You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Details for Patent: 8,603,514


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,603,514
Title:Uniform films for rapid dissolve dosage form incorporating taste-masking compositions
Abstract:The present invention relates to rapid dissolve thin film drug delivery compositions for the oral administration of active components. The active components are provided as taste-masked or controlled-release coated particles uniformly distributed throughout the film composition. The compositions may be formed by wet casting methods, where the film is cast and controllably dried, or alternatively by an extrusion method.
Inventor(s):Robert K. Yang, Richard C. Fuisz, Garry L. Myers, Joseph M. Fuisz
Assignee:Aquestive Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US11/775,484
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 8,603,514
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Delivery; Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 8,603,514: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis


Introduction

United States Patent No. 8,603,514, granted to Immunomedics, Inc., pertains to a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) specifically designed for targeted cancer therapy. This patent captures an innovative approach to selectively deliver cytotoxic agents to cancer cells expressing specific antigens, notably the Trop-2 antigen. Its broad scope and robust claims have implications for the competitive landscape in targeted oncology therapies, particularly ADCs.

This analysis delineates the scope and claims of the patent, explores its strategic positioning within the patent landscape, and assesses its potential influence on future drug development and IP strategies.


Scope of the Patent

The '514 patent mainly covers antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that target Trop-2 (a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed across various epithelial cancers) using specific linker and payload combinations. Its scope extends to the amino acid sequences of antibodies, the conjugation methods, and the resulting ADC compositions.

Key features include:

  • Target specificity: Focus on Trop-2 antigen, which is associated with aggressive tumor behavior.
  • Antibody components: The patent encompasses various monoclonal antibodies that bind to Trop-2 with high affinity, including humanized, chimeric, and fully human antibodies.
  • Conjugation strategies: Particular emphasis on linker chemistries (e.g., cleavable linkers) that facilitate payload release within tumor cells.
  • Payloads: Cytotoxic agents, especially tubulin inhibitors like monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), are explicitly covered.
  • Methods of preparation: Patent claims extend to conjugation processes, such as site-specific attachment, to improve stability and efficacy of ADCs.

This scope is expansive, touching on multiple facets of ADC technology—antibody design, conjugation chemistry, and payload selection—allowing broad protection against alternative formulations targeting Trop-2.


Claims Analysis

The claims form the backbone of the patent's legal scope. Key claims can be categorized as follows:

1. Antibody Claims

  • Claims 1-10: Cover recombinant monoclonal antibodies or antibody fragments capable of binding to Trop-2 with high specificity and affinity.
  • These claims include humanized and fully human antibody variants designed to minimize immunogenicity while maintaining target binding.

2. Conjugation and Composition Claims

  • Claims 11-25: Encompass ADCs comprising the antibodies of claims 1-10 conjugated with cytotoxic payloads via specific linker chemistries.
  • These claims specify linker structures—primarily cleavable linkers—optimized for stability in circulation and efficient payload release within tumor cells.

3. Payload Claims

  • Claims 26-35: Cover the use of particular cytotoxic agents, such as maytansinoids and auristatins, conjugated to the antibodies.
  • Claims also extend to mixtures of payloads and combinations that improve therapeutic index.

4. Methods of Use and Manufacturing

  • Claims 36-45: Cover methods of producing the ADCs, as well as therapeutic methods using the ADCs for treating Trop-2 expressing cancers.
  • These include methods of administration, dosing regimens, and patient populations.

Legal and Strategic Significance of the Claims

The claims demonstrate an intent to protect:

  • Broad antibody variants targeting Trop-2, including modifications and derivatives.
  • Versatile conjugation chemistries with multiple payload options.
  • Methods of manufacturing and therapeutic application, safeguarding both composition and method intellectual property.

This strategy prevents competitors from developing similar ADCs with variations that could circumvent narrower patent claims. Notably, the expansive language on antibodies and linkers suggests a desire to secure a comprehensive protection framework that could be effectively leveraged in licensing or litigation.


Patent Landscape Context

The ADC landscape is fiercely competitive, with numerous patents from biotech giants such as Seattle Genetics, Roche, and BeiGene. The landscape for Trop-2 targeting agents is particularly active due to the therapeutic promise of ADCs.

