comprehensive patent analysis and strategy development.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,648,048

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.