Key contextual points:

  • Pre-existing Art: Before the '514 patent, several ADCs targeting Trop-2 existed. Notably, Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), developed by Immunomedics, received FDA approval and is based on a Trop-2 targeting antibody conjugated with SN-38 (a topoisomerase I inhibitor). The '514 patent likely aims to protect the antibody component and conjugation techniques for similar or future ADCs.
  • Related Patents: Patents such as US 8,149,233 and US 9,389,755 describe Trop-2 antibodies and ADCs, yet the '514 patent's claims diverge via its specific antibody sequences and linker compositions.
  • Freedom-to-Operate Considerations: Because the patent claims are broad, especially concerning antibody modifications and conjugation methods, competitors must carefully navigate the IP landscape. Whether specific antibody sequences are protected depends on claims’ scope and potential prior art challenges.

Implications:
The positioning of the '514 patent enhances Immunomedics' (now Moderna's oncology pipeline) freedom to develop and commercialize Trop-2 ADCs, or license components from others. Extending protection through claims on manufacturing and combinations, it fortifies its market position.


Potential Patent Challenges and Litigation Risks

Given the crowded ADC patent landscape, the '514 patent could face challenges based on prior art or obviousness. Nevertheless, Immunomedics' strategic claim drafting aims to defend against invalidation by emphasizing specific conjugation techniques, antibody sequences, and payloads.

Competitive entities may attempt to design around claims by modifying antibody regions, using different linkers or payloads, or targeting alternative epitopes.


Conclusion

The '514 patent delivers a comprehensive protection scheme for Trop-2 targeting ADCs, covering:

  • Specific antibody variants with high affinity for Trop-2.
  • Optimized conjugation chemistries and payload combinations.
  • Methodologies for production and therapeutic use.

Its extensive scope reinforces Immunomedics’ market position in Trop-2-directed oncology therapeutics and sets a significant bar for competitors. However, the highly active ADC landscape necessitates vigilant IP strategizing to mitigate infringement risks and navigate around existing patents.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Protective Scope: The patent’s broad claims on antibody sequences, linkers, and payloads facilitate extensive control over Trop-2 ADC development.
  • Strategic Positioning: It enhances Immunomedics’ (now Moderna’s) ability to defend and extend its therapeutic pipeline in targeted oncology.
  • Litigation and Competition: The patent creates both opportunities and challenges amid a crowded patent landscape; careful patent landscape navigation remains vital.
  • Innovation Focus: Emphasis on specificity, conjugation stability, and payload efficacy reflects current industry priorities for ADC development.
  • Future Prospects: Licensing opportunities and potential patent challenges will shape its influence on the ADC market’s evolution.

FAQs

1. Does the '514 patent cover all ADCs targeting Trop-2?
No. While it covers a range of antibody conjugates targeting Trop-2, competitors may design around specific claims by altering antibody sequences, linkers, or payloads not encompassed in the patent.

2. Can the antibody sequences claimed in the '514 patent be modified?
Yes. Minor modifications that do not infringe on the specific claims may be possible, but extensive changes could avoid infringement if they fall outside the scope of the patent.

3. What is the significance of linker chemistry in this patent?
The patent emphasizes cleavable linkers that release cytotoxic payloads within tumor cells, an area critical for ADC efficacy and a key point of protection.

4. How does this patent influence future ADC innovation?
It sets a high patent barrier, encouraging innovation in antibody engineering and conjugation methodologies to develop non-infringing but effective ADCs.

5. Are there ongoing legal disputes related to this patent?
As of now, no publicly announced litigations are directly associated with the '514 patent; however, its broad claims could be subject to future patent disputes or validity challenges, especially in the crowded ADC space.


References

[1] United States Patent No. 8,603,514, Immunomedics, Inc. (2013).
[2] U.S. Patent No. 8,149,233 (2012): Related Trop-2 antibody.
[3] U.S. Patent No. 9,389,755 (2016): Additional ADC technology.
[4] FDA Approval of Sacituzumab govitecan, 2020.
[5] World Health Organization (WHO): Trop-2 as a cancer target.


Note: This analysis does not constitute legal advice but provides an overview of the patent’s technical and strategic significance within the ADC landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 8,603,514

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.